Shintaro Mochizuki vs Filip Misolic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 15 Aug at 06:44 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Mochizuki vs F. Misolic

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUT
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Mochizuki 1 - 0 Misolic
They have played 3 sets in total, with Shintaro Mochizuki winning 2 and Filip Misolic winning 1. The last match between Shintaro Mochizuki and Filip Misolic was at the Sumter Challenger, 15-08-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Shintaro Mochizuki getting the victory 6-4 4-6 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mochizuki | 1 |
| Misolic | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) Sumter Challenger(08-15-25)
S. Mochizuki vs F. Misolic H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $967,880 | Career Prize Money | $644,425 |
| 54.50% (218-182) | Career Total W/L | 62.17% (212-129) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 10 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 40.00% (4-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (9-9) |
S. Mochizuki vs F. Misolic Match Preview:
- Recent second serve performance shows Misolic winning 43.14% of points, slightly trailing Mochizuki's 44.78%. How critical is this difference? It often predicts match outcomes.
- In return games, Mochizuki has been more dominant, capturing 48.33% of their opponent's second serve points compared to Misolic's 44.4%.
- Both players are nearly identical on first serve returns, with Misolic at 28.29% and Mochizuki at 28.8%.
- Under pressure, Misolic displays resilience by saving 54.65% of breakpoints, outpacing Mochizuki's 49.29%.
- In the past year, Misolic has secured 71.23% of matches, while Mochizuki has emerged victorious in 59.46% of games.
- When it comes to surface preference, Misolic excels on Clay with a 68% win rate, whereas Mochizuki is most effective on Grass at 58%.
- At the Challenger/ITF level, Misolic boasts a 69.39% win ratio, slightly above Mochizuki's performance at 61.54%.
- Interestingly, Misolic has been facing opponents with a higher average ranking (255.44) compared to Mochizuki's opponents, who average rank at 246.95.
- In a deciding set scenario, Misolic shows commendable performance by winning 83% of such sets. Does Mochizuki match up? They manage a 57% win rate in similar situations.
- Both players are effective at converting breakpoints, with Misolic converting 34.77% and Mochizuki closely matching at 34.75%.
Editorial Prediction (August 15, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze the pre-match statistics, certain patterns emerge. Misolic has shown formidable performance on Clay and is impressive in high-pressure situations, having a higher breakpoint save percentage than Mochizuki. Furthermore, Misolic's ability to clinch deciding sets at a rate of 83% over the past year gives them a decided edge if the match reaches such a climax.
Mochizuki, on the other hand, has exhibited stronger return games and has been playing against slightly better-ranked opponents. However, they have not been as reliable in pressure moments or decisive sets compared to Misolic, based on the historical data.
While both players display their strengths with only a slight edge for Mochizuki on service returns, the consistency and composure of Misolic under pressure situations could be the decisive factor for the upcoming encounter. Consequently, it seems probable that Misolic may emerge as the victor in this upcoming match.
Shintaro Mochizuki vs Filip Misolic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Mochizuki vs F. Misolic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 14 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:7:56 | Average Match Time | 2:7:56 |
| 56% (49/87) | 1st Serve % | 60% (57/95) |
| 69% (34/49) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (32/57) |
| 37% (14/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (15/38) |
| 58% (7/12) | Break Pts Won % | 55% (6/11) |
| 51% (48/95) | Return Points Win % | 45% (39/87) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Mochizuki Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | ||
Q3 | L | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(3) 3-6 6-4 | ||
QF | L | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | ||
F. Misolic Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-7(3) 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 1-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 7-6(6) | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||

S. Mochizuki vs F. Misolic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.50% (218/182) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.17% (212/129) |
| 52.84% (502/448) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.68% (462/339) |
| 50.31% (4510/4455) | Games Win/Loss | 52.63% (4029/3626) |
| 54.91% (123/101) | Hard Win/Loss | 43.75% (21/27) |
| 57.55% (61/45) | Clay Win/Loss | 67.87% (169/80) |
| 41.03% (16/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (19/19) |
| 58.06% (18/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (3/3) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 896 | Aces Total | 910 |
| 0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1662 | Total Double Faults | 797 |
| 1:41:49 | Average Match Time | 1:35:12 |
| 402.06 | Average Opponent Rank | 363.29 |
| 56% (15888/28266) | 1st Serve % | 59% (13388/22883) |
| 66% (10485/15888) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (9091/13388) |
| 47% (5809/12378) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (4805/9495) |
| 44% (1409/3175) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (996/2277) |
| 42% (12116/28553) | Return Points Win % | 40% (9000/22295) |
| 60.61% (20/13) | Slam W/L | 60.00% (15/10) |
| 42.86% (9/12) | Masters W/L | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 0.00% (0/4) | Cups W/L | 100.00% (2/0) |
| 38.46% (15/24) | Main Tour W/L | 58.18% (32/23) |
| 56.34% (120/93) | Challenger W/L | 59.74% (92/62) |
| 60.00% (54/36) | Futures W/L | 69.70% (69/30) |
| 54% (207/381) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (205/329) |
| 45% (5/11) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 63% (5/8) |
| 57% (66/115) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 63% (65/104) |
| 55% (78/143) | Deciding Set Win % | 68% (75/111) |
| 83% (209/174) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (189/170) |
| 16% (209/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (189/19) |
| 22% (191/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (151/41) |