Sarah Van Emst vs Matylda Burylo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
W L W W L W W L L W
Form
W L L W L L W L W LHead-2-Head: Emst 1 - 0 Burylo
They have played 2 sets in total, with Emst winning 2 and Burylo winning 0. The last match between Emst and Burylo was at the W35 Bastad, 12-05-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Sarah Van Emst getting the victory 6-0 6-2.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Sarah Van Emst | 1 |
Matylda Burylo | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W35 Bastad(12-05-2025)
Emst | Stats | Burylo |
---|---|---|
67% (16-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (11-11) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
671 | Ranking | N/A |
664 | Highest Rank | N/A |
20 | Age | 21 |
- | Plays | - |
1 | Titles | 0 |
60% (59-39) | Career Total W/L | 51% (27-26) |
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fruhvirtova VS Boskovic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
24 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
Diallo VS Djere PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
24 Jun 2025 / Second
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-0 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Sarah Van Emst
Player
Matylda Burylo
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 2 |
3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
1:5:25 | Average Match Time | 1:5:25 |
64% (28/44) | 1st Serve % | 56% (24/43) |
79% (22/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 38% (9/24) |
50% (8/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (7/19) |
45% (5/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
63% (27/43) | Return Points Win % | 32% (14/44) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Emst vs Burylo Match Preview :
- How do second serve performance compare between Emst and Burylo in recent form? Emst slightly leads with a 42% win rate, just ahead of Burylo's 41.62%.
- In the return game analysis, Emst is more successful, winning 52.3% of opponents' second serve points compared to Burylo's 50%.
- Conversely, Burylo edges out Emst on first serve returns, capturing 35.31% of points versus Emst's 33.94%.
- When it comes to playing under pressure, Emst shows greater breakpoint resilience at 49.48% saved, while Burylo saves 44.78%.
- Over the last year, Emst has been more successful, winning 61.36% of their matches, compared to Burylo's 51.61%.
- Both players have their best career surface win percentage on Hard courts. However, Emst excels with a 71% win rate, bettering Burylo's 56%.
- Both players primarily compete in $10K ITF tournaments, with Emst achieving a higher win rate of 62.86% compared to Burylo's 57.14%.
- Emst has generally faced lower-ranked opponents, with an average rank of 431.48 compared to Burylo's more challenging average opponent rank of 232.39 over the last year.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Burylo has been notably stronger, winning 63% compared to Emst's 36% in the past year.
- Both players are almost equally competent in converting breakpoint opportunities, with Emst at 47.93% and Burylo at a slightly higher 48%.
Editorial Prediction (May 12, 2025, UTC):
The statistical comparison between Emst and Burylo suggests a tightly contested match. Emst displays marginally better performance in second serve points and under pressure situations, highlighting their ability to maintain composure.
While Emst shows superior overall matchup success and better numbers on their preferred hard surface, Burylo's strength in deciding sets and first serve returns suggests they can turn the tables if the match is extended.
Burylo's exposure to higher-ranked opponents could serve them well in this contest, offering insights into more competitive play. Despite this, Emst's generally consistent metrics across their gameplay and slightly superior current form make them the likelier winner of the upcoming match.
Emst vs Burylo Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Sarah Van Emst Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Sarah Van Emst
Player
Angelina Wirges
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
20 of
34)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Ella Seidel
Player
Sarah Van Emst
60%
(
67 of
112)
1st Serve %
54%
(
62 of
115)
9
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
40%
(
45 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
54 of
115)
121
Total Points Won
106
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Alexis Blokhina
Player
Sarah Van Emst
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
51%
(
20 of
39)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Sarah Van Emst
Player
Maria Paulina Perez Garcia
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Sarah Van Emst
Player
Matylda Burylo
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Loes Ebeling Koning
Player
Sarah Van Emst
58%
(
60 of
104)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
105)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
47%
(
49 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
56 of
105)
111
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Sarah Van Emst
Player
Nellie Taraba Wallberg
51%
(
36 of
71)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
46%
(
33 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Sarah Van Emst
Player
Yoana Konstantinova
60%
(
3 of
5)
1st Serve %
50%
(
5 of
10)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
3 of
3)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
8 of
10)
12
Total Points Won
3
|
4-0 ret. | H2H |
view more
Matylda Burylo Recent Matches Played
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Angelina Wirges
Player
Matylda Burylo
39%
(
19 of
49)
1st Serve %
73%
(
36 of
49)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
47%
(
23 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Matylda Burylo
Player
Julia Orswall
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
47%
(
21 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Sarah Van Emst
Player
Matylda Burylo
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Barbara Straszewska
Player
Matylda Burylo
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
48 of
80)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
47%
(
43 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Matylda Burylo
Player
Wilva Chan
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
52
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
60% (59/39) | Win/Loss | 51% (27/26) |
58% (130/95) | Sets Win/Loss | 49% (59/62) |
55% (1139/946) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (552/568) |
71% (29/12) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (10/8) |
54% (30/26) | Clay Win/Loss | 38% (5/8) |
0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (12/10) |
0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
118 | Aces Total | 10 |
0.4 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
409 | Total Double Faults | 75 |
1:35:5 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
427.78 | Average Opponent Rank | 263.6 |
56% (3310/5956) | 1st Serve % | 66% (886/1347) |
63% (2083/3310) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (476/886) |
45% (1194/2646) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (200/461) |
49% (396/802) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (77/151) |
48% (2849/5931) | Return Points Win % | 44% (602/1383) |
0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
53% (10/9) | Challenger W/L | 40% (6/9) |
63% (49/29) | Futures W/L | 55% (21/17) |
59% (56/95) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (27/53) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
47% (9/19) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 29% (2/7) |
53% (16/30) | Deciding Set Win % | 67% (10/15) |
91% (53/48) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (21/18) |
9% (53/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (21/3) |
22% (45/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (32/9) |
Emst vs. Burylo Prediction Form Trend:

Other Predictions
- Loading news...