S. Shimabukuro
To Win
Y. H. Hsu
To Win
Sho Shimabukuro vs Tristan Schoolkate Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L L W L W W
Form
W W L W L W W L W WHead-To-Head: Shimabukuro 1 - 3 Schoolkate
They have played 9 sets in total, with Shimabukuro winning 4 and Schoolkate winning 5. The last match between Shimabukuro and Schoolkate was at the Ilkley Challenger, 13-06-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Grass, with Tristan Schoolkate getting the victory 3-6 6-3 7-6(4).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sho Shimabukuro | 1 |
| Tristan Schoolkate | 3 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Ilkley Challenger(13-06-2025)
Tristan Schoolkate
Sho Shimabukuro
3
6
6
3
7
6
| Shimabukuro | Stats | Schoolkate |
|---|---|---|
| 40% (8-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 63% (34-20) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 3 |
| 186 | Ranking | 104 |
| 135 | Highest Rank | 102 |
| 27 | Age | 24 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 5 |
| 61% (248-159) | Career Total W/L | 59% (203-141) |
| $323,505 | Career Prize Money | $500,350 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 2 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
11 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
Upcoming Match
- / Quarterfinals
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sinner VS Djokovic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Anisimova VS Swiatek PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
12 Jul 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shimabukuro VS Schoolkate H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
98)
17
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
25 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
98)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
| 6-2 ret. |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve %
65%
(
15 of
23)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
32
Total Points Won
18
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
6
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| 5-7 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
11
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
33 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
88)
97
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
Shimabukuro VS Schoolkate H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 43 | Games Won | 45 |
| 17 | Aces (Total) | 41 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 13 |
| 1:36:15 | Average Match Time | 1:36:15 |
| 59% (155/263) | 1st Serve % | 60% (171/284) |
| 71% (110/155) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (126/171) |
| 56% (60/108) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (61/113) |
| 47% (7/15) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (7/18) |
| 34% (97/284) | Return Points Win % | 35% (93/263) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 67% (3/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 67% (3/2) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Shimabukuro vs Schoolkate Match Preview :
- Can second serve performance predict the match outcome? Recently, Schoolkate has a slightly stronger second serve success at 44.34% compared to Shimabukuro's 40.23%.
- In return games, Schoolkate again holds an edge, winning 48.99% of points on opponents' second serves, versus Shimabukuro’s 45.03%. However, Shimabukuro excels in first serve returns with a 29.24% success rate, surpassing Schoolkate’s 23.29%.
- Under pressure, Schoolkate has demonstrated better breakpoint saving abilities (59.09%) than Shimabukuro (51.82%), indicating stronger mental resilience during crucial moments.
- Over the past year, both players have shown similar overall match win rates, with Shimabukuro at 56.25% and Schoolkate close behind at 55.7%.
- Both players have their best career performances on grass courts, with a 68% win rate. What about their worst surfaces? Shimabukuro underperforms on indoor hard courts, while Schoolkate struggles on clay.
- Analyzing playing level, Schoolkate has a slight advantage in performance in Challengers/ITF tournaments, winning 60.34% of matches compared to Shimabukuro’s 58.97%.
- In previous confrontations, they are evenly matched with one win each in direct encounters, and both have secured three set victories against each other.
- The deciding set history between them favors Schoolkate, having won the only deciding set they played.
- Neither player has been involved in a tiebreaker against each other, suggesting limited data for pressure testing in such situations.
- Focusing on recent form, Shimabukuro has a conversion rate of 32.93% for breakpoints, higher than Schoolkate's 29.08%, highlighting opportunistic gameplay.
- When games reach a deciding set, Schoolkate is more successful, with a 52% win rate, compared to Shimabukuro's 42%.
- Both have competed against opponents with almost identical average ranks in the last year, indicating a comparable level of player quality faced.
Editorial Prediction (June 13, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match promises to be closely contested as both players exhibit similar win percentages over the past year. Schoolkate's slightly superior recent second serve performance and mental strength in pressure situations may provide a slight edge.
While Shimabukuro translates more break-point opportunities into breaks, Schoolkate's overall steadiness in tight matches, especially in deciding sets, cannot be overlooked. Their head-to-head matches highlight this balance as neither player holds a definitive advantage.
Taking into account recent trends and performance under pressure, Schoolkate is favored to narrowly claim victory in this matchup. However, expect a highly competitive and exciting duel.
Shimabukuro vs Schoolkate Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Sho Shimabukuro Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Garrett Johns
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Christian Langmo
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
54
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
66%
(
83 of
126)
1st Serve %
55%
(
63 of
115)
17
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
63 of
83)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
50 of
63)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
39 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
35 of
115)
122
Total Points Won
119
|
3-6 7-6(8) 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Aziz Dougaz
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
7
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
35 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
102)
109
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
98)
17
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
25 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
98)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
James Kent Trotter
64%
(
81 of
126)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
15
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
2
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
38%
(
17 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
40%
(
50 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
87)
111
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Tristan Schoolkate Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 6-7(5) 7-6(5) 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Alex Bolt
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
10
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
6
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(4) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rei Sakamoto
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
7
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Andre Ilagan
48%
(
40 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
11
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
7
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Yi Zhou
50%
(
54 of
109)
1st Serve %
63%
(
77 of
123)
15
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
81%
(
44 of
54)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
55 of
77)
55%
(
30 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
35 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
47 of
123)
121
Total Points Won
111
|
7-6(5) 6-7(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
46%
(
33 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
7
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
66%
(
56 of
85)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
93
Total Points Won
75
|
6-7(4) 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Barrios Vera
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
5
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
5
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
15 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (248/159) | Win/Loss | 59% (203/141) |
| 58% (556/399) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (452/356) |
| 53% (4911/4296) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (4140/3750) |
| 62% (183/112) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (134/94) |
| 61% (17/11) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (24/24) |
| 55% (32/26) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (15/10) |
| 62% (16/10) | Grass Win/Loss | 70% (30/13) |
| 0.35 | Aces Per Game | 0.62 |
| 1564 | Aces Total | 2372 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.37 |
| 1105 | Total Double Faults | 1429 |
| 1:31:27 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 433.09 | Average Opponent Rank | 407.5 |
| 56% (14682/26142) | 1st Serve % | 60% (14508/24080) |
| 71% (10355/14682) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (10758/14508) |
| 51% (5885/11460) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (4623/9572) |
| 45% (1132/2541) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (909/2303) |
| 40% (10418/26107) | Return Points Win % | 38% (9376/24438) |
| 56% (10/8) | Slam W/L | 41% (7/10) |
| 33% (1/2) | Masters W/L | 60% (3/2) |
| 50% (2/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 37% (7/12) | Main Tour W/L | 43% (6/8) |
| 56% (89/70) | Challenger W/L | 58% (98/71) |
| 68% (139/65) | Futures W/L | 64% (89/50) |
| 61% (243/396) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (196/334) |
| 50% (4/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 63% (5/8) |
| 42% (65/154) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (78/155) |
| 56% (76/136) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (66/110) |
| 86% (243/209) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (178/160) |
| 14% (243/33) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (178/18) |
| 23% (164/38) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (166/43) |
Shimabukuro vs. Schoolkate Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
