Sebastian Fanselow vs Cem Ilkel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fanselow vs Ilkel analysis and find out who is favored!
Sebastian Fanselow vs Cem Ilkel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fanselow has won 50.5% of points on his second serve, while Ilkel has won 47.69%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fanselow, in recent form, has won 52.84% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ilkel has won 51.48%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.13% and 24.95% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fanselow has saved 61.13% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ilkel has saved 54.32% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fanselow has won 62.64% of matches played (W/L 57/ 34), with Ilkel winning 39.58% (W/L 19/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fanselow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 204/ 118), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 33/ 30). Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 254/ 162), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Fanselow has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75.51% of matches (W/L 37/ 12), where as Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 12/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Fanselow winning 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Fanselow winning 3 and Ilkel winning 3. The last match between Fanselow and Ilkel was at the Oeiras 1 Challenger, 01-01-2024, First, I.hard with Cem Ilkel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:55:56.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fanselow and Ilkel have played a deciding set 2 times, with Fanselow winning 1 times and Ilkel 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fanselow winning 0, and Ilkel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fanselow has played against opponents with an average rank of 232.44 while Ilkel has played against players with an average rank of 236.83.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fanselow has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ilkel has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fanselow has converted 40.13% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ilkel has converted 44.34% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fanselow 1 - 1 Ilkel
12
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
12
Minor
305
Rank
273
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
415
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
5
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
Form
61% (352-228)
Career Total W/L
56% (400-309)
54% (15-13)
YTD W/L
44% (8-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$225,530
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Sebastian Fanselow | Cem Ilkel |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 3 | 3 |
Games Won | 31 | 25 |
Aces (Total) | 16 | 13 |
DFs (Total) | 6 | 9 |
Avg Match Time | 1:55:56 | 1:55:56 |
1st Serve % | 57% (91/161) | 56% (93/166) |
1st Serve Win% | 75% (68/91) | 71% (66/93) |
2nd Serve Win% | 54% (38/70) | 47% (34/73) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 53% (8/15) | 56% (5/9) |
Return Points W% | 40% (66/166) | 34% (55/161) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 3-6 7-5 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
52%
(
45 of
86)
8
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
5
87%
(
41 of
47)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
37 of
45)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
27 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
6-2 5-7 6-0 |
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Cem Ilkel
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
88)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
8
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
71
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Sebastian Fanselow | Cem Ilkel |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 54% (15/13) | 44% (8/10) |
Sets Win/Loss | 51% (32/31) | 43% (17/23) |
Games Win/Loss | 50% (316/314) | 46% (165/195) |
Hard Win/Loss | 47% (7/8) | 43% (3/4) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (8/5) | 45% (5/6) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.44 | 0.54 |
Aces Total | 135 | 94 |
DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.24 |
DFs Total | 75 | 42 |
Avg Match Time | 1:49:19 | 1:28:14 |
Avg Opp Rank | 235.39 | 162.39 |
1st Serve % | 59% (1156/1950) | 57% (616/1073) |
1st Serve W% | 71% (825/1156) | 72% (442/616) |
2nd Serve W% | 51% (404/794) | 46% (210/457) |
BPs Won% Total | 36% (69/192) | 43% (32/74) |
Return Pts W% | 38% (765/2033) | 36% (378/1044) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 47% (9/10) | 50% (7/7) |
Futures W/L | 67% (6/3) | 33% (1/2) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (14/27) | 41% (7/17) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (6/14) | 80% (4/5) |
Deciding Set W% | 63% (5/8) | 60% (3/5) |
1st set W, W | 93% (14/13) | 75% (8/6) |
1st set W, L | 7% (14/1) | 25% (8/2) |
1st set L, W | 14% (14/2) | 20% (10/2) |
Sebastian Fanselow Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Maxime Cressy
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
15
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
Jakub Nicod
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
8 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
SF |
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
57 of
100)
12
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Martyn Pawelski
65%
(
67 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
79 of
124)
11
Aces
15
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
59 of
79)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
32%
(
33 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
47 of
124)
117
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(4) 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Aleksandr Braynin
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
71%
(
85 of
119)
9
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
8
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
54 of
85)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
33 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
48 of
119)
116
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
David Poljak
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Adria Soriano Barrera
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
67%
(
70 of
105)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
96)
13
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
7
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
40%
(
42 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(0) 0-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Tomas Curras Abasolo
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Federico Iannaccone
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kyle Edmund
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
12
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gastao Elias
Player
Cem Ilkel
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H |
view more