P. L. Ruiz
To Win
S. Nagal
To Win
Sebastian Baez vs Sumit Nagal Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W W L L
Form
L W W L L W L W L LHead-to-head: Baez 1 - 0 Nagal
They have played 2 sets in total, with Baez winning 2 and Nagal winning 0. The last match between Baez and Nagal was at the Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva, 19-05-2024, First, Clay with Sebastian Baez getting the victory 7-6(7) 6-3.
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva(19-05-2024)
7
6
6
3
Upcoming Match
17 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Blockx VS Virtanen PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
17 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Kartal VS Townsend PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
17 Mar 2025 / Q3
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(7) 6-3 |
Stats 
Sebastian Baez
Player
Sumit Nagal
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
13
Games Won
9
2
Aces (Total)
0
1
Total Double Faults
0
1:39:45
Average Match Time
1:39:45
77% (55/71)
1st Serve %
73% (43/59)
73% (40/55)
1st Serve Win %
70% (30/43)
63% (10/16)
2nd Serve Win %
63% (10/16)
67% (2/3)
Break Points Won % (Total)
100% (1/1)
32% (19/59)
Return Points Win %
30% (21/71)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sebastian Baez vs Sumit Nagal Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sebastian Baez 1 - 0 Sumit Nagal
- Prediction Analysis: Second Serve Performance: In the recent 6-month period, Baez has exhibited a commendable form by winning 50.14% of points on their second serve, while Nagal has demonstrated slightly inferior performance with a 47.35% success rate. It is intriguing to note the significant correlation between this particular statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
- In-depth Evaluation: Return Game Stats: When analyzing the return game statistics of both players in their recent performances, we observe that Baez has been successful in seizing 50.1% of their opponents' second serve points, whereas Nagal has achieved a slightly lower rate of 50.09%. Furthermore, Baez has displayed notable prowess in first serve returns, recording a respectable 28.21% success rate, while Nagal has demonstrated a slightly higher rate of 30.36%. This intricate analysis holds a strong correlation to determine the favored player in this impending head-to-head encounter.
- Under Pressure Statistics: A comprehensive analysis of how players perform under pressure is crucial, particularly for in-game betting predictions. In this regard, Baez has demonstrated exceptional composure by saving 60.54% of breakpoints in their recent form. On the other hand, Nagal has exhibited a commendable ability to salvage challenging situations by saving 55.93% of breakpoints. This statistic serves as a valuable tool in predicting the outcome of the match.
- Performance Overview: Assessing the overall performance of both players over the past year, we find that Baez has achieved victory in a significant 50.91% of matches played, boasting a win-loss record of 28 wins and 27 losses. Conversely, Nagal has achieved a somewhat lower success rate of 42.86%, with a win-loss record of 24 wins and 32 losses. By examining these head-to-head records, we can develop a comprehensive prediction overview.
- Mastering Surfaces: Analyzing the players' best surface: It is noteworthy to acknowledge that Baez's most prolific performance occurs on the clay court, where they have triumphed in an impressive 70% of matches (216 wins and 91 losses). Contrarily, their least successful surface is the indoor hard court, with a meager 6% success rate (1 win and 17 losses). Nagal's highest career win percentage can be attributed to clay, with a commendable rate of 63% (228 wins and 136 losses). However, Nagal struggles on grass courts, having secured a mere 0% success rate (0 wins and 2 losses).
- Player Level: Analyzing the players' level of competition: Over the past year, Baez predominantly competed in the prestigious Main Tour, achieving victory in an impressive 59.26% of matches (16 wins and 11 losses). Conversely, Nagal primarily participated in the Main Tour, securing victory in 35% of matches (7 wins and 13 losses). Comparing these statistics is crucial in determining the favored player, considering the level of competition they have encountered.
- Direct H2H Matches: An Insightful Comparison: Previously, Baez and Nagal have clashed only once before. Baez emerged triumphant on that occasion, securing victory in straight sets. Their head-to-head encounters have consisted of 2 sets in total, with Baez emerging victorious in all of them. Assessing the most recent match between Baez and Nagal at the Gonet Geneva Open in Geneva on May 19, 2024, we recall a captivating encounter on clay in which Baez emerged triumphant with a scoreline of 7-6(7) 6-3.
- Head-to-Head Match Duration: Analyzing the average match duration in the previous head-to-head encounters between these players, we find it to be approximately 1 hour, 39 minutes, and 45 seconds.
- Predicting the Deciding Set: In their previous encounters, Baez and Nagal have not engaged in any decisive sets. Consequently, there is no historical record indicating a favored player in case this upcoming match reaches a deciding set.
