S. Kopp
To Win
A. J. Mano
To Win
Sandro Kopp vs Gastao Elias Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W L L W W
Form
W W W W L W W W L LHead-2-Head: Kopp 1 - 0 Elias
They have played 3 sets in total, with Kopp winning 2 and Elias winning 1. The last match between Kopp and Elias was at the M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio, 15-02-2025, Semifinals, Hard with Sandro Kopp getting the victory 4-6 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sandro Kopp | 1 |
| Gastao Elias | 0 |
M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio(15-02-2025)
4
6
6
4
6
3
| Kopp | Stats | Elias |
|---|---|---|
| 62% (13-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 64% (14-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 384 | Ranking | 332 |
| 307 | Highest Rank | 57 |
| 24 | Age | 34 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 5 | Titles | 17 |
| 57% (242-179) | Career Total W/L | 56% (569-454) |
| $5,660 | Career Prize Money | $414,541 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
28 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Mensik VS Fritz PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
29 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Pegula PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
28 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Sandro Kopp
Player
Gastao Elias
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
99)
3
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
99)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 13 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:25:44 | Average Match Time | 2:25:44 |
| 67% (53/79) | 1st Serve % | 56% (55/99) |
| 70% (37/53) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (34/55) |
| 58% (15/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (24/44) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (3/8) |
| 41% (41/99) | Return Points Win % | 34% (27/79) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sandro Kopp vs Gastao Elias Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sandro Kopp 1 - 0 Gastao Elias
- Noteworthy second serve performance: In the past six months, Kopp has demonstrated exceptional prowess, winning an impressive 53.86% of points on their second serve. Comparatively, Elias has achieved a respectable 44.77% success rate. This statistical correlation holds significant implications for the accuracy of match predictions.
- Pertinent return game statistics: Analyzing return stats from recent encounters, Kopp has effectively seized 49.1% of their opponent's second-serve points, underscoring their proficiency in this aspect of the game. Elias, on the other hand, has achieved a commendable 53.07% success rate. First-serve returns present a similar trend, with Kopp at 29.73% and Elias at 34.33% respectively. These percentages carry substantial weight in determining the favored contender in this head-to-head match-up.
- Under pressure assessment: When confronted with pressure situations, Kopp has displayed admirable deftness, saving 55.05% of breakpoints in recent form. Elias, not far behind, has showcased resilience by saving 54.42% of breakpoints. This particular statistic proves invaluable when delving into in-game betting predictions.
- Summarized performance overview: Over the course of the last year, Kopp has emerged triumphant in an impressive 60.94% of matches played (W/L 39/25). Elias, equally formidable, has secured victory in 52.86% of their matches (W/L 37/33). This comprehensive overview allows us to make an informed prediction regarding their impending clash.
- Optimal surface proficiency: Kopp's career trajectory reveals their mastery on clay courts, boasting a remarkable 58% win rate (W/L 175/127). However, they find themselves slightly less dominant on hard courts, having secured victories in 52% of matches (W/L 22/20). Elias, in turn, excels on clay courts, clinching victories in 57% of encounters (W/L 363/269). Conversely, their competence diminishes on grass, with a win rate of merely 25% (W/L 3/9).
- Player classification: Analyzing matches from the past year, it becomes evident that Kopp primarily participates in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a $10K prize, where they have achieved a remarkable 79.41% win rate (W/L 27/7). In contrast, Elias predominantly competes in Challengers/ITF tournaments with a prize exceeding $10K, maintaining a respectable 50.79% win rate (W/L 32/31). When comparing statistical data between the players to predict the favored contender, it is crucial to consider the caliber of the events they have participated in.
- Opponent quality scrutiny: Examining the past 12 months, Kopp has encountered opponents with an average ranking of 359.95. Elias, on the other hand, has competed against players with an average ranking of 313.27. This information provides valuable insights into the level of competition each player has faced.
- Decisive set performance analysis: For those seeking live predictions and betting opportunities, it is noteworthy that Kopp has emerged victorious in 56% of deciding sets played in the past year. Elias, too, has displayed commendable form, winning 53% of all matches played on the professional circuit. These statistics are particularly significant in the context of matches that extend to decisive sets.
