Prediction of Shahar Peer vs Anna-Lena Friedsam Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
S. Peer vs A. Friedsam

Shahar Peer

ISR

0

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

1.70m

Height

1.74m

Ret.

C. Rank

193

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$2.9M

Career Money

$1.1M

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Anna-Lena Friedsam

GER

0

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

1.70m

Height

1.74m

Ret.

C. Rank

193

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$2.9M

Career Money

$1.1M

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Head-to-head: Peer 0 - 1 Friedsam

They have played 3 sets in total, with Shahar Peer winning 1 and Anna-Lena Friedsam winning 2. The last match between Anna-Lena Friedsam and Shahar Peer was at the The OEC Taipei WTA Ladies Open - Taipei, 06-11-2014, Round: R2, Surface: Carpet, with Anna-Lena Friedsam getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Peer	0
Friedsam	1

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) The OEC Taipei WTA Ladies Open - Taipei(11-06-14)

Stats

Anna-Lena Friedsam

Shahar Peer

S. Peer vs A. Friedsam H2H Profile

S. Peer	Stats	A. Friedsam
$2,894,734	Career Prize Money	$1,078,782
58.08% (388-280)	Career Total W/L	60.00% (399-266)
0	Indoor	1
9	Titles	15
0	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0.00% (0-2)

S. Peer vs A. Friedsam Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shahar Peer has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Anna-Lena Friedsam has won 43.45%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shahar Peer, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Anna-Lena Friedsam has won 50.29%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 32.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Shahar Peer has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Anna-Lena Friedsam has saved 54.48% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Shahar Peer has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Anna-Lena Friedsam winning 64.41% (W/L 38/21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Shahar Peer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 247/165), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 18/23). Anna-Lena Friedsam has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 123/60), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 16/19).
Player level: In the last year, Shahar Peer has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Anna-Lena Friedsam has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.89% of matches (W/L 31/14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Shahar Peer winning 0 times and Anna-Lena Friedsam being victorious 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Shahar Peer winning 1 and Anna-Lena Friedsam winning 2.
The last match between Shahar Peer and Anna-Lena Friedsam was at the The OEC Taipei WTA Ladies Open - Taipei, 06-11-2014, Round: R2, Surface: Carpet, with Anna-Lena Friedsam getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:49:20.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shahar Peer has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Anna-Lena Friedsam has played against players with an average rank of 254.02.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shahar Peer has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Anna-Lena Friedsam has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Shahar Peer has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Anna-Lena Friedsam has converted 39.34% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Shahar Peer vs Anna-Lena Friedsam Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

S. Peer vs A. Friedsam H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

S. Peer	Stats	A. Friedsam
0	H2H Matches Won	1
1	Sets Won	2
11	Games Won	15
0	Aces (Total)	8
5	Total Double Faults	3
1:49:20	Average Match Time	1:49:20
69% (56/81)	1st Serve %	70% (62/88)
55% (31/56)	1st Serve Win %	65% (40/62)
56% (14/25)	2nd Serve Win %	50% (13/26)
27% (3/11)	Break Pts Won %	38% (5/13)
40% (35/88)	Return Points Win %	44% (36/81)
0% (0/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

S. Peer Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Abierto Monterrey Afirme - Monterrey - 29-02-2016
Q1 Viktorija GolubicV. Golubic	L	6-4 7-5	Stats
Rio Open - Rio de Janeiro - 15-02-2016
Q1 Paula Cristina GoncalvesP. Cristina	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
Fed Cup, Europe/Africa Zone Group I - 01-02-2016
Rubber 1 Kateryna VolodkoK. Volodko	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
Rubber 1 Tena LukasT. Lukas	W	3-6 6-1 6-2	Stats
Rubber 1 Valeria GorlatsV. Gorlats	W	6-0 6-3	Stats

View All

A. Friedsam Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Open In Arte Angers Loire - Angers - 01-12-2025
R1 Teodora KostovicT. Kostovic	W	6-3 7-6(7)	Stats
Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F - 10-11-2025
Rubber 1 Jeline VandrommeJ. Vandromme	L	7-6(0) 2-6 6-3	Stats
Austin 125 - Austin - 03-11-2025
R1 Iva JovicI. Jovic	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
Torneo Internazionale - Rovereto - 20-10-2025
QF Oksana SelekhmetevaO. Selekhmeteva	L	3-6 6-2 6-3	Stats
R2 Linda KlimovicovaL. Klimovicova	W	4-6 6-1 6-2	Stats

View All

S. Peer vs A. Friedsam Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

S. Peer	Stats	A. Friedsam
58.35% (388/277)	YTD Win/Loss	60.00% (399/266)
56.14% (855/668)	Sets Win/Loss	58.04% (899/650)
52.37% (7235/6580)	Games Win/Loss	53.49% (7697/6692)
59.95% (247/165)	Hard Win/Loss	55.67% (108/86)
57.53% (84/62)	Clay Win/Loss	59.66% (139/94)
59.09% (39/27)	Indoor Hard W/L	67.00% (136/67)
43.90% (18/23)	Grass Win/Loss	45.71% (16/19)
0.08	Aces Per Game	0.23
551	Aces Total	1586
0.23	Double Faults Per Game	0.24
1575	Total Double Faults	1710
1st Match	Average Match Time	1:11:49
515.15	Average Opponent Rank	467.41
65% (21212/32646)	1st Serve %	65% (22502/34674)
61% (12882/21212)	1st Serve Win %	65% (14678/22502)
44% (5081/11441)	2nd Serve Win %	46% (5595/12170)
48% (2024/4236)	Break Points Won % (Total)	45% (1714/3774)
46% (15135/32818)	Return Points Win %	43% (14623/34256)
57.14% (60/45)	Slam W/L	36.84% (21/36)
54.84% (85/70)	Masters W/L	33.33% (10/20)
61.76% (21/13)	Cups W/L	33.33% (2/4)
59.43% (189/129)	Main Tour W/L	52.88% (101/90)
62.26% (33/20)	Challenger W/L	67.95% (212/100)
0% (0/0)	Futures W/L	76.81% (53/16)
58% (384/659)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	60% (390/651)
100% (2/2)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	100% (1/1)
57% (71/125)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	52% (92/177)
58% (114/195)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (123/229)
87% (370/321)	1st Set Won, Won Match	85% (392/335)
13% (370/49)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	14% (392/56)
23% (295/67)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	23% (273/63)