Sara Sorribes Tormo vs Nao Hibino Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W L W L L W
Form
W L W W L L W L W LHead-To-Head: Tormo 1 - 1 Hibino
They have played 4 sets in total, with Tormo winning 2 and Hibino winning 2. The last match between Tormo and Hibino was at the BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells, 02-03-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Hard, with Sara Sorribes Tormo getting the victory 7-5 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | 1 |
| Nao Hibino | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells(02-03-2025)
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Nao Hibino
7
5
6
1
| Tormo | Stats | Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| 58% (11-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 48% (13-14) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 109 | Ranking | 206 |
| 32 | Highest Rank | 56 |
| 28 | Age | 30 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 12 | Titles | 12 |
| 60% (427-290) | Career Total W/L | 55% (394-328) |
| $2,437,306 | Career Prize Money | $1,497,842 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Alcaraz VS Musetti PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
16 May 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sinner VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
16 May 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-1 |
Stats 
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Nao Hibino
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Sara Sorribes Tormo
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 19 | Games Won | 18 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:43:22 | Average Match Time | 1:43:22 |
| 66% (86/130) | 1st Serve % | 69% (79/115) |
| 64% (55/86) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (46/79) |
| 23% (10/44) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (11/36) |
| 60% (9/15) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (9/18) |
| 50% (58/115) | Return Points Win % | 50% (65/130) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tormo vs Hibino Match Preview :
Over the past six months, Hibino's second serve has triumphed in 39.31% of the points, while Tormo has managed a slightly lower figure of 38.09%. This metric is notably effective when predicting match outcomes. Furthermore, in the domain of receiving games, Hibino demonstrates strength with 50.79% of winnings on the opponent's second serve points, contrasting with Tormo's 50.53%. In terms of premier serve returns, Hibino shows a rate of 32.92%, while Tormo outshines with 39.31%. Such statistics play a significant role in assessing player favorability in this specific head-to-head matchup.
Pressure scenarios reveal that Hibino has preserved 49.62% of breakpoints faced in recent times, surpassing Tormo's 44.1% saving rate. This figure often provides critical insights for live betting strategies. A general performance analysis over the past year illustrates Hibino's win rate at 45.61% (W/L 26/31), in contrast to Tormo's 51.85% success (W/L 28/26), offering a broader lens into likely match results. Regarding surface preferences, Hibino excels on Hard courts with a career winning rate of 57% (W/L 283/215), but her performance declines to 45% on Clay (W/L 45/55). Conversely, Clay is Tormo's strength with a laudable 66% win rate (W/L 249/130), but her performance on Indoor hard surfaces reaches an equilibrium at 50% (W/L 20/20).
In terms of player experience at various levels, Hibino's recent Main tour encounters resulted in a 42.86% win rate (W/L 9/12), whereas Tormo exhibited a 55.56% success rate in her Main tour games (W/L 15/12). When assessing direct encounters, Hibino has a convincing win record against Tormo, having triumphed in their sole meeting, taking both sets during their first encounter. This match transpired during the Fed Cup, World Group II, where Hibino secured the victory with a 6-4, 6-2 result.
Head-to-head analysis shows an average match duration of 1 hour, 37 minutes, with no precedent for either player winning or losing a decider set between them. Similar results are noted for tiebreak scenarios, as they have yet to engage in one. However, if the current match extends to a decisive set, Hibino's historical 54% win rate in such situations surpasses Tormo's 50%. When considering the caliber of opponents faced, Hibino has played against players averaging a rank of 172.49, whereas Tormo's opponents hold an average rank of 165.7.
Break-point conversion rates add another layer of forecasting, with Tormo converting 42.79% of opportunities in recent times compared to Hibino's 38.65%. Considering all these statistics and analytical insights, Hibino appears slightly favored to win, driven by her advantage in head-to-head history, superior breakpoint preservation, and overall performance trends on her preferred surfaces.
Tormo vs Hibino Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Sara Sorribes Tormo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Laura Pigossi
72%
(
57 of
79)
1st Serve %
93%
(
40 of
43)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
49%
(
39 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Selena Janicijevic
Player
Sara Sorribes Tormo
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
29 of
39)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Heather Watson
Player
Sara Sorribes Tormo
59%
(
59 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
49%
(
49 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Oksana Kalashnikova
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Claire Liu
Player
Sara Sorribes Tormo
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Lilli Tagger
73%
(
66 of
90)
1st Serve %
72%
(
65 of
90)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
81
|
6-7(1) 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Claire Liu
Player
Sara Sorribes Tormo
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Nao Hibino
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Nao Hibino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Nao Hibino
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Taylah Preston
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
43%
(
32 of
74)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
47%
(
30 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Darja Semenistaja
Player
Nao Hibino
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
104)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
104)
100
Total Points Won
94
|
6-2 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mona Barthel
Player
Nao Hibino
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anhelina Kalinina
Player
Nao Hibino
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Yasmine Mansouri
78%
(
81 of
104)
1st Serve %
61%
(
73 of
120)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
9
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
49 of
73)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
38%
(
40 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
120)
116
Total Points Won
108
|
5-7 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (427/290) | Win/Loss | 55% (394/328) |
| 58% (943/689) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (876/778) |
| 53% (7788/6895) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (7789/7316) |
| 54% (135/116) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (283/216) |
| 66% (249/131) | Clay Win/Loss | 45% (51/62) |
| 49% (21/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (26/19) |
| 51% (22/21) | Grass Win/Loss | 52% (34/31) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 239 | Aces Total | 989 |
| 0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 2701 | Total Double Faults | 1527 |
| 1:22:12 | Average Match Time | 1:11:53 |
| 411.82 | Average Opponent Rank | 462.12 |
| 67% (24509/36658) | 1st Serve % | 65% (24587/37693) |
| 58% (14100/24509) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (14906/24587) |
| 41% (4953/12143) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (6085/13103) |
| 51% (2616/5138) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (2186/4618) |
| 49% (17878/36590) | Return Points Win % | 45% (16996/38023) |
| 43% (26/35) | Slam W/L | 47% (35/40) |
| 49% (40/42) | Masters W/L | 44% (28/36) |
| 57% (8/6) | Cups W/L | 56% (9/7) |
| 55% (137/114) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (103/104) |
| 68% (167/79) | Challenger W/L | 59% (195/136) |
| 78% (49/14) | Futures W/L | 83% (24/5) |
| 60% (420/700) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (387/710) |
| 33% (3/9) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 55% (72/131) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (84/148) |
| 57% (112/197) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (122/214) |
| 91% (404/367) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (371/321) |
| 9% (404/36) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (371/48) |
| 19% (313/60) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (351/70) |
Tormo vs. Hibino Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
