Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sandra Zaniewska vs Dana Kremer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zaniewska vs Kremer analysis and find out who is favored!
Sandra Zaniewska vs Dana Kremer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zaniewska has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Kremer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zaniewska, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kremer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zaniewska has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kremer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zaniewska has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Kremer winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zaniewska has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 69% (W/L 134/ 60), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 4/ 5). Kremer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 16/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zaniewska winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Zaniewska winning 2 and Kremer winning 0. The last match between Zaniewska and Kremer was at the Aschaffenburg, 11-07-2016, Q2 round, Clay with Sandra Zaniewska getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zaniewska and Kremer have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zaniewska winning 0 times and Kremer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zaniewska winning 0, and Kremer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zaniewska has played against opponents with an average rank of while Kremer has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zaniewska has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kremer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zaniewska has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kremer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zaniewska 1 - 0 Kremer
Ret.
Rank
142
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
472
High
26
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
64% (224-124)
Career Total W/L
57% (102-76)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$18,965
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sandra Zaniewska | Dana Kremer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sandra Zaniewska | Dana Kremer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sandra Zaniewska Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Katharina Hobgarski
Player
Sandra Zaniewska
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
47%
(
36 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Karolina Muchova
Player
Sandra Zaniewska
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
9
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
46 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| F |
Stats
Camilla Scala
Player
Sandra Zaniewska
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve %
88%
(
83 of
94)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
48%
(
32 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
94)
82
Total Points Won
78
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Dana Kremer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yuliya Lysa
Player
Dana Kremer
49%
(
20 of
41)
1st Serve %
47%
(
18 of
38)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
10
60%
(
12 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
48
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| F |
Stats
Dana Kremer
Player
Julie Gervais
50%
(
41 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
37%
(
15 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
50%
(
41 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
44 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Dana Kremer
Player
Catherine Chantraine
45%
(
42 of
93)
1st Serve %
50%
(
42 of
84)
6
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
5
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
33%
(
17 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
47%
(
44 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dana Kremer
Player
Irina Cantos Siemers
70%
(
67 of
96)
1st Serve %
66%
(
73 of
110)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
52%
(
35 of
67)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
35%
(
8 of
23)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
51%
(
49 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
58 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dana Kremer
Player
Kassandra Davesne
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve %
69%
(
20 of
29)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
83%
(
24 of
29)
49
Total Points Won
14
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Catherine Chantraine
Player
Dana Kremer
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
39%
(
20 of
51)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Vlada Katic
Player
Dana Kremer
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dana Kremer
Player
Eliessa Vanlangendonck
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
50%
(
39 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Zaniewska Vs Kremer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
