Simeon Stankovic vs Sean Cuenin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W L W L L
Form
W L W W L W W W W WH2H: Stankovic 1 - 0 Cuenin
They have played 2 sets in total, with Stankovic winning 2 and Cuenin winning 0. The last match between Stankovic and Cuenin was at the M15 Kursumlijska Banja, 17-05-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Clay, with Simeon Stankovic getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Simeon Stankovic | 1 |
| Sean Cuenin | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M15 Kursumlijska Banja(17-05-2025)
Simeon Stankovic
Sean Cuenin
6
3
6
2
| Stankovic | Stats | Cuenin |
|---|---|---|
| 68% (25-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 80% (37-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | 634 |
| Highest Rank | 503 | |
| 18 | Age | 21 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 4 |
| 56% (44-34) | Career Total W/L | 62% (108-66) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Zverev VS Fritz PREDICTION Grass
Boss Open - Stuttgart atp
15 Jun 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Dimitrov VS Monfils PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
15 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Simeon Stankovic
Player
Sean Cuenin
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
73%
(
33 of
45)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
12 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
47
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:8:29 | Average Match Time | 1:8:29 |
| 58% (21/36) | 1st Serve % | 73% (33/45) |
| 76% (16/21) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (20/33) |
| 53% (8/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 17% (2/12) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 51% (23/45) | Return Points Win % | 33% (12/36) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Stankovic vs Cuenin Match Preview :
- How has Stankovic performed on their second serve compared to Cuenin? Stankovic has a slightly lower second serve point win rate at 42.32% compared to Cuenin's 43.01% over the last six months, which is an important indicator for game predictions.
- In terms of returning games, Stankovic appears stronger, winning 51% of opponents' second serve points versus Cuenin's 46.97%. For first serve returns, Stankovic leads again with 32.16% over Cuenin's 30.66%, which favorably influences Stankovic's chances in this head-to-head match.
- Looking at the pressure scenarios, Cuenin slightly edges out Stankovic with a break point save rate of 50.85% compared to 50.24%, which is critical for evaluating real-time betting opportunities.
- Could match win rates be the deciding factor? Cuenin shows a strong overall performance with a 78.69% win rate over the last year compared to Stankovic's 60%, giving Cuenin a broader competitive edge.
- When examining surface performance, Cuenin excels on hard courts with a 66% win rate, whereas Stankovic has a 57% win rate on clay, which may play a role depending on the event surface.
- Analyzing the level of competition, Stankovic has faced players with a higher average rank (175.05) compared to Cuenin's opponents (235.74), indicating a potential difference in the quality of competition they've encountered.
- In deciding set situations, Cuenin has shown better resilience, winning 57% of such sets versus Stankovic's 40%, an essential factor for matches expected to go the distance.
- Considering break point conversions, Stankovic leads with a conversion rate of 45.21%, while Cuenin lags behind with 39.16%, advantageous for Stankovic during critical points in the match.
Editorial Prediction (May 17, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Stankovic and Cuenin presents a fascinating clash of strengths and minor weaknesses. While Cuenin demonstrates a higher overall win rate and proficiency on hard courts, Stankovic presents stronger return game stats and break point conversion success.
Although Cuenin maintains a better performance in deciding sets and faces less challenging opponents on average, Stankovic's ability to disrupt an opponent’s serve and capitalize on key opportunities suggests a competitive edge.
Ultimately, while each player has their merits, Stankovic's advantages in return games and break point conversions may prove decisive. Based on recent form and statistics, Stankovic is the more likely winner of this challenging encounter.
Stankovic vs Cuenin Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Simeon Stankovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandr Binda
Player
Simeon Stankovic
60%
(
58 of
97)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
32 of
40)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Simeon Stankovic
42%
(
35 of
83)
1st Serve %
51%
(
40 of
79)
7
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
8
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
44%
(
21 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Simeon Stankovic
Player
Silvio Mencaglia
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alen Mujakic
Player
Simeon Stankovic
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
47%
(
36 of
77)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
49%
(
34 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Simeon Stankovic
Player
Jiang Yi Qing
48%
(
23 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Branko Djuric
Player
Simeon Stankovic
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Simeon Stankovic
Player
Sean Cuenin
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
73%
(
33 of
45)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
12 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
47
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Sean Cuenin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Sean Cuenin
Player
Alen Mujakic
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sean Cuenin
Player
Dali Blanch
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
43%
(
36 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sean Cuenin
Player
Benjamin Thomas George
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
40%
(
18 of
45)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
59%
(
16 of
27)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sean Cuenin
Player
Jan Klimas
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve %
42%
(
14 of
33)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
11 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
39
Total Points Won
25
|
6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sean Cuenin
Player
Nikola Jovic
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
14 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Simeon Stankovic
Player
Sean Cuenin
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
73%
(
33 of
45)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
12 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
47
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sean Cuenin
Player
Vlado Jankanj
81%
(
51 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sean Cuenin
Player
Marko Nikolic
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
43%
(
25 of
58)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
56
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (44/34) | Win/Loss | 62% (108/66) |
| 56% (99/77) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (236/157) |
| 54% (908/778) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (1973/1637) |
| 0% (0/0) | Hard Win/Loss | 66% (42/22) |
| 56% (44/34) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (57/38) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (9/6) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 44 | Aces Total | 363 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 114 | Total Double Faults | 391 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:27:36 |
| 193.95 | Average Opponent Rank | 391.67 |
| 53% (1086/2044) | 1st Serve % | 63% (6013/9479) |
| 65% (704/1086) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (4005/6013) |
| 47% (449/958) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1694/3466) |
| 47% (128/274) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (470/1037) |
| 46% (1006/2199) | Return Points Win % | 42% (4021/9490) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 18% (2/9) |
| 56% (44/34) | Futures W/L | 65% (104/56) |
| 56% (43/77) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (108/172) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 53% (8/15) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (19/34) |
| 43% (9/21) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (26/45) |
| 97% (39/38) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (109/95) |
| 3% (39/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (109/14) |
| 15% (39/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (65/13) |
Stankovic vs. Cuenin Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
