Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sebastian Fanselow vs Tennys Sandgren Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fanselow vs Sandgren analysis and find out who is favored!
Sebastian Fanselow vs Tennys Sandgren Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fanselow has won 50.66% of points on his second serve, while Sandgren has won 51.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fanselow, in recent form, has won 51.63% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sandgren has won 48.41%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.08% and 27.3% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fanselow has saved 60.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sandgren has saved 65% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fanselow has won 62.64% of matches played (W/L 57/ 34), with Sandgren winning 53.57% (W/L 30/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fanselow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 204/ 118), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 33/ 30). Sandgren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 241/ 175), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 11/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Fanselow has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75.51% of matches (W/L 37/ 12), where as Sandgren has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.25% of matches (W/L 27/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Fanselow winning 0 times. They have played 10 sets in total, with Fanselow winning 2 and Sandgren winning 8. The last match between Fanselow and Sandgren was at the Cleveland Challenger, 31-01-2024, Second, I.hard with Tennys Sandgren getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:22:18.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fanselow and Sandgren have played a deciding set 2 times, with Fanselow winning 0 times and Sandgren 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Fanselow winning 0, and Sandgren 3.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fanselow has played against opponents with an average rank of 232.44 while Sandgren has played against players with an average rank of 278.11.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fanselow has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sandgren has won 39% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fanselow has converted 39.02% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sandgren has converted 30.05% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fanselow 0 - 4 Sandgren
305
Rank
273
High
32
Age
R
Plays
0
Total4
0
Hard3
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
264
Rank
41
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
61% (352-228)
Career Total W/L
56% (420-324)
54% (15-13)
YTD W/L
60% (12-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$2,256,263
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sebastian Fanselow | Tennys Sandgren |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 4 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 8 |
| Games Won | 47 | 60 |
| Aces (Total) | 13 | 36 |
| DFs (Total) | 17 | 13 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:22:18 | 2:22:18 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (212/370) | 61% (218/360) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (134/212) | 72% (156/218) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (79/158) | 47% (67/142) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 32% (12/38) | 38% (17/45) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (137/360) | 42% (157/370) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/4) | 100% (4/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 100% (3/3) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (2/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (2/2) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 3-6 7-5 6-3 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
59%
(
55 of
93)
1st Serve %
54%
(
53 of
98)
11
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
| 6-4 7-6(7) |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
| 5-7 6-4 7-6(2) |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
63%
(
77 of
122)
1st Serve %
59%
(
64 of
108)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
39%
(
48 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
108)
119
Total Points Won
111
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sebastian Fanselow | Tennys Sandgren |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (15/13) | 60% (12/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (32/31) | 62% (31/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (316/314) | 53% (272/238) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 47% (7/8) | 50% (4/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (8/5) | 67% (4/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.44 | 0.89 |
| Aces Total | 135 | 221 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 75 | 58 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:19 | 1:55:49 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 235.39 | 300.8 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1156/1950) | 60% (961/1606) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (825/1156) | 78% (747/961) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (404/794) | 51% (329/645) |
| BPs Won% Total | 36% (69/192) | 32% (47/146) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (765/2033) | 35% (575/1620) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 47% (9/10) | 59% (10/7) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (14/27) | 60% (12/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (6/14) | 62% (8/13) |
| Deciding Set W% | 63% (5/8) | 30% (3/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (14/13) | 77% (13/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (14/1) | 23% (13/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (14/2) | 29% (7/2) |
Sebastian Fanselow Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
15
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jakub Nicod
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
8 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
57 of
100)
12
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Martyn Pawelski
65%
(
67 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
79 of
124)
11
Aces
15
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
59 of
79)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
32%
(
33 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
47 of
124)
117
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(4) 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Aleksandr Braynin
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
71%
(
85 of
119)
9
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
8
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
54 of
85)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
33 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
48 of
119)
116
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
David Poljak
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adria Soriano Barrera
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
67%
(
70 of
105)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
96)
13
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
7
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
40%
(
42 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(0) 0-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Tomas Curras Abasolo
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Federico Iannaccone
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tennys Sandgren Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Tennys Sandgren
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
37 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
113
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Martin Damm
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tennys Sandgren
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
43%
(
52 of
120)
8
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Stefan Kozlov
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Dmitry Popko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
7
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
3
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
10
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Tennys Sandgren
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
12
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
16
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
15
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Tennys Sandgren
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
64 of
106)
13
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
10
88%
(
38 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
24%
(
18 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
100
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Fanselow Vs Sandgren Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
