Sara Bejlek vs Ena Shibahara Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W W W W W
Form
W L L W L W L L W LHead-To-Head: Bejlek 1 - 0 Shibahara
They have played 3 sets in total, with Bejlek winning 2 and Shibahara winning 1. The last match between Bejlek and Shibahara was at the French Open - Paris, 21-05-2025, Round: Q2 round, Surface: Clay, with Sara Bejlek getting the victory 7-5 2-6 7-6(10).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sara Bejlek | 1 |
| Ena Shibahara | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: French Open - Paris(21-05-2025)
Sara Bejlek
Ena Shibahara
7
5
2
6
7
6
| Bejlek | Stats | Shibahara |
|---|---|---|
| 68% (23-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 53% (19-17) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 117 | Ranking | 123 |
| 114 | Highest Rank | 119 |
| 19 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 9 | Titles | 1 |
| 68% (142-68) | Career Total W/L | 59% (156-110) |
| $741,721 | Career Prize Money | $250,548 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Alcaraz VS Clar PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
19 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Rublev VS Etcheverry PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 2-6 7-6(10) |
Stats 
Sara Bejlek
Player
Ena Shibahara
65%
(
81 of
125)
1st Serve %
55%
(
59 of
107)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
46%
(
58 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
107)
113
Total Points Won
119
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 17 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 3:5:0 | Average Match Time | 3:5:0 |
| 65% (81/125) | 1st Serve % | 55% (59/107) |
| 54% (44/81) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (34/59) |
| 52% (23/44) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (27/48) |
| 67% (6/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (7/17) |
| 43% (46/107) | Return Points Win % | 46% (58/125) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bejlek vs Shibahara Match Preview :
- Shibahara performs better on second serves, winning 46.85% of points, compared to Bejlek's 39.26%. Could this be a crucial factor in winning matches? It often is.
- In the return game, Bejlek slightly edges out Shibahara by winning 49% of second serve points against 48.8% and excels with a 36.65% success rate on first serve returns compared to Shibahara’s 30.3%.
- When under pressure, Shibahara has demonstrated better breakpoint saving ability with 51.62% compared to Bejlek at 45.32%—a useful prediction tool for betting.
- Overall performance shows Shibahara has a slightly superior win rate in the past year at 62.5% compared to Bejlek's 61.36%.
- Shibahara excels on Indoor hard surfaces with a 67% win rate, whereas Bejlek is dominant on clay, winning 70%. Grass seems to be a weakness for both players, especially Bejlek with a 20% win rate.
- Considering player levels, Bejlek has a slight advantage in winning 65.52% of matches at the Challengers/ITF level, slightly outperforming Shibahara's 60%.
- Bejlek has faced tougher opponents, with an average rank of 185.64 compared to Shibahara’s opponents at 198.25.
- In deciding sets, Shibahara holds the edge with a 61% success rate versus Bejlek’s 50%.
- Bejlek shows superior breakpoint conversion at 47.8% compared to Shibahara’s 36.76%, indicating a knack for seizing opportunities.
Editorial Prediction (May 21, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming tennis clash presents two players, Shibahara and Bejlek, each with their strengths and playing styles. Shibahara's edge in saving breakpoints and superior performance in deciding sets makes her a formidable opponent under pressure. Additionally, her solid performance on second serve is likely to be an advantage.
Bejlek counters with strong return stats, especially on the first serve, and shows proficiency in converting breakpoint opportunities. While she does face tougher competition, her experience on the clay surface might not translate directly if the match is on a different surface.
Given the comparative statistics and current trends, Shibahara’s resilience under pressure and slight edge in overall performance give her a better chance of winning this upcoming match.
Bejlek vs Shibahara Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Sara Bejlek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Tamara Korpatsch
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
44%
(
18 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
21 of
35)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Maya Joint
73%
(
69 of
94)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
96)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
49%
(
34 of
69)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
24%
(
6 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
48%
(
10 of
21)
Break Points Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
57%
(
54 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
55 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Mayar Sherif
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Petra Martic
74%
(
78 of
106)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
45 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
105
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Leyre Romero Gormaz
72%
(
62 of
86)
1st Serve %
53%
(
45 of
85)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
41 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ena Shibahara Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Ena Shibahara
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Alize Cornet
67%
(
74 of
111)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
41%
(
46 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Heather Watson
Player
Ena Shibahara
51%
(
46 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
4
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
2
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nuria Parrizas-Diaz
Player
Ena Shibahara
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Julia Grabher
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Ena Shibahara
65%
(
81 of
125)
1st Serve %
55%
(
59 of
107)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
46%
(
58 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
107)
113
Total Points Won
119
|
7-5 2-6 7-6(10) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Jenny Lim
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yulia Putintseva
Player
Ena Shibahara
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68% (142/68) | Win/Loss | 59% (156/110) |
| 63% (303/180) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (351/268) |
| 55% (2435/1982) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (3029/2666) |
| 59% (26/18) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (109/77) |
| 71% (115/46) | Clay Win/Loss | 53% (17/15) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 69% (24/11) |
| 20% (1/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 46% (6/7) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 75 | Aces Total | 652 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 552 | Total Double Faults | 662 |
| 1:34:39 | Average Match Time | 1:25:40 |
| 317.35 | Average Opponent Rank | 410.72 |
| 72% (10210/14157) | 1st Serve % | 62% (9481/15234) |
| 58% (5906/10210) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (6111/9461) |
| 47% (1842/3947) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2811/5829) |
| 52% (1010/1960) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (800/1775) |
| 49% (6890/13984) | Return Points Win % | 44% (6747/15386) |
| 63% (19/11) | Slam W/L | 63% (5/3) |
| 70% (7/3) | Masters W/L | 43% (3/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 75% (3/1) |
| 50% (6/6) | Main Tour W/L | 43% (20/26) |
| 70% (106/46) | Challenger W/L | 62% (125/76) |
| 67% (4/2) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (139/206) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (153/261) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 61% (27/44) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (34/58) |
| 68% (43/63) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (50/92) |
| 91% (128/117) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (154/134) |
| 8% (128/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (154/19) |
| 30% (82/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (112/21) |
Bejlek vs. Shibahara Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
