Shuo Feng vs Fabienne Gettwart Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L W L W W L
Form
L L L L L W L W L LHead-2-Head: Feng 1 - 0 Gettwart
They have played 2 sets in total, with Feng winning 2 and Gettwart winning 0. The last match between Feng and Gettwart was at the W75 Prague, 16-02-2025, Q1 round, I.hard with Shuo Feng getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Shuo Feng | 1 |
| Fabienne Gettwart | 0 |
W75 Prague(16-02-2025)
6
0
6
1
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Zheng VS Townsend PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
22 Mar 2025 / Third
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Dimitrov VS Khachanov PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
23 Mar 2025 / Third
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-1 |
Stats 
Shuo Feng
Player
Fabienne Gettwart
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
1
2
Aces (Total)
0
2
Total Double Faults
2
0:59:16
Average Match Time
0:59:16
63% (26/41)
1st Serve %
52% (25/48)
92% (24/26)
1st Serve Win %
52% (13/25)
40% (6/15)
2nd Serve Win %
26% (6/23)
63% (5/8)
Break Points Won % (Total)
0% (0/1)
60% (29/48)
Return Points Win %
27% (11/41)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Shuo Feng vs Fabienne Gettwart Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Shuo Feng 1 - 0 Fabienne Gettwart
Analysis of Second Serve Performance: In the realm of recent form, Feng has displayed a commendable ability to triumph in 40.45% of points on their second serve, while Gettwart has exhibited an even more impressive proficiency, emerging victorious in 45.3% of such points. It is worth noting that a substantial correlation between this statistical metric and the accuracy of match predictions has been established.
An Evaluation of Return Game Statistics: A thorough examination of return statistics reveals that in recent form, Feng has masterfully conquered 57.12% of their opponent's points on the second serve, while Gettwart has astoundingly secured triumph in 59.03% of such points. Comparable figures for first serve returns stand at 44.79% and 43.62%, respectively. These statistics possess a pronounced correlation with the identification of the favored contender in this head-to-head confrontation.
Analyzing Performance Under Pressure: In recent events, Feng has adeptly saved 45.88% of breakpoints, effectively demonstrating their ability to navigate challenging circumstances. Conversely, Gettwart has proven their mettle by saving 49.52% of breakpoints. This valuable statistic serves as a reliable indicator for in-game betting predictions.
An Overview of Performance: Over the course of the past year, Feng has amassed an impressive record, emerging victorious in 48.78% of the matches they have contested (with a win-loss ratio of 20/21). Notably, Gettwart has achieved greater success, triumphing in 61.11% of their matches (with a win-loss ratio of 33/21). These numerical insights allow us to construct a comprehensive head-to-head prediction overview.
Analysis of Preferred Surface: When it comes to surface preferences, Feng has exhibited remarkable prowess on I.hard, boasting a win percentage of 55% (with a win-loss ratio of 6/5). However, their performance diminishes on Clay, with a win percentage of 47% (with a win-loss ratio of 22/25). In contrast, Gettwart thrives on Clay, boasting a win percentage of 62% (with a win-loss ratio of 113/70), while their performance on Hard courts is less polished, with a win percentage of 50% (with a win-loss ratio of 11/11).
Assessing Player Level: Throughout the previous year, Feng has primarily competed in Challenger and ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10,000, ultimately triumphing in 50% of their matches (with a win-loss ratio of 19/19). Conversely, Gettwart has predominantly partaken in Challenger and ITF tournaments with similar prize money, securing victory in 45.95% of their matches (with a win-loss ratio of 17/20). When predicting the favorite, it is crucial to consider the relative nature of the statistical comparisons between players, accounting for the level of competition they have encountered.
Examining Opponent Quality: Over the span of the past twelve months, Feng has consistently faced opponents with an average ranking of 389.88, whereas Gettwart's adversaries have possessed an average ranking of 410.96. These figures illuminate the caliber of competition each player has encountered.
Deciding Set Performance: For those inclined towards live predictions and betting, it is worth observing that Feng has emerged triumphant in 50% of deciding sets over the past year, while Gettwart has secured victory in 47% of all matches played on the tour. This statistic serves as a crucial metric for those engaged in in-game wagering.
Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While past player performance certainly plays a pivotal role in predicting the outcome of tennis matches, it is imperative to scrutinize current event statistics to gauge the current form of players. It is advisable to refer to the section below for relevant information on in-form players within the ongoing event. Additionally, it is crucial to account for the influence of certain events on players' performance when making outcome predictions.
Examining Break Point Conversion: Recent performances reveal that Feng has impressively converted 51.18% of their opportunities to break their opponents' serve, while Gettwart has demonstrated a solid conversion rate of 49.39% in similar circumstances. This particular statistic offers invaluable guidance for in-game live betting, especially when a player finds themselves with a breakpoint opportunity.
Should you possess an interest in models that adeptly prognosticate tennis matches, you may find this article to be an enlightening resource. Please note that it is tailored for statistical enthusiasts.
Shuo Feng Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Arina Rodionova
Player
Shuo Feng
44%
(
8 of
18)
1st Serve %
58%
(
7 of
12)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
5 of
8)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
18
Total Points Won
12
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shuo Feng
Player
Chengyiyi Yuan
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
105)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
16
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
105)
106
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Shuo Feng
Player
Man Ying Maggie Ng
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve %
62%
(
21 of
34)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
51
Total Points Won
18
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elina Nepliy
Player
Shuo Feng
70%
(
81 of
116)
1st Serve %
63%
(
73 of
115)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
44%
(
51 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
53 of
115)
118
Total Points Won
113
|
6-7(4) 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shuo Feng
Player
Junhan Zhang
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriela Andrea Knutson
Player
Shuo Feng
48%
(
21 of
44)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Shuo Feng
Player
Fabienne Gettwart
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arlinda Rushiti
Player
Shuo Feng
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
80%
(
41 of
51)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nadiya Kolb
Player
Shuo Feng
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
81%
(
48 of
59)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Meiling Wang
Player
Shuo Feng
67%
(
66 of
99)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Fabienne Gettwart Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Kuczer
Player
Fabienne Gettwart
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
54%
(
15 of
28)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
20 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kristina Kroitor
Player
Fabienne Gettwart
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabienne Gettwart
Player
Milena Ciocan
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Josy Daems
Player
Fabienne Gettwart
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabienne Gettwart
Player
Romane Longueville
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Shuo Feng
Player
Fabienne Gettwart
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Silvia Ambrosio
Player
Fabienne Gettwart
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arlinda Rushiti
Player
Fabienne Gettwart
44%
(
43 of
97)
1st Serve %
72%
(
80 of
111)
4
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
10
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
47 of
80)
33%
(
18 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
45 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
54 of
111)
106
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Avdeeva
Player
Fabienne Gettwart
49%
(
31 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
3
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
7
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Vlada Zvereva
Player
Fabienne Gettwart
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
20%
(
4 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
51% (120/115)
Win/Loss
58% (145/104)
53% (279/247)
Sets Win/Loss
57% (321/247)
52% (2388/2214)
Games Win/Loss
52% (2750/2498)
52% (89/81)
Hard Win/Loss
50% (11/11)
47% (22/25)
Clay Win/Loss
61% (114/72)
50% (9/9)
Indoor Hard W/L
49% (20/21)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.1
Aces Per Game
0.08
229
Aces Total
192
0.27
Double Faults Per Game
0.28
596
Total Double Faults
726
1:5:12
Average Match Time
1:24:2
507.32
Average Opponent Rank
441.05
63% (6895/10911)
1st Serve %
68% (9119/13477)
58% (3975/6895)
1st Serve Win %
57% (5185/9119)
41% (1666/4015)
2nd Serve Win %
44% (1900/4358)
51% (776/1532)
Break Points Won % (Total)
50% (933/1874)
48% (5407/11246)
Return Points Win %
49% (6546/13477)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
33% (1/2)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
51% (86/83)
Challenger W/L
48% (44/47)
53% (33/29)
Futures W/L
64% (101/57)
55% (120/219)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
58% (143/247)
0% (0/6)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
63% (19/30)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
53% (21/40)
46% (28/61)
Deciding Set Win %
54% (39/72)
80% (133/107)
1st Set Won, Won Match
91% (136/124)
20% (133/26)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
9% (136/12)
13% (101/13)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
19% (113/21)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
