Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sara Ottomano vs Nina Alibalic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ottomano vs Alibalic analysis and find out who is favored!
Sara Ottomano vs Nina Alibalic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ottomano has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Alibalic has won 45.79%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ottomano, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Alibalic has won 64.6%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 48.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ottomano has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Alibalic has saved 55.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ottomano has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Alibalic winning 67.5% (W/L 27/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ottomano has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 41/ 32), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 26/ 39). Alibalic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 135/ 65), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ottomano winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ottomano winning 2 and Alibalic winning 0. The last match between Ottomano and Alibalic was at the Grenoble, 01-02-2016, Q1 round, I.hard with Sara Ottomano getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ottomano and Alibalic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ottomano winning 0 times and Alibalic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ottomano winning 0, and Alibalic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ottomano has played against opponents with an average rank of while Alibalic has played against players with an average rank of 35.52.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ottomano has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Alibalic has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ottomano has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Alibalic has converted 63.64% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ottomano 1 - 0 Alibalic
Ret.
Rank
586
High
28
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
865
Rank
475
High
25
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
49% (81-83)
Career Total W/L
67% (157-79)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
77% (10-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sara Ottomano | Nina Alibalic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sara Ottomano | Nina Alibalic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 77% (10/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 71% (22/9) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (160/108) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 77% (10/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.02 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 3 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.32 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 42 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:20:9 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 65.38 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (405/645) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 56% (228/405) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (111/240) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 66% (57/87) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 55% (334/610) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 77% (10/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 77% (10/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (7/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (7/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/3) |
Sara Ottomano Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Diana Martynov
Player
Sara Ottomano
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Ottomano
Player
Shahar Biran
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
42%
(
19 of
45)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikoleta Antoniou Karademitrou
Player
Sara Ottomano
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
81%
(
39 of
48)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
47%
(
28 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nina Stadler
Player
Sara Ottomano
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Leonie Kung
Player
Sara Ottomano
73%
(
76 of
104)
1st Serve %
80%
(
70 of
88)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
70)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
43 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
5-7 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Ottomano
Player
Helene Scholsen
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
6
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Sara Ottomano
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Ottomano
Player
Chloe Cirotte
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
53%
(
19 of
36)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Nina Alibalic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Jizel Matos Sequeira Fernandes
Player
Nina Alibalic
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nina Alibalic
Player
Anna Turati
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
81%
(
57 of
70)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
50%
(
35 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
42 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nina Alibalic
Player
Karolina Vlckova
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve %
68%
(
61 of
90)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
9
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nina Alibalic
Player
Ireni Lucia
48%
(
16 of
33)
1st Serve %
67%
(
24 of
36)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
14 of
16)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
12)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
21%
(
7 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
53
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Nina Alibalic
Player
Michele Adamczewska
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Turati
Player
Nina Alibalic
80%
(
64 of
80)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
7
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
6-0 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nina Alibalic
Player
Anika Jaskova
55%
(
42 of
76)
1st Serve %
80%
(
59 of
74)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
8
50%
(
21 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
51%
(
39 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
45 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nina Alibalic
Player
Martina Marusinova
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-2 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Nina Alibalic
Player
Elena Karner
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Ottomano Vs Alibalic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
