Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sara Bejlek vs Celine Naef Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bejlek vs Naef analysis and find out who is favored!
Sara Bejlek vs Celine Naef Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bejlek has won 47.7% of points on his second serve, while Naef has won 47.32%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bejlek, in recent form, has won 55.79% of his opponent's second serve points, while Naef has won 54.37%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.97% and 38.39% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bejlek has saved 54.07% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Naef has saved 57.01% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bejlek has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 38/ 19), with Naef winning 55.17% (W/L 32/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bejlek has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 70% (W/L 82/ 35), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Naef has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 43/ 17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 20/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Bejlek has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 70% of matches (W/L 28/ 12), where as Naef has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.1% of matches (W/L 25/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bejlek has played against opponents with an average rank of 277.67 while Naef has played against players with an average rank of 198.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bejlek has won 54% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Naef has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bejlek has converted 52.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Naef has converted 42.91% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bejlek 0 - 0 Naef
137
Rank
128
High
18
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
158
Rank
121
High
18
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
67% (100-49)
Career Total W/L
68% (84-39)
55% (6-5)
YTD W/L
58% (14-10)
$387,882
Career Prize Money
$169,770
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sara Bejlek | Celine Naef |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (6/5) | 58% (14/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (13/10) | 61% (34/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (110/89) | 56% (285/225) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (11/8) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.07 | 0.35 |
| Aces Total | 7 | 87 |
| DFs per game | 0.34 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 33 | 51 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:15:32 | 1:39:4 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 299.27 | 168.75 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (456/661) | 60% (1009/1669) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (282/456) | 69% (693/1009) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (94/205) | 47% (313/660) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (41/77) | 43% (96/223) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (291/625) | 45% (769/1699) |
| Slam W/L | 75% (3/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Main Tour W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 65% (13/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (6/11) | 58% (14/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 63% (5/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 25% (2/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 87% (15/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 13% (15/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 11% (9/1) |
Sara Bejlek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Diana Shnaider
Player
Sara Bejlek
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
58 of
85)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
35 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
80
|
0-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Raluca Georgiana Serban
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Sara Bejlek
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
80%
(
45 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Sara Bejlek
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
90)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
90)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anhelina Kalinina
Player
Sara Bejlek
36%
(
16 of
44)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
88%
(
14 of
16)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
19 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Leolia Jeanjean
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Carole Monnet
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leylah Annie Fernandez
Player
Sara Bejlek
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Ankita Raina
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Celine Naef Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Celine Naef
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Celine Naef
71%
(
77 of
109)
1st Serve %
62%
(
70 of
113)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
49 of
70)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
116
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(8) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mona Barthel
Player
Celine Naef
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
12
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
72%
(
23 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
98
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Joanna Garland
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Celine Naef
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
70 of
110)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
110)
104
Total Points Won
106
|
6-2 1-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Celine Naef
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Jana Fett
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
94)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Himeno Sakatsume
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
86%
(
30 of
35)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Tereza Martincova
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Bejlek Vs Naef Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
