R. A. Burruchaga
To Win
J. B. Torres
To Win
Sebastian Baez vs Roman Andres Burruchaga Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W L L L
Form
L W L L W L L W W LH2H: Baez 2 - 0 Burruchaga
They have played 4 sets in total, with Baez winning 4 and Burruchaga winning 0. The last match between Baez and Burruchaga was at the Rio Open - Rio de Janeiro, 18-02-2025, First, Clay with Sebastian Baez getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sebastian Baez | 2 |
| Roman Andres Burruchaga | 0 |
Rio Open - Rio de Janeiro(18-02-2025)
63% (12-7)
YTD Win/Loss
56% (15-12)
2
Head-to-Head
0
36
Ranking
137
18
Highest Rank
123
24
Age
23
R
Plays
-
18
Titles
4
63% (261-154)
Career Total W/L
58% (196-141)
$3,276,930
Career Prize Money
$165,905
1
YTD Titles
1
0
Hard H2H
0
2
Clay H2H
0
0
Indoor H2H
0
0
Grass H2H
0
Upcoming Match
25 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Minaur VS Fonseca PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
24 Mar 2025 / Third
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Gauff VS Linette PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
24 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Baez VS Burruchaga H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Sebastian Baez
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
17 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Baez VS Burruchaga H2H Stats
Stats
2
H2H Matches
0
4
Sets Won
0
25
Games Won
13
2
Aces (Total)
1
4
Total Double Faults
7
1:22:8
Average Match Time
1:22:8
70% (73/105)
1st Serve %
54% (63/117)
66% (48/73)
1st Serve Win %
56% (35/63)
59% (19/32)
2nd Serve Win %
44% (24/54)
67% (10/15)
Break Points Won % (Total)
50% (4/8)
50% (58/117)
Return Points Win %
36% (38/105)
100% (2/2)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/2)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (2/2)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (2/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (2/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sebastian Baez vs Roman Andres Burruchaga Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sebastian Baez 2 - 0 Roman Andres Burruchaga
- Recent performance in second serve: Over the past six months, Baez has displayed a remarkable proficiency in winning 50.14% of points on their second serve, whereas Burruchaga has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 49.35%. It is worth noting that there exists a significant correlation between this particular statistic and the accuracy of our match predictions.
- Analyzing return game statistics: Examining the return game statistics, Baez has demonstrated a commendable performance, securing victory in 50.1% of their opponent's second serve points in recent matches. On the other hand, Burruchaga has outperformed their adversary by triumphing in 51.63% of these crucial situations. Furthermore, when analyzing first serve returns, Baez maintains a success rate of 28.21%, while Burruchaga boasts a superior percentage of 35.75%. These essential details possess a strong association with determining the favored competitor in this eagerly anticipated head-to-head matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: In recent competitions, Baez has showcased their ability to navigate challenging situations by saving an impressive 60.54% of breakpoints. In contrast, Burruchaga has adeptly saved 53.33% of these pivotal moments. This particular statistic serves as a useful tool for making in-game betting predictions, considering the impact of pressure on players' performances.
- Performance overview: Over the course of the past year, Baez has emerged triumphant in 50.91% of their matches played, exemplified by a commendable win-to-loss ratio of 28/27. Meanwhile, Burruchaga has achieved a notable success rate of 61.25% in their respective matches, with a remarkable record of 49 wins and 31 losses. These statistics contribute to our overall head-to-head prediction overview.
- Surface expertise: Baez has exhibited their exceptional proficiency on Clay, where they boast a remarkable 70% career win rate (216 wins and 91 losses). However, their performance on Indoor Hard courts has been less stellar, garnering a mere 6% success rate (1 win and 17 losses). Conversely, Burruchaga's greatest achievements have occurred on Grass surfaces, where they have achieved an impressive 67% career win rate (2 wins and 1 loss). However, their performance on Hard courts presents a comparatively lower success rate of 57% (35 wins and 26 losses).
- Player level: Analyzing the past year, Baez has predominantly competed on the Main tour, emerging victorious in 59.26% of their matches (16 wins and 11 losses). In contrast, Burruchaga has predominantly participated in the Challengers/ITF tournaments, winning an impressive 62.3% of matches (38 wins and 23 losses) in this category. When predicting the favorite, it is essential to consider the players' statistics relative to the level of their chosen events.
- Direct head-to-head matches: Prior to this upcoming encounter, Baez and Burruchaga have crossed paths on one occasion. In this encounter, Baez emerged triumphant, securing victory once, while Burruchaga remains without a win. A total of two sets have been contested between these players, both of which were convincingly claimed by Baez. Their most recent clash transpired at the M15 Santiago tournament, on the 10th of February, 2019. It occurred on Clay, where Sebastian Baez achieved a resounding victory of 6-4, 6-1.
- Head-to-head match duration: Remarkably, the average duration of head-to-head matches between these players has amounted to 1 hour, 7 minutes, and 0 seconds.
