Siim Troost vs Daniel Paty Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Troost vs Paty analysis and find out who is favored!
Siim Troost vs Daniel Paty Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Troost has won 47.94% of points on his second serve, while Paty has won 39.29%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Troost, in recent form, has won 47.12% of his opponent's second serve points, while Paty has won 52%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.41% and 28.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Troost has saved 61.45% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paty has saved 33.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Troost has won 53.49% of matches played (W/L 23/ 20), with Paty winning 58.14% (W/L 25/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Troost has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 17/ 13), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 15% (W/L 2/ 11). Paty has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 90/ 68), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 6/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Troost has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.76% of matches (W/L 23/ 19), where as Paty has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.14% of matches (W/L 25/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Troost winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Troost winning 0 and Paty winning 2. The last match between Troost and Paty was at the M15 Koszalin, 06-08-2019, Q3, Clay with Daniel Paty getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Troost and Paty have played a deciding set 0 times, with Troost winning 0 times and Paty 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Troost winning 0, and Paty 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Troost has played against opponents with an average rank of 43.02 while Paty has played against players with an average rank of 142.74.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Troost has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paty has won 46% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Troost has converted 47.69% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paty has converted 28.57% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Troost 0 - 1 Paty
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
698
Rank
664
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
41% (35-50)
Career Total W/L
53% (104-92)
40% (2-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Siim Troost | Daniel Paty |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 7 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-4 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Siim Troost | Daniel Paty |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 47% (46/51) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.13 | 0 |
Aces Total | 6 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.38 | 0 |
DFs Total | 18 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 74.4 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 58% (111/193) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 60% (67/111) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 40% (33/82) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 27% (4/15) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 35% (70/199) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Siim Troost Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Siim Troost
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Johan Alexander Rodriguez
Player
Siim Troost
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
4
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
84
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
QF |
Henrik Wiersholm
Player
Siim Troost
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
R1 |
Alexis Gautier
Player
Siim Troost
49%
(
33 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
7
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
1-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Siim Troost
Player
Matei Cristian Onofrei
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Siim Troost
Player
Mikhail Malakhovich
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Egor Agafonov
Player
Siim Troost
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Siim Troost
Player
Matteo Fondriest
67%
(
64 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
9
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
51 of
64)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
39 of
50)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
29 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
25 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(4) 7-6(3) | H2H |
view more
Daniel Paty Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Adrian Bodmer
Player
Daniel Paty
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
1
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
7
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Martin Landaluce
Player
Daniel Paty
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
4
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
21 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Paty
Player
David Poljak
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dali Blanch
Player
Daniel Paty
46%
(
33 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
93)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
93)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Daniel Paty
79%
(
68 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Paty
Player
Bekkhan Atlangeriev
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
57%
(
21 of
37)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Daniel Paty
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Paty
Player
Matei Cristian Onofrei
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Juan Bautista Torres
Player
Daniel Paty
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
46%
(
58 of
126)
2
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
7
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
57 of
126)
117
Total Points Won
102
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more