Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sergiy Stakhovsky vs Sumit Nagal Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Stakhovsky vs Nagal analysis and find out who is favored!
Sergiy Stakhovsky vs Sumit Nagal Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Stakhovsky has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Nagal has won 55.61%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Stakhovsky, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nagal has won 54.03%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 32.87% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Stakhovsky has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nagal has saved 64.63% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Stakhovsky has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Nagal winning 64.71% (W/L 55/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Stakhovsky has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 206/ 151), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 112/ 132). Nagal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 214/ 124), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Stakhovsky winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Stakhovsky winning 1 and Nagal winning 2. The last match between Stakhovsky and Nagal was at the Prague Challenger, 06-05-2021, Second, Clay with Sumit Nagal getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:55:39.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Stakhovsky and Nagal have played a deciding set 1 times, with Stakhovsky winning 0 times and Nagal 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Stakhovsky winning 0, and Nagal 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Stakhovsky has played against opponents with an average rank of while Nagal has played against players with an average rank of 284.86.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Stakhovsky has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nagal has won 46% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Stakhovsky has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nagal has converted 47.19% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Stakhovsky 0 - 1 Nagal
678
Rank
31
High
38
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
80
Rank
80
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
55% (676-557)
Career Total W/L
61% (317-204)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
64% (18-10)
$2,604,568
Career Prize Money
$434,190
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Stakhovsky VS Nagal H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Sumit Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 11 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:39 | 1:55:39 |
| 1st Serve % | 47% (44/94) | 74% (60/81) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 57% (25/44) | 70% (42/60) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (23/50) | 43% (9/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 43% (6/14) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (30/81) | 49% (46/94) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Stakhovsky VS Nagal H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Sumit Nagal
Player
Sergiy Stakhovsky
74%
(
60 of
81)
1st Serve %
47%
(
44 of
94)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Sumit Nagal |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 64% (18/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 65% (44/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (359/288) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 64% (14/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 55 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.12 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 38 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:56:56 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 214.64 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 70% (1475/2097) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (992/1475) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 56% (347/622) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 48% (93/193) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (820/2042) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 80% (4/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (9/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 65% (17/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 76% (21/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 24% (21/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 29% (7/2) |
Sergiy Stakhovsky Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Jeff Wolf
Player
Sergiy Stakhovsky
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Sergiy Stakhovsky
71%
(
68 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
71 of
113)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
47 of
71)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
31%
(
30 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
113)
117
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sergiy Stakhovsky
Player
Norbert Gombos
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
63%
(
63 of
100)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
100)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 1-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sergiy Stakhovsky
Player
Dan Added
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
8
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sergiy Stakhovsky
Player
Dennis Novak
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jiri Lehecka
Player
Sergiy Stakhovsky
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Sergiy Stakhovsky
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sergiy Stakhovsky
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
52%
(
54 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
73 of
122)
5
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
7
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
54 of
73)
57%
(
28 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
33 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
46 of
122)
116
Total Points Won
109
|
6-3 6-7(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ergi Kirkin
Player
Sergiy Stakhovsky
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Sumit Nagal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Sumit Nagal
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
72%
(
26 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Flavio Cobolli
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Sumit Nagal
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Corentin Moutet
74%
(
66 of
89)
1st Serve %
80%
(
53 of
66)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
66)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Sumit Nagal
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
70%
(
70 of
100)
16
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
85%
(
51 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
32%
(
11 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
32 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Milos Raonic
Player
Sumit Nagal
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
9
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Sumit Nagal
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
76%
(
65 of
85)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
48 of
65)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
34 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
89
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Stefan Dostanic
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stakhovsky Vs Nagal Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
