Prediction of Sara Gomer vs Emiko Okagawa Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
S. Gomer vs E. Okagawa

Sara Gomer

GBR

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Emiko Okagawa

JPN

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Gomer 1 - 1 Okagawa

They have played 4 sets in total, with Sara Gomer winning 2 and Emiko Okagawa winning 2. The last match between Sara Gomer and Emiko Okagawa was at the San Diego, 03-08-1987, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Sara Gomer getting the victory 6-1 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Gomer	1
Okagawa	1

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R3) San Diego(08-03-87)

Stats

Sara Gomer

Emiko Okagawa

(R3) Singapore(04-27-87)

Stats

Emiko Okagawa

Sara Gomer

S. Gomer vs E. Okagawa H2H Profile

S. Gomer	Stats	E. Okagawa
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
49.03% (177-184)	Career Total W/L	41.61% (62-87)
1	Hard	1
2	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

S. Gomer vs E. Okagawa Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sara Gomer has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Emiko Okagawa has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sara Gomer, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Emiko Okagawa has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Sara Gomer has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Emiko Okagawa has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Sara Gomer has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Emiko Okagawa winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Sara Gomer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 63/59), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 44% (W/L 37/48). Emiko Okagawa has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 14/18), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 38% (W/L 19/31).
Player level: In the last year, Sara Gomer has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Emiko Okagawa has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Sara Gomer winning 1 times and Emiko Okagawa being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Sara Gomer winning 2 and Emiko Okagawa winning 2.
The last match between Sara Gomer and Emiko Okagawa was at the San Diego, 03-08-1987, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Sara Gomer getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sara Gomer has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Emiko Okagawa has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sara Gomer has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Emiko Okagawa has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Sara Gomer has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Emiko Okagawa has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Sara Gomer vs Emiko Okagawa Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

S. Gomer vs E. Okagawa H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

S. Gomer	Stats	E. Okagawa
1	H2H Matches Won	1
2	Sets Won	2
24	Games Won	17
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

S. Gomer Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Brighton - 20-10-1992
Q1 Julie PullinJ. Pullin	L	3-6 6-4 6-3	Stats
US Open - 31-08-1992
R1 Louise AllenL. Allen	L	6-4 7-6(3)	Stats
Barcelona Olympics - 28-07-1992
R2 Samantha SmithS. Smith	L	2-6 6-3 6-1	Stats
Fed Cup WG PO: FIN vs GBR - 17-07-1992
Robin Nanne DahlmanN. Dahlman	L	6-4 6-0	Stats
Fed Cup WG PO: CHI vs GBR - 15-07-1992
Robin Barbara CastroB. Castro	W	6-2 6-0	Stats

View All

E. Okagawa Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Taipei - 25-09-1992
R3 Maya KidowakiM. Kidowaki	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 13-01-1992
Q1 Nanne DahlmanN. Dahlman	L	6-2 2-6 6-0	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 24-06-1991
Q1 Catherine SuireC. Suire	L	7-5 6-0	Stats
Pattaya - 15-04-1991
R3 Misumi MiyauchiM. Miyauchi	L	4-6 6-1 6-3	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 14-01-1991
Q2 Stacey SchefflinS. Schefflin	L	5-7 6-4 9-7	Stats

View All

S. Gomer vs E. Okagawa Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

S. Gomer	Stats	E. Okagawa
49.03% (177/184)	YTD Win/Loss	41.61% (62/87)
49.10% (410/425)	Sets Win/Loss	44.08% (149/189)
49.91% (3855/3869)	Games Win/Loss	49.00% (1546/1609)
51.64% (63/59)	Hard Win/Loss	38.00% (19/31)
51.22% (21/20)	Clay Win/Loss	43.75% (14/18)
51.22% (21/20)	Indoor Hard W/L	56.25% (9/7)
48.61% (35/37)	Grass Win/Loss	38.46% (5/8)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
315.52	Average Opponent Rank	367.99
44.44% (4/5)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
40.00% (6/9)	Cups W/L	50.00% (1/1)
65.85% (27/14)	Challenger W/L	50.00% (8/8)
36.84% (21/36)	Futures W/L	38.89% (14/22)
49% (176/359)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	41% (61/148)
31% (5/16)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	44% (4/9)
50% (58/115)	Deciding Set Win %	37% (15/41)
81% (177/144)	1st Set Won, Won Match	82% (66/54)
18% (177/32)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	18% (66/12)
18% (184/33)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	10% (83/8)