Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Smilla Kjaergaard vs Victoria Carlsten Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kjaergaard vs Carlsten analysis and find out who is favored!
Smilla Kjaergaard vs Victoria Carlsten Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kjaergaard has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Carlsten has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kjaergaard, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Carlsten has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kjaergaard has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Carlsten has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kjaergaard has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Carlsten winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kjaergaard has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Carlsten has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kjaergaard winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kjaergaard winning 0 and Carlsten winning 2. The last match between Kjaergaard and Carlsten was at the W15 Varberg, 13-05-2019, Q1 round, Clay with Victoria Carlsten getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kjaergaard and Carlsten have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kjaergaard winning 0 times and Carlsten 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kjaergaard winning 0, and Carlsten 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kjaergaard has played against opponents with an average rank of while Carlsten has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kjaergaard has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Carlsten has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kjaergaard has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Carlsten has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kjaergaard 0 - 1 Carlsten
Ret.
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
36% (5-9)
Career Total W/L
50% (6-6)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kjaergaard VS Carlsten H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Smilla Kjaergaard | Victoria Carlsten |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 3 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Kjaergaard VS Carlsten H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-0 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Smilla Kjaergaard | Victoria Carlsten |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Smilla Kjaergaard Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Katriin Saar
Player
Smilla Kjaergaard
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
81)
72
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 1-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 5-7 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mariella Minetti
Player
Smilla Kjaergaard
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacquline Nylander Altelius
Player
Smilla Kjaergaard
64%
(
67 of
105)
1st Serve %
59%
(
72 of
123)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
52%
(
35 of
67)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
47%
(
9 of
19)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
48%
(
50 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
60 of
123)
115
Total Points Won
113
|
6-7(8) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Smilla Kjaergaard
Player
Imke Schluenzen
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
45%
(
15 of
33)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
52
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Betina Tokac
Player
Smilla Kjaergaard
81%
(
50 of
62)
1st Serve %
50%
(
20 of
40)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Victoria Carlsten Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Maria Lota Kaul
Player
Victoria Carlsten
39%
(
17 of
44)
1st Serve %
73%
(
33 of
45)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sara Dahlstrom
Player
Victoria Carlsten
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
8
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Carlsten
Player
Maria Lota Kaul
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
8
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victoria Carlsten
Player
Naima Karamoko
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-3 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Victoria Carlsten
Player
Sara Salemyr
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
29
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vivien Sandberg
Player
Victoria Carlsten
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
8
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
46%
(
21 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
56
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 1-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laura Svatikova
Player
Victoria Carlsten
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hannah Viller Moller
Player
Victoria Carlsten
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Victoria Carlsten
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Kjaergaard Vs Carlsten Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
