Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sandra Samir vs Chloe Paquet Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Samir vs Paquet analysis and find out who is favored!
Sandra Samir vs Chloe Paquet Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Samir has won 48.23% of points on his second serve, while Paquet has won 45.68%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Samir, in recent form, has won 57.82% of his opponent's second serve points, while Paquet has won 55.52%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.16% and 39.97% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Samir has saved 49.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paquet has saved 52.48% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Samir has won 65.28% of matches played (W/L 47/ 25), with Paquet winning 52.05% (W/L 38/ 35) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Samir has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 195/ 107), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3). Paquet has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 220/ 192), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 4/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Samir has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75.47% of matches (W/L 40/ 13), where as Paquet has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.7% of matches (W/L 29/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Samir winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Samir winning 3 and Paquet winning 2. The last match between Samir and Paquet was at the Tunis, 04-05-2016, First, Clay with Chloe Paquet getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:22:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Samir and Paquet have played a deciding set 1 times, with Samir winning 0 times and Paquet 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Samir winning 0, and Paquet 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Samir has played against opponents with an average rank of 151.92 while Paquet has played against players with an average rank of 257.73.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Samir has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paquet has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Samir has converted 49.56% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paquet has converted 41.69% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Samir 1 - 1 Paquet
516
Rank
342
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
149
Rank
101
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
64% (426-243)
Career Total W/L
52% (389-363)
75% (18-6)
YTD W/L
48% (10-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$218,175
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sandra Samir | Chloe Paquet |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 29 | 26 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 11 | 15 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:22:30 | 1:22:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (73/127) | 45% (47/104) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 58% (42/73) | 55% (26/47) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 41% (22/54) | 42% (24/57) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 54% (7/13) | 37% (7/19) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (54/104) | 50% (63/127) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(7) 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Chloe Paquet
Player
Sandra Samir
45%
(
47 of
104)
1st Serve %
57%
(
73 of
127)
5
Aces
1
15
Double Faults
11
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
73)
42%
(
24 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
52%
(
54 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
63 of
127)
113
Total Points Won
118
|
||||
| 7-5 7-5 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sandra Samir | Chloe Paquet |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 75% (18/6) | 48% (10/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 71% (39/16) | 48% (23/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 58% (290/211) | 51% (216/208) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 75% (18/6) | 36% (4/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.18 |
| Aces Total | 48 | 38 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.43 |
| DFs Total | 64 | 88 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:35 | 1:51:49 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 212.25 | 285.57 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (820/1489) | 59% (807/1370) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (524/820) | 62% (501/807) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (331/669) | 45% (255/563) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (106/219) | 38% (85/222) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (720/1491) | 46% (700/1514) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 53% (8/7) |
| Futures W/L | 78% (18/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (18/24) | 48% (10/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 20% (1/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (21/18) | 78% (9/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (21/3) | 22% (9/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 25% (12/3) |
Sandra Samir Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Julie Belgraver
Player
Sandra Samir
48%
(
32 of
67)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Ella Mcdonald
47%
(
17 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Katarina Kuzmova
Player
Sandra Samir
51%
(
36 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
65
|
4-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
46%
(
32 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Liisa Varul
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
18 of
33)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
51
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Gaia Parravicini
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Laura Samsonova
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Arlinda Rushiti
53%
(
40 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Alisa Kummel
51%
(
50 of
99)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
49%
(
24 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
6-1 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Mana Ayukawa
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Chloe Paquet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Chloe Paquet
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Andreea Mitu
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Aurora Zantedeschi
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
77 of
108)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
54 of
108)
110
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(4) 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Chloe Paquet
74%
(
65 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
82%
(
46 of
56)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
21 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Nikola Bartunkova
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
90)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
12
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
52%
(
50 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Jessica Bertoldo
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
Player
Chloe Paquet
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
83)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
16
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
92
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Chloe Paquet
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
1-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Samir Vs Paquet Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Sandra Samir
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Chloe Paquet
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
