Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sarah Van Emst vs Madelief Hageman Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Emst vs Hageman analysis and find out who is favored!
Sarah Van Emst vs Madelief Hageman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Emst 1 - 0 Hageman
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Emst has won 45.23% of points on their second serve, while Hageman has won 46.22%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Emst, in recent form, has won 58.95% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hageman has won 56.2%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.82% and 41.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Emst has saved 54.8% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hageman has saved 54.21% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Emst has won 64.29% of matches played (W/L 36/ 20), with Hageman winning 47.54% (W/L 29/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Emst has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 73% (W/L 19/ 7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 22/ 22). Hageman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 97/ 95), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Emst has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 30/ 15), where as Hageman has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 24/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Emst winning 1 times and Hageman being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Emst winning 2 and Hageman winning 0. The last match between Emst and Hageman was at the W15 Kursumlijska Banja, 31-07-2024, First, Clay with Sarah Van Emst getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:36:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Emst and Hageman have played a deciding set 0 times, with Emst winning 0 times and Hageman 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Emst winning 0, and Hageman 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Emst has played against opponents with an average rank of 358.89 while Hageman has played against players with an average rank of 357.1.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Emst has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hageman has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Emst has converted 49.47% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hageman has converted 49.58% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
721
Rank
721
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
900
Rank
900
High
21
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
59% (41-29)
Career Total W/L
50% (101-101)
63% (27-16)
YTD W/L
52% (26-24)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Sarah Van Emst vs Madelief Hageman For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Emst VS Hageman
| stats | Sarah Van Emst | Madelief Hageman |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:0 | 1:36:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (23/45) | 65% (47/72) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (15/23) | 45% (21/47) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 68% (15/22) | 52% (13/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (5/11) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (38/72) | 33% (15/45) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Sarah Van Emst
Player
Madelief Hageman
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sarah Van Emst | Madelief Hageman |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (27/16) | 52% (26/24) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (58/42) | 53% (62/56) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (517/409) | 52% (577/526) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 77% (10/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (17/13) | 52% (25/23) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.11 | 0.07 |
| Aces Total | 52 | 37 |
| DFs per game | 0.44 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 200 | 100 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:16 | 1:24:44 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 324.63 | 327.66 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (1565/2839) | 64% (1668/2616) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (999/1565) | 57% (951/1668) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (588/1274) | 47% (441/948) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (188/388) | 48% (157/327) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (1367/2846) | 47% (1185/2543) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 56% (5/4) | 36% (4/7) |
| Futures W/L | 65% (22/12) | 56% (22/17) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (25/41) | 52% (26/50) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 29% (2/7) | 22% (2/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 64% (9/14) | 44% (8/18) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (21/19) | 79% (28/22) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (21/2) | 21% (28/6) |
| 1st set L, W | 32% (22/7) | 18% (22/4) |
Sarah Van Emst Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Marie Vogt
Player
Sarah Van Emst
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sarah Van Emst
Player
Milana Zhabrailova
54%
(
43 of
80)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
49%
(
39 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sarah Van Emst
Player
Eva Marie Voracek
54%
(
49 of
91)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sarah Van Emst
Player
Julia Victoria Rennert
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
22 of
34)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ipek Oz
Player
Sarah Van Emst
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Barbora Palicova
Player
Sarah Van Emst
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
115)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
9
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
47 of
115)
100
Total Points Won
103
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sarah Van Emst
Player
Gina Kondos
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sarah Van Emst
Player
Arina Bulatova
50%
(
54 of
109)
1st Serve %
51%
(
63 of
124)
1
Aces
4
11
Double Faults
27
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
40%
(
22 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
15 of
61)
39%
(
9 of
23)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
54 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
66 of
124)
121
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(7) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sarah Van Emst
Player
Mirjana Jovanovic
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
52
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arina Bulatova
Player
Sarah Van Emst
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
6
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
34 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Madelief Hageman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Karolina Kozakova
Player
Madelief Hageman
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mina Hodzic
Player
Madelief Hageman
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Xenia Bandurowska
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cristina Diaz Adrover
Player
Madelief Hageman
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
86)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
82
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Florence Fohnen
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Madelief Hageman
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve %
80%
(
51 of
64)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Monika Wojcik
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
13 of
21)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
49%
(
22 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sarah Van Emst
Player
Madelief Hageman
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eleejah Inisan
Player
Madelief Hageman
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
51%
(
33 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Free Tennis Predictions For Today's Matches
A few tennis predictions for upcoming lower level events head to head tennis matches are below. If you want to get access to the best matches that will win you the most, subscribe to our tennis predictions plan for a low monthly fee and get full access to all our expert picks with full odds analysis and value bets.
Emst Vs Hageman Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Emst are available here and Hageman photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
