Prediction of Sarah Palfrey Cooke vs Margot Lumb Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
S. Palfrey Cooke vs M. Lumb

Sarah Palfrey Cooke

USA

2

Win

Played

0

Win

113

Age

113

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Margot Lumb

GBR

2

Win

Played

0

Win

113

Age

113

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Cooke 2 - 0 Lumb

They have played 7 sets in total, with Sarah Palfrey Cooke winning 6 and Margot Lumb winning 1. The last match between Sarah Palfrey Cooke and Margot Lumb was at the Los Angeles Pac Southwest, 23-09-1938, Round: SF, Surface: Hard, with Sarah Palfrey Cooke getting the victory 6-2 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Cooke	2
Lumb	0

Last 3 H2H Matches:

(SF) Los Angeles Pac Southwest(09-23-38)

Stats

Sarah Palfrey Cooke

Margot Lumb

(Robin) Wightman Cup(06-10-38)

Stats

Sarah Palfrey Cooke

Margot Lumb

(Robin) Wightman Cup(08-20-37)

Stats

Sarah Palfrey Cooke

Margot Lumb

S. P. Cooke vs M. Lumb H2H Profile

S. P. Cooke	Stats	M. Lumb
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
78.57% (429-117)	Career Total W/L	64.29% (108-60)
1	Grass	0
1	Hard	0
2	Titles	0
2	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

S. P. Cooke vs M. Lumb Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sarah Palfrey Cooke has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Margot Lumb has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sarah Palfrey Cooke, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Margot Lumb has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Sarah Palfrey Cooke has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Margot Lumb has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Sarah Palfrey Cooke has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Margot Lumb winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Sarah Palfrey Cooke has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 86% (W/L 67/11), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 70% (W/L 31/13). Margot Lumb has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 86% (W/L 11/4), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 50% (W/L 5/5).
Player level: In the last year, Sarah Palfrey Cooke has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Margot Lumb has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Sarah Palfrey Cooke winning 3 times and Margot Lumb being victorious 0 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Sarah Palfrey Cooke winning 6 and Margot Lumb winning 1.
The last match between Sarah Palfrey Cooke and Margot Lumb was at the Los Angeles Pac Southwest, 23-09-1938, Round: SF, Surface: Hard, with Sarah Palfrey Cooke getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sarah Palfrey Cooke has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Margot Lumb has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sarah Palfrey Cooke has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Margot Lumb has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Sarah Palfrey Cooke has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Margot Lumb has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Sarah Palfrey Cooke vs Margot Lumb Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

S. P. Cooke vs M. Lumb H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

S. P. Cooke	Stats	M. Lumb
3	H2H Matches Won	0
6	Sets Won	1
41	Games Won	21
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (3/3)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/3)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

S. P. Cooke Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Munich Pro - 12-08-1947
Robin Pauline BetzP. Betz	L	9-Sep	Stats
Wembley Pro - 21-07-1947
Robin Pauline BetzP. Betz	W	6-1 3-6 6-3	Stats
Robin Pauline BetzP. Betz	L	UNK	Stats
US National Championships - 28-08-1945
R4 Jean DoyleJ. Doyle	W	6-1 6-3	Stats
Dodo CheneyD. Cheney	W	6-3 6-4	Stats

View All

M. Lumb Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Queens Club - 18-06-1956
R3 Jean ForbesJ. Forbes	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
Harpenden - 04-07-1955
E FrancisE. Francis	W	7-5 6-3	Stats
SF Renee SchuurmanR. Schuurman	L	6-0 6-1	Stats
New Malden - 24-08-1953
Gem GilbertG. Gilbert	W	6-3 6-1	Stats
SF Angela BuxtonA. Buxton	L	3-6 6-4 6-2	Stats

View All

S. P. Cooke vs M. Lumb Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

S. P. Cooke	Stats	M. Lumb
78.57% (429/117)	YTD Win/Loss	64.29% (108/60)
74.91% (872/292)	Sets Win/Loss	62.95% (226/133)
100.00% (6423/0)	Games Win/Loss	55.54% (1834/1468)
78.00% (39/11)	Hard Win/Loss	73.33% (11/4)
85.90% (67/11)	Clay Win/Loss	68.52% (37/17)
76.19% (16/5)	Indoor Hard W/L	50.00% (1/1)
78.19% (276/77)	Grass Win/Loss	62.07% (54/33)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
72.84% (59/22)	Slam W/L	61.54% (16/10)
70.00% (7/3)	Cups W/L	0.00% (0/2)
79% (411/521)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	64% (105/163)
59% (69/117)	Deciding Set Win %	52% (17/33)
94% (397/374)	1st Set Won, Won Match	92% (107/98)
6% (397/23)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	8% (107/9)
30% (128/38)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	13% (56/7)