Prediction of Sinja Kraus [168th] vs Sada Nahimana [245th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W L W L W L
Form
W W W W W W W W W LHead To Head: Kraus 1 - 0 Nahimana
They have played 2 sets in total, with Kraus winning 2 and Nahimana winning 0. The last match between Kraus and Nahimana was at the W75 Szekesfehervar, 12-03-2025, First, Clay with Sinja Kraus getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sinja Kraus | 1 |
| Sada Nahimana | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Sinja Kraus
Player
Sada Nahimana
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:13:39 | Average Match Time | 1:13:39 |
| 60% (30/50) | 1st Serve % | 68% (41/60) |
| 73% (22/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (19/41) |
| 55% (11/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (8/19) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 60% (3/5) |
| 55% (33/60) | Return Points Win % | 34% (17/50) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sinja Kraus vs Sada Nahimana Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kraus 1 - 0 Nahimana
Editorial Prediction:
In the riveting domain of tennis, nuances in statistics often shape the narrative of impending matches. As we dive into the anticipated clash between Kraus and Nahimana, their second serve performance emerges as a pivotal point of analysis. Over the past six months, Kraus has marginally outperformed Nahimana, winning 38.46% of points on their second serve compared to Nahimana's 37.69%. This slight edge can be telling, especially given the significant correlation between second serve efficiency and match outcomes.
But what about their return game acumen? Delving deeper into recent form, Kraus showcases a slight advantage again, capturing 50.58% of points from their opponent's second serves while Nahimana follows closely with 49.24%. Even when facing first serves, Kraus maintains a narrow lead by winning 32.74% as opposed to Nahimana's 31.15%. These statistics, particularly those related to first serve returns, may offer an insightful glimpse into which player has the upper hand in this head-to-head battle.
When evaluating performance under pressure, we find Nahimana with a slight edge, saving 49.8% of breakpoints versus Kraus's 48.84%. This stat is invaluable for those interested in in-game betting, providing an indication of composure when it counts. Overall, Kraus's performance over the last year sees them achieving victory in 64.79% of their matches, with Nahimana slightly behind at 63.49%. This provides an intriguing overview of their competitive consistency, though both display a remarkable level of play.
Surface preference could also tilt predictions in this match. Both players excel on clay, with Kraus boasting a 66% win rate and Nahimana close behind at 62%. However, surfaces like Hard and Indoor Hard reveal vulnerabilities for both, as Kraus and Nahimana have their lowest winning percentages here. With this in mind, adjustments and adaptations to the playing surface could be decisive.
Another layer to consider is the level of opponents they've faced. Kraus encounters more formidable adversaries with an average rank of 285.96 compared to Nahimana's 387.21. When matches stretch into a deciding set, Kraus holds a modest advantage, having won 67% of them in the past year against Nahimana's 60%. Such resilience in crucial moments cannot be overlooked.
Furthermore, the rate of breaking opponents' serves might lend insights for live predictions. While Nahimana converts 44.44% of breakpoints, Kraus is not far behind with 42.68%. Each breakpoint opportunity signifies a potential pivotal moment in the contest, adding to the strategic dynamics at play.
Armed with these comprehensive insights, one might lean slightly towards Kraus as the potential victor in this tightly contested bout. Nevertheless, both performers offer plenty of promise, ensuring a captivating match-up in the realm of competitive tennis.
Sinja Kraus Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Sinja Kraus
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Dominika Salkova
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Panna Udvardy
Player
Sinja Kraus
46%
(
31 of
67)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
67)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
8
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
41%
(
9 of
22)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
47 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
52 of
91)
103
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Sinja Kraus
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
4
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
6-0 0-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Sijia Wei
59%
(
10 of
17)
1st Serve %
65%
(
13 of
20)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
8 of
10)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
23
Total Points Won
14
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Nao Hibino
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Jesika Maleckova
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Amarissa Kiara Toth
71%
(
72 of
101)
1st Serve %
78%
(
73 of
94)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
49%
(
35 of
72)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
49%
(
49 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
47 of
94)
99
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Anastasiia Sobolieva
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
73%
(
33 of
45)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Sada Nahimana Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Sada Nahimana
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
53%
(
19 of
36)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Amandine Hesse
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
66)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
9
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
75%
(
47 of
63)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Monika Stankiewicz
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Merel Hoedt
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Wozuko Mdlulwa
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Emeline Dartron
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
27 of
40)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Ekaterina Kazionova
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-6(0) 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (233/159) | Win/Loss | 61% (202/129) |
| 56% (506/393) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (433/305) |
| 53% (4334/3837) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (3569/3081) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 576 | Aces Total | 598 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 1141 | Total Double Faults | 877 |
| 1:29:51 | Average Match Time | 1:39:41 |
| 428.98 | Average Opponent Rank | 473.06 |
| 59% (14457/24563) | 1st Serve % | 67% (14171/21042) |
| 61% (8867/14457) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (8539/14171) |
| 45% (4563/10106) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (3182/6872) |
| 49% (1610/3296) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1372/2777) |
| 48% (11757/24714) | Return Points Win % | 47% (9965/21174) |
| 59% (230/388) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (199/328) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (37/75) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (35/65) |
| 64% (75/117) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (47/80) |
| 88% (217/191) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (196/177) |
| 12% (217/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (196/19) |
| 24% (175/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (135/24) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
