Seone Mendez vs Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L L W L W W W
Form
L W L L L L W L L LHead To Head: Mendez 1 - 2 Kerkhove
They have played 6 sets in total, with Mendez winning 2 and Kerkhove winning 4. The last match between Mendez and Kerkhove was at the W50 Ystad, 19-06-2024, First, Clay with Seone Mendez getting the victory 6-0 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Seone Mendez | 1 |
| Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove | 2 |
W50 Ystad(19-06-2024)
| Mendez | Stats | Kerkhove |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 605 | Ranking | 781 |
| 198 | Highest Rank | 135 |
| 25 | Age | 33 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 13 | Titles | 10 |
| 61% (260-168) | Career Total W/L | 56% (510-394) |
| $75,400 | Career Prize Money | $509,214 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Paolini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
27 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Cerundolo VS Dimitrov PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
26 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-0 |
Stats 
Seone Mendez
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
70%
(
23 of
33)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
52
Total Points Won
19
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
Player
Seone Mendez
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
Player
Seone Mendez
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
81%
(
34 of
42)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 23 | Games Won | 24 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 11 |
| 1:1:0 | Average Match Time | 1:1:0 |
| 70% (105/150) | 1st Serve % | 72% (104/144) |
| 51% (54/105) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (62/104) |
| 58% (26/45) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (15/40) |
| 50% (10/20) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (10/21) |
| 47% (67/144) | Return Points Win % | 47% (70/150) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Seone Mendez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF | w/o | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Seone Mendez
Player
Alessandra Mazzola
74%
(
61 of
82)
1st Serve %
80%
(
77 of
96)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
96)
100
Total Points Won
78
|
6-1 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Seone Mendez
Player
Meritxell Teixido Garcia
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seone Mendez
Player
Lorena Solar Donoso
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Seone Mendez
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seone Mendez
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nuria Brancaccio
Player
Seone Mendez
87%
(
65 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
82
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Andrienko
Player
Seone Mendez
86%
(
59 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
49%
(
29 of
59)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
11 of
38)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
51%
(
35 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emeline Dartron
Player
Seone Mendez
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
74%
(
69 of
93)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seone Mendez
Player
Alize Lim
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
41%
(
17 of
41)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterine Gorgodze
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
98)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
98)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Kuczer
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
84%
(
75 of
89)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
87)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
38 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
87)
96
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
96)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
52 of
96)
91
Total Points Won
68
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
Player
Jessie Aney
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
0
Aces
15
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seone Mendez
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
70%
(
23 of
33)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
52
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mona Barthel
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
65%
(
55 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
95)
13
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arianna Zucchini
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
49%
(
40 of
82)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
3
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
5
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
36%
(
15 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
38 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
Player
Cristina Ramos Sierra
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charo Esquiva Banuls
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
73%
(
40 of
55)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (260/168) | Win/Loss | 56% (510/394) |
| 59% (566/399) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (1148/942) |
| 54% (4691/4033) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (10120/9341) |
| 43% (36/48) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (189/115) |
| 67% (219/110) | Clay Win/Loss | 53% (142/127) |
| 36% (5/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (154/124) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 47% (25/28) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 403 | Aces Total | 1060 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 966 | Total Double Faults | 2324 |
| 1:22:57 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 492.3 | Average Opponent Rank | 535.45 |
| 67% (16264/24356) | 1st Serve % | 64% (24966/38765) |
| 58% (9450/16264) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (15679/24966) |
| 46% (3730/8093) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (6150/13803) |
| 50% (1714/3423) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (2225/4870) |
| 49% (11878/24398) | Return Points Win % | 45% (17512/39075) |
| 30% (3/7) | Slam W/L | 45% (26/32) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 29% (2/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 27% (3/8) |
| 33% (6/12) | Main Tour W/L | 49% (53/56) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (147/115) | Challenger W/L | 59% (361/255) |
| 75% (104/34) | Futures W/L | 63% (65/38) |
| 61% (256/422) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (504/898) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 55% (42/77) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (104/215) |
| 56% (65/116) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (152/284) |
| 89% (248/221) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (484/422) |
| 10% (248/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (484/62) |
| 21% (179/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (420/87) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
