Sebastian Fanselow vs Martin Landaluce Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L L L L L L
Form
L L W L W W W L W LHead To Head: Fanselow 1 - 0 Landaluce
They have played 3 sets in total, with Fanselow winning 2 and Landaluce winning 1. The last match between Fanselow and Landaluce was at the M25 Tavira, 21-10-2023, Round: Semifinals, Surface: Hard, with Sebastian Fanselow getting the victory 3-6 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sebastian Fanselow | 1 |
| Martin Landaluce | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Tavira(21-10-2023)
Sebastian Fanselow
Martin Landaluce
3
6
6
2
6
2
| Fanselow | Stats | Landaluce |
|---|---|---|
| 30% (3-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 46% (11-13) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 682 | Ranking | 147 |
| 273 | Highest Rank | 133 |
| 33 | Age | 19 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 12 | Titles | 2 |
| 59% (369-256) | Career Total W/L | 54% (79-66) |
| $3,105 | Career Prize Money | $166,500 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Eala VS Arango PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Maia VS Baptiste PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Martin Landaluce
59%
(
58 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
7
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 10 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:23:0 | Average Match Time | 2:23:0 |
| 59% (58/98) | 1st Serve % | 60% (43/72) |
| 66% (38/58) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (26/43) |
| 50% (20/40) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (13/29) |
| 71% (5/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 27% (3/11) |
| 46% (33/72) | Return Points Win % | 41% (40/98) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sebastian Fanselow Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
44%
(
26 of
59)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joao Domingues
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Berger
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
55
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mario Gonzalez Fernandez
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
42 of
84)
1
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
6
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
77
Total Points Won
77
|
2-6 6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cezar Cretu
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christian Djonov
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
7
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
17 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
15 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Maik Steiner
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
13
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
33 of
41)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
22 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Ritschard
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Martin Landaluce Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Martin Landaluce
52%
(
50 of
97)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
62%
(
29 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
100
Total Points Won
83
|
6-0 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Murkel Dellien
63%
(
71 of
113)
1st Serve %
69%
(
77 of
112)
3
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
2
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
49 of
77)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
43 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
112)
114
Total Points Won
111
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Martin Landaluce
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Daniel Evans
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
8
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Jurij Rodionov
70%
(
72 of
103)
1st Serve %
56%
(
64 of
115)
2
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
10
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
44%
(
45 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
59 of
115)
117
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Barrios Vera
Player
Martin Landaluce
61%
(
82 of
135)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
55%
(
29 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
42%
(
57 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
112
Total Points Won
105
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Benjamin Hassan
58%
(
63 of
108)
1st Serve %
47%
(
56 of
120)
2
Aces
4
16
Double Faults
4
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
80%
(
8 of
10)
43%
(
46 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
59 of
120)
121
Total Points Won
107
|
7-5 5-7 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (369/256) | Win/Loss | 54% (79/66) |
| 57% (829/613) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (187/162) |
| 53% (7188/6336) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (1720/1628) |
| 63% (204/122) | Hard Win/Loss | 64% (39/22) |
| 56% (127/98) | Clay Win/Loss | 49% (34/36) |
| 52% (38/35) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43% (6/8) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
| 1784 | Aces Total | 538 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.36 |
| 1929 | Total Double Faults | 593 |
| 1:29:22 | Average Match Time | 1:52:49 |
| 509.92 | Average Opponent Rank | 335.24 |
| 59% (22150/37437) | 1st Serve % | 62% (6618/10621) |
| 69% (15348/22150) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (4531/6618) |
| 49% (7511/15286) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1954/4003) |
| 43% (1730/4020) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (458/1119) |
| 41% (15527/37601) | Return Points Win % | 40% (4371/10793) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 67% (4/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 20% (1/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 20% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/7) |
| 49% (124/130) | Challenger W/L | 56% (47/37) |
| 67% (244/122) | Futures W/L | 64% (27/15) |
| 59% (364/617) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (78/143) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 47% (71/152) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (24/48) |
| 52% (103/198) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (28/57) |
| 87% (361/314) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (78/64) |
| 13% (361/47) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (78/14) |
| 21% (264/55) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (67/15) |
Fanselow vs. Landaluce Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