- Predicting deciding set outcomes: Baez and Burruchaga have contested zero deciding sets thus far. However, it is worth noting that Baez remains undefeated in these situations, having emerged victorious in every deciding set they have played. While Burruchaga has not achieved the same level of success, they have also not been defeated in any deciding set contests. This statistic becomes particularly valuable when predicting the outcome of a potential extended match duration.
- Head-to-head extreme pressure situations: Neither Baez nor Burruchaga have engaged in any tiebreaks against each other in their previous encounters, resulting in an equal representation of zero triumphs for either player.
- Opponent quality statistics: Over the past 12 months, Baez has encountered opponents with an average ranking of 74.18, highlighting the caliber of competition they have faced. In contrast, Burruchaga has faced players with an average ranking of 216.21, indicating the relatively lower standard of their opponents.
- Deciding set performance versus all players: For those inclined towards live predictions and betting, it is crucial to consider the players' performances in deciding sets. Baez, in the past year, has emerged victorious in 50% of these pivotal moments, underlining their ability to thrive under pressure. Conversely, Burruchaga has achieved an even more impressive record of winning 62% of deciding sets in all matches played on the tour.
- Current event head-to-head statistics: While the analysis of past player performance provides valuable insights for predicting tennis matches, it is equally essential to explore the current event statistics to gauge a player's current form. Therefore, it is advisable to refer to the section below, labeled "eventStats," to assess the players' performances in the ongoing tournament. Furthermore, considering that certain players demonstrate elevated performances in specific events, this factor must be taken into account when making predictions.
- Breakpoint conversion: In their recent matches, Baez has proven themselves adept at capitalizing on breakpoint opportunities, successfully converting 37.17% of these chances. Burruchaga, on the other hand, has displayed an even more impressive ability, converting 46.6% of their opportunities to break their opponents' serve. This statistic assumes substantial significance when making in-game live betting tips, particularly when one of the competitors finds themselves with a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this published article serves as an excellent starting point. It provides valuable insights into predicting the outcomes of tennis tournaments through the combination of data and expert assessments. However, it is important to note that this article caters specifically to the statistical enthusiasts among us.
Sebastian Baez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Sebastian Baez
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
78%
(
40 of
51)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Sebastian Baez
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Sebastian Baez
56%
(
53 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
3
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
94
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Damir Dzumhur
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
32 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Francisco Comesana
70%
(
70 of
100)
1st Serve %
56%
(
68 of
121)
1
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
36 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
49 of
121)
113
Total Points Won
108
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Alexandre Muller
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Mariano Navone
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Roman Andres Burruchaga Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
46%
(
39 of
84)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
78%
(
40 of
51)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
55%
(
52 of
94)
1st Serve %
56%
(
52 of
93)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
8
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
60%
(
25 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
40 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Kilian Feldbausch
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
93)
0
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
5
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
45 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
99
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Baez
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hugo Dellien
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
78
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Federico Coria
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
61%
(
69 of
113)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
124)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
49 of
75)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
37%
(
42 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
50 of
124)
121
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(4) 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
63% (261/154)
Win/Loss
58% (196/141)
60% (600/407)
Sets Win/Loss
56% (447/358)
54% (5099/4415)
Games Win/Loss
52% (3953/3587)
47% (33/37)
Hard Win/Loss
57% (35/26)
71% (224/92)
Clay Win/Loss
58% (159/114)
6% (1/17)
Indoor Hard W/L
0% (0/0)
27% (3/8)
Grass Win/Loss
67% (2/1)
0.14
Aces Per Game
0.14
651
Aces Total
529
0.16
Double Faults Per Game
0.32
738
Total Double Faults
1186
1:43:7
Average Match Time
1:44:32
292.14
Average Opponent Rank
378.28
72% (20936/29241)
1st Serve %
62% (13800/22255)
64% (13341/20936)
1st Serve Win %
65% (8922/13800)
52% (4335/8304)
2nd Serve Win %
48% (4030/8455)
45% (1520/3371)
Break Points Won % (Total)
47% (1205/2549)
43% (12718/29743)
Return Points Win %
44% (9835/22454)
41% (11/16)
Slam W/L
55% (6/5)
37% (14/24)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
38% (3/5)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
62% (84/51)
Main Tour W/L
50% (10/10)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
77% (58/17)
Challenger W/L
58% (113/82)
69% (89/40)
Futures W/L
60% (67/44)
65% (249/386)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
58% (192/329)
42% (11/26)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
25% (1/4)
50% (61/123)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
51% (45/89)
57% (81/143)
Deciding Set Win %
57% (74/130)
87% (243/212)
1st Set Won, Won Match
85% (170/145)
12% (243/29)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
14% (170/24)
28% (172/49)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
30% (167/50)
See recent tennis photos of Baez and Burruchaga
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
