Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sherazad Benamar vs Stacey Fung Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Benamar vs Fung analysis and find out who is favored!
Sherazad Benamar vs Stacey Fung Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Benamar has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Fung has won 45.59%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Benamar, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fung has won 54.61%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 39.77% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Benamar has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fung has saved 52.72% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Benamar has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Fung winning 55.77% (W/L 29/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Benamar has played against opponents with an average rank of while Fung has played against players with an average rank of 253.13.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Benamar has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fung has won 31% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Benamar has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fung has converted 46.51% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Benamar 0 - 0 Fung
N/A
Rank
High
35
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
262
Rank
222
High
27
Age
Plays
Form
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
0% (0-0)
Career Total W/L
64% (142-81)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
47% (8-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sherazad Benamar | Stacey Fung |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 47% (8/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (20/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (191/188) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 43% (6/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.16 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 29 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 46 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:57:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 354.88 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (760/1207) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 61% (466/760) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (192/447) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 51% (76/150) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (554/1194) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 53% (8/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (8/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 80% (10/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (10/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (7/0) |
Sherazad Benamar Recent Matches Played
Before:
No Past Matches Available
Stacey Fung Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats 
Stacey Fung
Player
Destanee Aiava
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
39 of
71)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stacey Fung
Player
Hanna Chang
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stacey Fung
Player
Dalayna Hewitt
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
0
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
7
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stacey Fung
Player
Momoko Kobori
65%
(
66 of
101)
1st Serve %
63%
(
66 of
105)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
50%
(
50 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
105)
100
Total Points Won
106
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naho Sato
Player
Stacey Fung
65%
(
70 of
108)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
1
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
46 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
103
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lanlana Tararudee
Player
Stacey Fung
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Claire Liu
Player
Stacey Fung
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victoria Rodriguez
Player
Stacey Fung
72%
(
57 of
79)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
49%
(
39 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
53 of
96)
93
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stacey Fung
Player
Jessie Aney
64%
(
68 of
106)
1st Serve %
47%
(
40 of
86)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
47 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Benamar Vs Fung Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
