Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Scott Duncan vs Daniel Blazka Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Duncan vs Blazka analysis and find out who is favored!
Scott Duncan vs Daniel Blazka Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Duncan has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Blazka has won 18.75%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Duncan, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Blazka has won 26.09%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 25% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Duncan has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Blazka has saved 21.43% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Duncan has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Blazka winning 14.29% (W/L 3/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Duncan has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 57/ 42), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 6/ 10). Blazka has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 11% (W/L 3/ 24), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 9).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Duncan winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Duncan winning 2 and Blazka winning 0. The last match between Duncan and Blazka was at the M15 Ostrava, 21-11-2021, Q1 round, I.hard with Scott Duncan getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Duncan and Blazka have played a deciding set 0 times, with Duncan winning 0 times and Blazka 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Duncan winning 0, and Blazka 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Duncan has played against opponents with an average rank of while Blazka has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Duncan has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Blazka has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Duncan has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Blazka has converted 100% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Duncan 1 - 0 Blazka
N/A
Rank
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
52% (113-104)
Career Total W/L
8% (3-35)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Scott Duncan | Daniel Blazka |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Scott Duncan | Daniel Blazka |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/12) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 16% (14/72) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.05 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 2 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 56% (40/72) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (17/40) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 19% (6/32) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 25% (18/71) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (6/0) |
Scott Duncan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Eero Vasa
Player
Scott Duncan
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
17
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 5-7 10-6 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jean Baptiste Badon
Player
Scott Duncan
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
6
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
57%
(
17 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Samm Butler
Player
Scott Duncan
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
69)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 4-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Brady
Player
Scott Duncan
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Finn Bass
Player
Scott Duncan
70%
(
60 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
11
Aces
7
10
Double Faults
3
85%
(
51 of
60)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
26 of
88)
86
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Scott Duncan
Player
Josef Southcombe
45%
(
24 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
0
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Scott Duncan
Player
Ioannis Kountourakis
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Scott Duncan
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Scott Duncan
Player
Max Benaim
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Blazka Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anmar Faleh Alhogbani
Player
Daniel Blazka
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
51
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pablo Trochu
Player
Daniel Blazka
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
56%
(
18 of
32)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
51
Total Points Won
17
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Duncan Vs Blazka Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
