H. Baptiste
To Win
S. Kenin
To Win
Sofia Kenin vs Varvara Gracheva Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W L L W L
Form
W W W L L W W L W LHead To Head: Kenin 1 - 0 Gracheva
They have played 2 sets in total, with Kenin winning 2 and Gracheva winning 0. The last match between Kenin and Gracheva was at the French Open - Paris, 27-05-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Sofia Kenin getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sofia Kenin | 1 |
| Varvara Gracheva | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: French Open - Paris(27-05-2025)
Sofia Kenin
Varvara Gracheva
6
3
6
1
| Kenin | Stats | Gracheva |
|---|---|---|
| 60% (24-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 47% (18-20) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 26 | Ranking | 106 |
| 4 | Highest Rank | 39 |
| 26 | Age | 24 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 9 | Titles | 7 |
| 59% (306-212) | Career Total W/L | 57% (282-211) |
| $9,129,718 | Career Prize Money | $2,493,357 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Comesana VS Boyer PREDICTION Clay
Generali Open - Kitzbuhel atp
20 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Collignon VS Kopriva PREDICTION Clay
Plava Laguna Croatia Open - Umag atp
20 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Sofia Kenin
Player
Varvara Gracheva
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
24%
(
4 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:6:0 | Average Match Time | 1:6:0 |
| 72% (43/60) | 1st Serve % | 65% (31/48) |
| 70% (30/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 39% (12/31) |
| 24% (4/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (7/17) |
| 75% (6/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (2/8) |
| 60% (29/48) | Return Points Win % | 43% (26/60) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kenin vs Gracheva Match Preview :
- Second Serve Performance: Recently, Kenin has won 39.7% of points on her second serve compared to Gracheva's 39.38%. Could this slight edge predict match outcomes?
- Return Game Stats: Kenin has won 47.98% of second serve return points against opponents, while Gracheva has a higher percentage at 51.77%. Is Gracheva's return game a key advantage?
- First Serve Return: Gracheva leads with 34.77% of first serve returns won versus Kenin's 29.23%. How might this influence head-to-head match predictions?
- Under Pressure: Kenin saves 53.68% of breakpoints, superior to Gracheva's 49.15%. Does this indicate a stronger mental game under pressure?
- Overall Match Performance: Kenin has won 54.55% of matches in the past year, while Gracheva has a slightly lower win rate of 47.06%. Does Kenin's overall success predict her as the favored player?
- Best Surfaces: Kenin performs best on grass with a 62% win rate, whereas Gracheva excels on clay, winning 65%. Will the surface play a vital role in this matchup?
- Event Level: Kenin's 60% win rate in Main tour matches in the past year outshines Gracheva’s 35.29%. How crucial is the level of play in choosing the favorite?
- Opponent Quality: Kenin has faced opponents with an average ranking of 115.75, slightly higher than Gracheva's opponents at 111.16. Does this difference matter?
- Deciding Set Performance: Kenin has won 47% of deciding sets in the last year, compared to Gracheva's 39%. If it goes to a deciding set, does Kenin have the edge?
- Break Point Conversion: Kenin converts 39.61% of breakpoints, narrowly leading Gracheva’s 38.1%. Could this be a decisive factor during play?
Editorial Prediction (May 26, 2025, UTC):
Kenin and Gracheva exhibit closely matched second serve performances, but Gracheva has a stronger return game, which could play a significant role in the outcome of the match.
Kenin demonstrates a superior ability to handle pressure, as indicated by her higher breakpoint save percentage. This could be crucial if the match becomes tight.
While Kenin's stronger overall performance in the last year suggests she might be the favored player, Gracheva’s ability to excel on clay surfaces could give her an edge depending on the court type.
Overall, given Kenin's advantage in breakpoint conversion, her better performance in decisive sets, and her higher match win rate on the Main tour, she is slightly more likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming match.
Kenin vs Gracheva Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Sofia Kenin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Sofia Kenin
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
73%
(
51 of
70)
9
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sofia Kenin
Player
Taylor Townsend
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
74%
(
54 of
73)
5
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Sofia Kenin
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
7
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Sofia Kenin
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sofia Kenin
Player
Ajla Tomljanovic
74%
(
89 of
121)
1st Serve %
61%
(
71 of
116)
7
Aces
16
4
Double Faults
7
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
53 of
71)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
46 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
46 of
116)
121
Total Points Won
116
|
5-7 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sofia Kenin
Player
Erika Andreeva
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Madison Keys
Player
Sofia Kenin
58%
(
58 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
106)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
60%
(
25 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
31%
(
31 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
113
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sofia Kenin
Player
Victoria Azarenka
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
3
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
6
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Varvara Gracheva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Sorana Cirstea
Player
Varvara Gracheva
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Varvara Gracheva
Player
Ana Bogdan
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Varvara Gracheva
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Varvara Gracheva
Player
Julia Riera
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
47%
(
29 of
62)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Varvara Gracheva
Player
Margaux Rouvroy
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Varvara Gracheva
59%
(
86 of
145)
1st Serve %
57%
(
77 of
136)
6
Aces
0
13
Double Faults
6
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
36%
(
21 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
55%
(
11 of
20)
Break Points Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
52%
(
75 of
145)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
74 of
136)
144
Total Points Won
137
|
6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alexandra Eala
Player
Varvara Gracheva
74%
(
77 of
104)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
3
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
26%
(
7 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
48%
(
50 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (306/212) | Win/Loss | 57% (282/211) |
| 56% (678/525) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (632/497) |
| 52% (5927/5419) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5465/4944) |
| 60% (178/120) | Hard Win/Loss | 49% (80/82) |
| 59% (88/62) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (151/82) |
| 53% (16/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (43/37) |
| 60% (24/16) | Grass Win/Loss | 44% (8/10) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 744 | Aces Total | 861 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 1692 | Total Double Faults | 1432 |
| 1:27:57 | Average Match Time | 1:31:22 |
| 317.21 | Average Opponent Rank | 344.76 |
| 66% (21758/33004) | 1st Serve % | 60% (19316/31976) |
| 64% (13866/21758) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (11951/19316) |
| 47% (5296/11246) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (6009/12653) |
| 45% (1725/3802) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1839/3873) |
| 43% (14300/33101) | Return Points Win % | 45% (14266/31450) |
| 59% (45/31) | Slam W/L | 51% (23/22) |
| 50% (53/53) | Masters W/L | 51% (28/27) |
| 38% (3/5) | Cups W/L | 40% (2/3) |
| 58% (88/63) | Main Tour W/L | 46% (67/79) |
| 65% (99/53) | Challenger W/L | 66% (121/63) |
| 72% (18/7) | Futures W/L | 71% (41/17) |
| 59% (299/509) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (278/489) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (67/135) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (50/93) |
| 59% (99/168) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (74/147) |
| 87% (295/257) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (289/249) |
| 13% (295/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (289/40) |
| 22% (223/48) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (204/32) |
Kenin vs. Gracheva Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
