Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg vs Hamad Medjedovic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wayenburg vs Medjedovic analysis and find out who is favored!
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg vs Hamad Medjedovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wayenburg has won 47.81% of points on his second serve, while Medjedovic has won 47.68%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wayenburg, in recent form, has won 52.07% of his opponent's second serve points, while Medjedovic has won 48.24%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.36% and 27.3% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wayenburg has saved 63.19% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Medjedovic has saved 61.54% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wayenburg has won 53.57% of matches played (W/L 30/ 26), with Medjedovic winning 64.58% (W/L 31/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wayenburg has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 27/ 16), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 15/ 15). Medjedovic has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 71% (W/L 5/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 12/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Wayenburg has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.9% of matches (W/L 28/ 23), where as Medjedovic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 70% of matches (W/L 14/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wayenburg has played against opponents with an average rank of 118.27 while Medjedovic has played against players with an average rank of 219.15.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wayenburg has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Medjedovic has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wayenburg has converted 45.22% of breakpoint opportunities, and Medjedovic has converted 42% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Wayenburg 0 - 0 Medjedovic
533
Rank
351
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
133
Rank
102
High
20
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
59% (101-71)
Career Total W/L
62% (106-66)
57% (12-9)
YTD W/L
25% (1-3)
$34,000
Career Prize Money
$280,770
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Wayenburg VS Medjedovic H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg | Hamad Medjedovic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (12/9) | 25% (1/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (29/21) | 40% (4/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (256/240) | 46% (43/50) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (12/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.68 | 0.59 |
| Aces Total | 164 | 27 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0.37 |
| DFs Total | 81 | 17 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:36:32 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 71.1 | 74 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (866/1494) | 63% (182/287) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (636/866) | 70% (127/182) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (299/628) | 47% (49/105) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (64/136) | 44% (11/25) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (593/1499) | 38% (108/283) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 57% (12/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (11/20) | 25% (1/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 70% (7/10) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 77% (13/10) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 0% (1/0) |
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Tomas Curras Abasolo
Player
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
82%
(
73 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(3) 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gauthier Onclin
Player
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
46%
(
39 of
84)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Antoine Ghibaudo
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
76%
(
37 of
49)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Alex Knaff
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 3-6 6-0 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
Player
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
71%
(
70 of
98)
1st Serve %
58%
(
58 of
100)
0
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
42)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Theo Papamalamis
Player
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
70%
(
71 of
102)
1st Serve %
62%
(
77 of
124)
3
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
53 of
77)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
15 of
47)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
56 of
124)
116
Total Points Won
110
|
7-5 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
12
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Emilien Demanet
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
76%
(
32 of
42)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Antoine Ghibaudo
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
11
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Hamad Medjedovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Benoit Paire
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
44%
(
39 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
9
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
5
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
57%
(
28 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
32%
(
28 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Grenier
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
10
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
55%
(
58 of
105)
1st Serve %
65%
(
71 of
109)
13
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
7
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
50 of
71)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
40 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
109)
106
Total Points Won
108
|
6-7(2) 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Marco Cecchinato
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Arthur Fils
76%
(
70 of
92)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
87)
19
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
62 of
70)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
46 of
57)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
22%
(
20 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
87)
101
Total Points Won
78
|
3-4(6) 4-1 4-2 3-4(9) 4-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Dominic Stricker
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve %
55%
(
18 of
33)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
0
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
15 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
3 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
32
Total Points Won
26
|
4-3(5) 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Robin |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Abedallah Shelbayh
79%
(
56 of
71)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
18
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
49 of
56)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
20%
(
14 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
64
|
3-4(6) 4-2 4-3(5) 4-2 | H2H | ||
| Robin |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Luca Van Assche
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
13
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
4-2 2-4 4-3(7) 4-1 | H2H | ||
| Robin |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Alex Michelsen
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
78%
(
87 of
112)
14
Aces
13
7
Double Faults
4
89%
(
54 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
57 of
87)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
27 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
112)
113
Total Points Won
96
|
4-2 4-3(3) 3-4(3) 3-4(5) 4-3(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
56%
(
75 of
134)
1st Serve %
64%
(
73 of
114)
10
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
4
76%
(
57 of
75)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
58 of
73)
51%
(
30 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
35%
(
47 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
37 of
114)
124
Total Points Won
124
|
4-6 7-6(2) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
view more
Wayenburg Vs Medjedovic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