- Head-to-Head Extreme Pressure Situations: Throughout their previous head-to-head matches, Baez and Nagal have engaged in one tiebreak scenario. In this instance, Baez successfully emerged victorious, while Nagal failed to secure a victory.
- Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the course of the last 12 months, Baez has regularly faced opponents with an average rank of 74.18. On the other hand, Nagal has confronted players with an average rank of 185.68. This insight contributes significantly to understanding the formidable level of competition faced by both players.
- Deciding Set Performance vs All Players: For those enthusiastic about live predictions and betting, it is vital to note that Baez has emerged victorious in 50% of the deciding sets they have encountered in the past 12 months. Similarly, Nagal has achieved a 60% success rate in all matches played on the tour that reached a deciding set. These statistics hold prominence in predicting the outcome of this match if it reaches such a pivotal stage.
- Current Event H2H Statistics: While past player performance undoubtedly yields valuable insights into predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to assess current event statistics to gauge the players' form. Therefore, referring to the section below to examine the current event stats will provide a more accurate indication of the players' current form and suitability to the particular event. Additionally, certain players demonstrate enhanced performance at specific events, which should be duly noted when making predictions regarding the match's outcome.
- Break Point Conversion: In recent form, Baez has capitalized on 37.17% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Nagal has exhibited a slightly higher conversion rate of 40.16% when presented with chances to break their opponents' serve. Remarkably, this statistical insight serves as a valuable resource for in-game live betting tips, especially when either player is faced with a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you possess a keen interest in models specifically designed to predict tennis matches, this article provides an excellent starting point. However, it bears mentioning that the article is intended for statistics enthusiasts.
Sebastian Baez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Sebastian Baez
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Sebastian Baez
56%
(
53 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
3
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
94
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Damir Dzumhur
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
32 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Francisco Comesana
70%
(
70 of
100)
1st Serve %
56%
(
68 of
121)
1
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
36 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
49 of
121)
113
Total Points Won
108
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Alexandre Muller
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Mariano Navone
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Sumit Nagal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Corentin Moutet
Player
Sumit Nagal
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Sumit Nagal
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
87)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
87)
76
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 7-6(5) 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
71%
(
87 of
123)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
7
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
68%
(
59 of
87)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
50 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
102)
115
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(4) 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hugo Dellien
Player
Sumit Nagal
81%
(
60 of
74)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Renzo Olivo
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
63
|
5-7 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Sumit Nagal
49%
(
40 of
82)
1st Serve %
68%
(
58 of
85)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
60%
(
25 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
26 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
100
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Sumit Nagal
70%
(
73 of
104)
1st Serve %
70%
(
78 of
111)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
48 of
78)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
38 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
52 of
111)
118
Total Points Won
97
|
6-7(8) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Adrian Mannarino
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Alexander Klintcharov
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
74%
(
56 of
76)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
1-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Sumit Nagal
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
15
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
87
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
63% (261/153)
Win/Loss
59% (335/229)
60% (600/405)
Sets Win/Loss
58% (765/552)
54% (5092/4403)
Games Win/Loss
53% (6468/5669)
48% (33/36)
Hard Win/Loss
57% (98/75)
71% (224/92)
Clay Win/Loss
63% (228/136)
6% (1/17)
Indoor Hard W/L
36% (9/16)
27% (3/8)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/2)
0.14
Aces Per Game
0.13
651
Aces Total
778
0.16
Double Faults Per Game
0.21
737
Total Double Faults
1219
1:43:11
Average Match Time
1:32:49
292.66
Average Opponent Rank
472.43
72% (20896/29190)
1st Serve %
68% (23470/34744)
64% (13316/20896)
1st Serve Win %
64% (15097/23470)
52% (4329/8293)
2nd Serve Win %
50% (5682/11260)
45% (1519/3368)
Break Points Won % (Total)
44% (1826/4136)
43% (12704/29689)
Return Points Win %
43% (15279/35679)
41% (11/16)
Slam W/L
33% (9/18)
38% (14/23)
Masters W/L
36% (5/9)
38% (3/5)
Cups W/L
50% (4/4)
62% (84/51)
Main Tour W/L
43% (24/32)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
77% (58/17)
Challenger W/L
58% (175/125)
69% (89/40)
Futures W/L
75% (117/39)
65% (249/385)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
60% (326/541)
42% (11/26)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
25% (4/16)
50% (61/123)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
57% (82/143)
57% (81/143)
Deciding Set Win %
49% (86/177)
87% (243/212)
1st Set Won, Won Match
84% (351/296)
12% (243/29)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
15% (351/53)
29% (171/49)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
18% (213/39)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
