Y. Zhou
To Win
S. Shimabukuro
To Win
Sho Shimabukuro vs James Kent Trotter Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L W W W L
Form
W L W W L W L W W LH2H: Shimabukuro 1 - 0 Trotter
They have played 3 sets in total, with Shimabukuro winning 2 and Trotter winning 1. The last match between Shimabukuro and Trotter was at the Ilkley Challenger, 11-06-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Grass, with Sho Shimabukuro getting the victory 6-3 4-6 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sho Shimabukuro | 1 |
| James Kent Trotter | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Ilkley Challenger(11-06-2025)
Sho Shimabukuro
James Kent Trotter
6
3
4
6
6
4
| Shimabukuro | Stats | Trotter |
|---|---|---|
| 44% (11-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 54% (19-16) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 208 | Ranking | 195 |
| 135 | Highest Rank | 170 |
| 27 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 3 |
| 61% (251-161) | Career Total W/L | 59% (109-75) |
| $323,505 | Career Prize Money | $120,795 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Jong VS Poljicak PREDICTION Clay
Plava Laguna Croatia Open - Umag atp
20 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Palicova VS Hon PREDICTION Hard
Prague Open - Prague wta
21 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shimabukuro VS Trotter H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 4-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
James Kent Trotter
64%
(
81 of
126)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
15
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
2
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
38%
(
17 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
40%
(
50 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
87)
111
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
Shimabukuro VS Trotter H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 13 |
| 15 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:31:17 | Average Match Time | 2:31:17 |
| 64% (81/126) | 1st Serve % | 56% (49/87) |
| 73% (59/81) | 1st Serve Win % | 78% (38/49) |
| 38% (17/45) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (14/38) |
| 50% (3/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 12% (2/17) |
| 40% (35/87) | Return Points Win % | 40% (50/126) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Shimabukuro vs Trotter Match Preview :
- Recent performance in second serve points: Shimabukuro claims 40.56% compared to Trotter's 49.14%. This is a significant aspect as it often correlates with match outcomes. Which player is stronger here? Trotter has the edge.
- Return game analysis: Shimabukuro leads in returning second serves with 42.59% success, whereas Trotter has 40.26%. On first serve returns, Shimabukuro is again dominant, winning 29.55% of points in contrast to Trotter's 20.44%.
- Handling pressure: Trotter shows stronger breakpoint resilience, saving 58.85% against Shimabukuro's 51.92%. Could this be decisive? Quite possibly, as it influences critical match moments.
- Overall match performance: Trotter boasts a higher annual win rate of 61.67% over Shimabukuro's 55.32%.
- Surface preference: Shimabukuro dominates on Grass with a 67% win rate, but struggles on Indoor Hard at 55%. Trotter excels on Indoor Hard with 65% but finds Clay challenging at 36%.
- Tournament play level: Both players primarily compete in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, with Trotter winning a higher percentage of matches (66.67% vs. Shimabukuro’s 57.89%).
- Quality of opponents: Shimabukuro has faced tougher competition, opposing players with an average rank of 222.47 versus Trotter's 277.63.
- Deciding set performance: Trotter excels, winning 74% of deciding sets compared to Shimabukuro’s 39%. How crucial might this be? Very significant, particularly in tight matches.
- Breakpoint conversion: Shimabukuro has a slight advantage, converting 38.46% of chances, while Trotter converts 32.1%.
Editorial Prediction (June 11, 2025, UTC):
In evaluating the upcoming match between Shimabukuro and Trotter, several factors stand out. Trotter holds a significant advantage in second serve performance and is more adept at saving break points under pressure, both critical for maintaining match momentum.
While Shimabukuro exhibits better return game statistics, especially on first serve returns, Trotter's overall higher win rate and proficiency in deciding sets cannot be overlooked. Trotter's aptitude on Indoor Hard surfaces, which aligns with their exceptional breakpoint saving percentage, further solidifies their position.
Considering these metrics and the context of recent performance, Trotter is projected to have the upper hand in their forthcoming encounter.
Shimabukuro vs Trotter Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Sho Shimabukuro Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Blockx
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Rio Noguchi
49%
(
49 of
99)
1st Serve %
56%
(
59 of
106)
6
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
48%
(
24 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Juan Carlos Manuel Aguilar
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
76%
(
32 of
42)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
65%
(
71 of
110)
1st Serve %
60%
(
71 of
118)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
42 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
118)
117
Total Points Won
111
|
7-6(3) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alexander Blockx
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
56 of
92)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
26%
(
19 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
76
|
6-1 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Garrett Johns
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Christian Langmo
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
54
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Li Tu
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
66%
(
83 of
126)
1st Serve %
55%
(
63 of
115)
17
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
63 of
83)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
50 of
63)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
39 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
35 of
115)
122
Total Points Won
119
|
3-6 7-6(8) 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
view more
James Kent Trotter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Eliot Spizzirri
Player
James Kent Trotter
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
7 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Patrick Kypson
53%
(
58 of
109)
1st Serve %
68%
(
75 of
110)
20
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
57 of
75)
65%
(
33 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
32 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
35 of
110)
112
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(5) 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Nicolas Arseneault
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
11
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Luka Pavlovic
Player
James Kent Trotter
60%
(
89 of
149)
1st Serve %
70%
(
86 of
123)
16
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
7
70%
(
62 of
89)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
63 of
86)
58%
(
35 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
17)
35%
(
52 of
149)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
42 of
123)
139
Total Points Won
133
|
6-3 6-7(5) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Calvin Hemery
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
78%
(
66 of
85)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Barrios Vera
Player
James Kent Trotter
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Colton Smith
62%
(
57 of
92)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
7
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
29 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
71)
84
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Marc-Andrea Huesler
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
113)
16
Aces
15
5
Double Faults
8
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
46 of
61)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
33 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
40 of
113)
107
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (251/161) | Win/Loss | 59% (109/75) |
| 58% (563/405) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (237/191) |
| 53% (4972/4354) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2232/2043) |
| 62% (186/114) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (62/42) |
| 61% (17/11) | Clay Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) |
| 55% (32/26) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (39/22) |
| 62% (16/10) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) |
| 0.35 | Aces Per Game | 0.71 |
| 1591 | Aces Total | 1491 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 1121 | Total Double Faults | 540 |
| 1:31:38 | Average Match Time | 1:40:17 |
| 432.2 | Average Opponent Rank | 384.54 |
| 56% (14913/26545) | 1st Serve % | 59% (7387/12420) |
| 70% (10509/14913) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (5645/7387) |
| 51% (5978/11632) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (2568/5033) |
| 44% (1147/2578) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (375/995) |
| 40% (10570/26498) | Return Points Win % | 36% (4488/12431) |
| 56% (10/8) | Slam W/L | 57% (4/3) |
| 33% (1/2) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (2/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 37% (7/12) | Main Tour W/L | 29% (2/5) |
| 56% (92/72) | Challenger W/L | 61% (80/51) |
| 68% (139/65) | Futures W/L | 61% (23/15) |
| 61% (246/401) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (107/182) |
| 50% (4/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (66/155) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (49/91) |
| 56% (78/139) | Deciding Set Win % | 66% (41/62) |
| 86% (246/212) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (93/84) |
| 13% (246/33) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (93/9) |
| 23% (166/38) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (91/25) |
Shimabukuro vs. Trotter Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
