Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Shay Bar Menahem vs Niels Visker Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Menahem vs Visker analysis and find out who is favored!
Shay Bar Menahem vs Niels Visker Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Menahem has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Visker has won 53.04%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Menahem, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Visker has won 47.89%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 29.76% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Menahem has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Visker has saved 69.61% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Menahem has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Visker winning 65% (W/L 52/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Menahem has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 25/ 19), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Visker has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 43/ 20), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 64/ 40).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Menahem winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Menahem winning 2 and Visker winning 1. The last match between Menahem and Visker was at the M15 Heraklion, 16-10-2022, Q1 round, Hard with Shay Bar Menahem getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Menahem and Visker have played a deciding set 1 times, with Menahem winning 1 times and Visker 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Menahem winning 0, and Visker 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Menahem has played against opponents with an average rank of while Visker has played against players with an average rank of 138.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Menahem has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Visker has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Menahem has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Visker has converted 40.28% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Menahem 1 - 0 Visker
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
592
Rank
592
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
55% (26-21)
Career Total W/L
64% (114-64)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
71% (20-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Shay Bar Menahem | Niels Visker |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 19 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-0 10-7 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Shay Bar Menahem | Niels Visker |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (20/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (41/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (318/275) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 73% (8/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 75% (6/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.76 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 220 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 73 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:29:42 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 115.57 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (1203/1904) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 76% (912/1203) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 51% (357/700) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 43% (62/144) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (658/1812) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (20/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (19/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 91% (10/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 91% (22/20) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 9% (22/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (6/0) |
Shay Bar Menahem Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Neil Oberleitner
Player
Shay Bar Menahem
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve %
75%
(
64 of
85)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
28%
(
7 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
40 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shay Bar Menahem
Player
Christos Keisidis
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
17 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
54
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Tim Sandkaulen
Player
Shay Bar Menahem
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-7(6) 13-11 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Shay Bar Menahem
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shay Bar Menahem
Player
Jonathan Baron
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
64 of
88)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
11
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yanki Erel
Player
Shay Bar Menahem
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
78%
(
42 of
54)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Shay Bar Menahem
Player
Aaron Cohen
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Niels Visker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Liam Gavrielides
Player
Niels Visker
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
54%
(
53 of
99)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
9
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
43 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
112
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Pavel Verbin
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
75%
(
69 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Jasza Szajrych
54%
(
48 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Niels Visker
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Eero Vasa
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Deney Wassermann
50%
(
16 of
32)
1st Serve %
58%
(
15 of
26)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
10 of
16)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
11 of
15)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
30
Total Points Won
28
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Lorenzo Carboni
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Niels Visker
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Daniel Khazime
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
14 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Menahem Vs Visker Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Niels Visker
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
