S. Jones
To Win
M. E. Sik
To Win
Scott Jones vs Christian Langmo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W W L L W
Form
W W L W W W L W W LHead-to-head: Jones 0 - 2 Langmo
They have played 4 sets in total, with Jones winning 0 and Langmo winning 4. The last match between Jones and Langmo was at the M25 Mildura, 11-03-2025, First, Grass with Christian Langmo getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-4.
M25 Mildura(11-03-2025)
7
6
6
4
Upcoming Match
- / Q3
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Lamens VS Uchijima PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Bonaventure VS Stefanini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
17 Mar 2025 / Q3
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-4 |
Stats 
Christian Langmo
Player
Scott Jones
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
12
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
28 of
34)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
16 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
16 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Scott Jones
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats
0
H2H Matches
2
0
Sets Won
4
16
Games Won
25
9
Aces (Total)
16
12
Total Double Faults
6
1:35:19
Average Match Time
1:35:19
57% (71/125)
1st Serve %
66% (76/116)
75% (53/71)
1st Serve Win %
79% (60/76)
46% (25/54)
2nd Serve Win %
60% (24/40)
100% (1/1)
Break Points Won % (Total)
56% (5/9)
28% (32/116)
Return Points Win %
38% (47/125)
0% (0/2)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (2/2)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (2/2)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (2/0)
0% (2/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Scott Jones vs Christian Langmo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Scott Jones 0 - 2 Christian Langmo
When assessing the performance of tennis players Jones and Langmo, various statistics provide insight into who might prevail in their upcoming match. One critical aspect is the second serve performance, where over the past six months, Jones has secured 43.66% of points from their second serve, while Langmo holds a slight edge with 47.24%. This particular metric is often strongly linked to accuracy in match predictions.
In terms of return game statistics in recent matches, Jones has won 42.7% of points on their opponent's second serve, whereas Langmo shows a marginal advantage with 44%. Examining the first serve return metrics, Jones outperforms Langmo, having won 31.58% of such points compared to Langmo’s 21.67%. These figures play a significant role in deciding which player might have the upper hand in head-to-head encounters.
Analyzing how each player handles pressure, Jones has saved 50% of breakpoints recently, although Langmo has demonstrated superior resilience, saving 63.69%. This particular stat is invaluable for making in-game betting predictions. Over the past 12 months, Jones has participated in tournaments with opponents averaging a ranking of 318.43, while Langmo’s opponents have had a mean rank of 391.38, indicating Jones's engagement with higher-ranked competitors.
Their head-to-head history tips the balance slightly in favor of Langmo, who has won their sole previous encounter, held on a hard surface at the M 25 Burnie tournament. Langmo claimed victory in straight sets, 6-4, 6-2. Notably, their matches have not gone into deciding sets, nor have they engaged in tiebreaks against each other, thereby suggesting a more straightforward contest.
Considering the players' preferred surfaces, Jones achieves her best outcomes on clay with a win rate of 75%, whereas Langmo excels on hard courts with a 60% victory rate. Moreover, a breakdown of performance at different competition levels reveals Jones has thrived at Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, winning 65% of her matches, while Langmo has spent more time competing at the Challenger/ITF level with a 54.17% win ratio.
Finally, both players have distinct strengths when it comes to break point conversion rates. Recently, Jones has been effective in converting 44.44% of break chances, contrasting Langmo’s 23.95% conversion rate. If this match extends into a deciding set, Langmo's superior deciding set win rate of 69% in the past year, compared to Jones's 57%, offers another hint as to which player might possess the upper hand.
Taking all these statistics into account, Langmo seems to be positioned as the anticipated winner. His superior head-to-head record, effectiveness under pressure, and consistency in deciding sets and on preferred surfaces mark him as the favored player for this contest.
Scott Jones Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Scott Jones
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
12
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
28 of
34)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
16 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
16 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Scott Jones
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
38 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Scott Jones
Player
Kody Pearson
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 4-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Scott Jones
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Scott Jones
Player
Tai Sach
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Scott Jones
Player
Makoto Ochi
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 4-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Scott Jones
63%
(
73 of
116)
1st Serve %
53%
(
73 of
137)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
52 of
73)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
42 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
50 of
137)
124
Total Points Won
129
|
5-7 7-6(6) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
view more
Christian Langmo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Christian Langmo
76%
(
60 of
79)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
29%
(
23 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Scott Jones
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
12
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
28 of
34)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
16 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
16 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Christian Langmo
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
7
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
18 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(10) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Pavle Marinkov
83%
(
55 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Naoki Tajima
65%
(
71 of
109)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
104)
16
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
5
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
33%
(
36 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Seongbin Sim
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
11
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
100%
(
8 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
80)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Christian Langmo
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Scott Jones
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Tsung-Hao Huang
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
59% (40/28)
Win/Loss
58% (244/176)
58% (92/66)
Sets Win/Loss
56% (546/422)
54% (802/680)
Games Win/Loss
52% (4891/4539)
60% (33/22)
Hard Win/Loss
60% (199/132)
75% (3/1)
Clay Win/Loss
51% (41/39)
0% (0/2)
Indoor Hard W/L
33% (2/4)
57% (4/3)
Grass Win/Loss
67% (2/1)
0.13
Aces Per Game
0.58
98
Aces Total
2664
0.16
Double Faults Per Game
0.25
115
Total Double Faults
1148
1:11:5
Average Match Time
1:32:3
366.82
Average Opponent Rank
459.2
57% (1687/2980)
1st Serve %
63% (15747/25131)
68% (1141/1687)
1st Serve Win %
74% (11621/15747)
50% (641/1292)
2nd Serve Win %
50% (4697/9384)
45% (122/272)
Break Points Won % (Total)
38% (844/2210)
40% (1157/2926)
Return Points Win %
37% (9395/25608)
0% (0/1)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
33% (3/6)
Challenger W/L
49% (64/66)
64% (37/21)
Futures W/L
62% (180/110)
60% (40/67)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
58% (241/412)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
100% (2/2)
53% (9/17)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
56% (79/141)
48% (11/23)
Deciding Set Win %
56% (74/133)
83% (42/35)
1st Set Won, Won Match
86% (232/199)
17% (42/7)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
14% (232/33)
19% (26/5)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
24% (187/45)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