- Current event head-to-head statistics: While previous player performances offer valuable foresight in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to assess the current event statistics to gauge a player's present form. For the most accurate indication of an in-form player, one should refer to the section below (provided they have already participated in the current event). It is crucial to acknowledge that certain players excel particularly well at specific events, and this fact should factor into the outcome prediction.
- Break point conversion proficiency: Recent performances reveal that Kopp possesses adeptness in converting breakpoint opportunities, capitalizing on an impressive 45.19% of such chances. Elias, equally formidable, boasts a conversion rate of 51.31% when it comes to breaking their opponents' serves. These figures serve as impactful metrics for in-game live betting tips, especially when either player faces a critical breakpoint opportunity.
- If you possess an inclination towards models that accurately predict tennis match outcomes, you may find this article to be an enlightening starting point. (Warning: Reserved for the devoted statistics enthusiasts.)
Sandro Kopp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Sandro Kopp
Player
Julio Cesar Porras
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
81%
(
76 of
94)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
84
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sandro Kopp
Player
Ryan Nijboer
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
45%
(
26 of
58)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Neumayer
Player
Sandro Kopp
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
51%
(
26 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
50
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Sandro Kopp
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sandro Kopp
Player
Andrej Nedic
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
92%
(
58 of
63)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sandro Kopp
Player
Dominik Kellovsky
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sandro Kopp
Player
Matthias Ujvary
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
74%
(
70 of
94)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
87
Total Points Won
71
|
6-0 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sandro Kopp
Player
Andrea Meduri
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
45 of
82)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
63
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Antonio Serrano Luis
Player
Sandro Kopp
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sandro Kopp
Player
Francisco Rocha
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Gastao Elias Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Lukas Neumayer
Player
Gastao Elias
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tiago Pereira
Player
Gastao Elias
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
89)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
34 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Francisco Rocha
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Cannon Kingsley
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
47%
(
35 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 7-5 10-6 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Gastao Elias
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 6-7(0) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Cannon Kingsley
47%
(
43 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
76 of
116)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
45 of
76)
42%
(
20 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
41 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
54 of
116)
104
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(3) 7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Ryan Peniston
45%
(
9 of
20)
1st Serve %
40%
(
2 of
5)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
7 of
9)
1st Serve Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
13
Total Points Won
12
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
50%
(
59 of
118)
1st Serve %
60%
(
62 of
103)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
42%
(
25 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
45%
(
53 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
103)
117
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(2) 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Sergey Fomin
49%
(
44 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
39 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (242/179) | Win/Loss | 56% (569/454) |
| 56% (543/423) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (1299/1128) |
| 52% (4667/4307) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (11876/11042) |
| 52% (25/23) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (171/132) |
| 58% (181/129) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (363/270) |
| 57% (36/27) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43% (32/43) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 25% (3/9) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 865 | Aces Total | 2952 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 592 | Total Double Faults | 2277 |
| 1:21:20 | Average Match Time | 1:20:54 |
| 417.68 | Average Opponent Rank | 548.61 |
| 68% (15174/22302) | 1st Serve % | 54% (30903/57188) |
| 66% (9952/15174) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (21728/30903) |
| 51% (3618/7128) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (13112/26281) |
| 42% (962/2281) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (2590/5991) |
| 40% (9060/22644) | Return Points Win % | 41% (23637/58177) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 40% (19/28) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 8% (1/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 44% (7/9) |
| 40% (2/3) | Main Tour W/L | 49% (61/64) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 41% (24/35) | Challenger W/L | 56% (365/286) |
| 61% (216/141) | Futures W/L | 68% (115/54) |
| 57% (239/417) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (554/978) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 37% (11/30) |
| 52% (60/115) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (143/304) |
| 50% (64/127) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (216/363) |
| 84% (244/205) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (510/431) |
| 16% (244/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (510/77) |
| 20% (177/36) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (510/138) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Sandro Kopp
View full predicted draw for Kopp
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
