Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Shahar Peer vs Kimiko Date Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Peer vs Date analysis and find out who is favored!
Shahar Peer vs Kimiko Date Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Peer has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Date has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Peer, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Date has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Peer has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Date has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Peer has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Date winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Peer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 247/ 165), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 18/ 23). Date has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 19/ 13), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 30% (W/L 9/ 21).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Peer winning 1 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Peer winning 3 and Date winning 4. The last match between Peer and Date was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 17-01-2013, Second, Hard with Kimiko Date getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:30:17.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Peer and Date have played a deciding set 1 times, with Peer winning 0 times and Date 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Peer winning 0, and Date 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Peer has played against opponents with an average rank of while Date has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Peer has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Date has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Peer has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Date has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Peer 1 - 2 Date
Ret.
Rank
11
High
36
Age
R
Plays
1
Total2
1
Hard2
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
46
High
53
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
58% (388-277)
Career Total W/L
56% (217-173)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,894,734
Career Prize Money
$576,029
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Shahar Peer | Kimiko Date |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 4 |
| Games Won | 36 | 34 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:17 | 1:30:17 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (162/235) | 68% (159/234) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 56% (90/162) | 53% (84/159) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 42% (31/73) | 47% (35/75) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (16/38) | 45% (15/33) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (115/234) | 49% (114/235) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-5 |
Stats 
Kimiko Date
Player
Shahar Peer
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
47%
(
25 of
53)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
50%
(
36 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
| 3-6 7-6(5) 7-5 |
Stats
Kimiko Date
Player
Shahar Peer
68%
(
77 of
113)
1st Serve %
76%
(
87 of
115)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
51 of
87)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
46%
(
52 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
55 of
115)
116
Total Points Won
112
|
||||
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats
Shahar Peer
Player
Kimiko Date
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Shahar Peer | Kimiko Date |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Shahar Peer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktorija Golubic
Player
Shahar Peer
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paula Cristina Goncalves
Player
Shahar Peer
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
48%
(
29 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Kateryna Volodko
Player
Shahar Peer
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Shahar Peer
Player
Tena Lukas
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
91)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Shahar Peer
Player
Valeria Gorlats
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
33%
(
19 of
58)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Ipek Soylu
Player
Shahar Peer
57%
(
58 of
102)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
1
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
4
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
45 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
44 of
88)
101
Total Points Won
89
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kristyna Pliskova
Player
Shahar Peer
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
12
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
3
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jana Cepelova
Player
Shahar Peer
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronica Cepede Royg
Player
Shahar Peer
74%
(
62 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
10
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Glushko
Player
Shahar Peer
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Kimiko Date Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandra Krunic
Player
Kimiko Date
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve %
52%
(
17 of
33)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
6 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
51
Total Points Won
13
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emina Bektas
Player
Kimiko Date
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
11
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
3-6 6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Usue Maitane Arconada
Player
Kimiko Date
54%
(
47 of
87)
1st Serve %
76%
(
54 of
71)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
39 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
90
Total Points Won
68
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sohyun Park
Player
Kimiko Date
48%
(
16 of
33)
1st Serve %
79%
(
31 of
39)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
13 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
42
Total Points Won
30
|
6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Lin Zhu
Player
Kimiko Date
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
81%
(
43 of
53)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amandine Hesse
Player
Kimiko Date
60%
(
59 of
99)
1st Serve %
76%
(
74 of
98)
8
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
41 of
74)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
43 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
98)
104
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chang Liu
Player
Kimiko Date
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
74%
(
60 of
81)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Peer Vs Date Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
