S. Ofner
To Win
D. Dzumhur
To Win
Sebastian Ofner vs Ivan Gakhov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L L W W L
Form
W L W L L W W W W WHead-2-Head: Ofner 0 - 0 Gakhov
They have played 4 sets in total, with Ofner winning 4 and Gakhov winning 0. The last match between Ofner and Gakhov was at the Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva, 19-05-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Sebastian Ofner getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sebastian Ofner | 0 |
| Ivan Gakhov | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva(19-05-2025)
Sebastian Ofner
Ivan Gakhov
6
1
6
2
Upcoming Match
15 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
15 Jul 2025 / First
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Mejia VS Basavareddy PREDICTION Hard
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos atp
16 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Walton VS Mendez PREDICTION Hard
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos atp
15 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Ivan Gakhov
44%
(
17 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Ivan Gakhov
48%
(
31 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 25 | Games Won | 10 |
| 12 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:13:48 | Average Match Time | 1:13:48 |
| 46% (48/104) | 1st Serve % | 58% (72/124) |
| 83% (40/48) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (40/72) |
| 63% (35/56) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (22/52) |
| 69% (9/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 14% (1/7) |
| 50% (62/124) | Return Points Win % | 28% (29/104) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ofner vs Gakhov Match Preview :
- Second Serve Performance: Ofner has recently secured 46.39% of points on their second serve, slightly less than Gakhov's 48.74%. How significant is this difference? It could imply a slight edge for Gakhov.
- Return Game Stats: Ofner has won 47.1% of opponents' second serve points; Gakhov edges ahead with 48.21%. Furthermore, Gakhov excels in first serve returns with 27.7% versus Ofner's 22.47%. Could this make Gakhov the favorite in extended rallies? Likely yes.
- Under Pressure: Ofner's ability to save breakpoints is 55.63%, marginally better than Gakhov's 54.78%, suggesting Ofner handles pressure slightly better.
- Win-Loss Overview: Gakhov has a higher win percentage over the last year at 61.63%, compared to Ofner's 56.76%, indicating Gakhov's recent form might provide an advantage.
- Best Surface Performance: Ofner thrives on grass with a 59% win rate, while Gakhov is best on clay with 63%. Since they previously played on clay, and Gakhov did not win, does this give Ofner an advantage regardless of the surface? Possibly.
- Level of Competition: Ofner has competed mainly on the Main tour with a slightly better win rate (57.14%) than Gakhov, who played mostly in lower-tier tournaments, winning 54.9%, suggesting Ofner may be more accustomed to high-level play.
- Direct Head-to-Head: Ofner leads their head-to-head with Gakhov 1-0, as well as winning all sets played so far. What does this indicate? It implies Ofner may have the psychological edge going forward.
- Opponent Quality: Ofner has played against stronger opponents with an average rank of 135.68, compared to Gakhov's 373.34. Does this support Ofner's higher level of experience? It certainly suggests so.
- Break Point Conversion: Gakhov has converted 35.43% of breakpoints compared to Ofner's 28.41%, pointing towards Gakhov's possibly better offensive strategy under pressure.
Editorial Prediction (May 18, 2025, UTC):
In examining recent performance statistics, it appears that Gakhov exhibits a slight advantage in second serve and return game statistics over Ofner. With marginally better numbers in both categories, Gakhov might have a small edge in baseline exchanges.
However, Ofner shows resilience under pressure with better breakpoint saving ability. His experience on the Main tour and history of facing higher-ranked opponents could factor in during crucial stages, especially during high-stakes moments in the match.
Historical data from their head-to-head encounter and Ofner's prior victory, even on Gakhov's favored surface, also suggest a psychological advantage.
Considering all these factors, while Gakhov's statistics are compelling, Ofner's past win and handling of high-pressure situations lean the prediction in his favor. Therefore, Sebastian Ofner is likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming match.
Ofner vs Gakhov Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Sebastian Ofner Recent Matches Played
Before:
No Recent Matches Available
Ivan Gakhov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Ryan Nijboer
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
2
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
9
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
85
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Jay Dylan Hara Friend
53%
(
70 of
131)
1st Serve %
61%
(
75 of
122)
3
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
3
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
49 of
75)
46%
(
28 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
43%
(
56 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
122)
127
Total Points Won
126
|
4-6 7-6(2) 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
42%
(
10 of
24)
1st Serve %
53%
(
9 of
17)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
100%
(
10 of
10)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
8 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
25
Total Points Won
16
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Abel Forger
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Dax Donders
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
71)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Ivan Gakhov
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
65)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christoph Negritu
Player
Ivan Gakhov
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Andrej Martin
45%
(
45 of
100)
1st Serve %
49%
(
49 of
101)
5
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
8
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
44%
(
24 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
41%
(
41 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
101)
104
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (380/285) | Win/Loss | 61% (531/339) |
| 55% (873/713) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (1186/852) |
| 51% (7927/7535) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (10223/9108) |
| 59% (109/76) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (50/42) |
| 57% (192/142) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (462/268) |
| 52% (49/46) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (19/28) |
| 59% (30/21) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.5 | Aces Per Game | 0.27 |
| 3806 | Aces Total | 2577 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1990 | Total Double Faults | 1961 |
| 1:27:13 | Average Match Time | 1:22:28 |
| 476.84 | Average Opponent Rank | 501.26 |
| 57% (25029/44227) | 1st Serve % | 61% (29447/48423) |
| 73% (18215/25029) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (20184/29447) |
| 50% (9596/19198) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (9463/18976) |
| 43% (1658/3889) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (2181/5225) |
| 38% (16724/43823) | Return Points Win % | 41% (20277/49510) |
| 52% (32/29) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/4) |
| 50% (10/10) | Masters W/L | 75% (3/1) |
| 25% (1/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (54/53) | Main Tour W/L | 32% (8/17) |
| 57% (161/123) | Challenger W/L | 51% (146/140) |
| 65% (121/66) | Futures W/L | 68% (374/177) |
| 58% (363/628) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (525/861) |
| 48% (13/27) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 52% (133/257) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (154/277) |
| 56% (126/226) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (174/302) |
| 85% (341/290) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (500/435) |
| 15% (341/51) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (500/64) |
| 27% (322/88) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (370/94) |
Ofner vs. Gakhov Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
