Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Matchstat.com expert prediction for the Jong Natale H2H. Here is our in-depth stats analysis and accurate prediction of the Jong Natale head to head.
Full Stats Used To Calculate Our Jong Vs Natale Prediction Are Further Down This Page. Here Is A Brief Snapshot
The best career year for Jong was 2023 when he won 71% of matches played on all surfaces (36/15). Natale was in the best form in 2023 when he had victories of 59% of his matches (30/21). In their last event played, Natale made the Q2 round at M25 Antalya, whereas Jong played M15 Zahra and made the Quarterfinals.
611
Rank
600
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
Form
64% (52-29)
Career Total W/L
50% (66-66)
71% (36-15)
YTD W/L
59% (30-21)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sander Jong | Gian Matias Di Natale |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:0 | 1:31:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (27/43) | 55% (39/71) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 85% (23/27) | 62% (24/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (9/16) | 44% (14/32) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (33/71) | 26% (11/43) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Recent Form Is Very Important In Predicting An Upcoming H2H. Recent Matches With Stats…
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Sander Jong
Player
Gian Matias Di Natale
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
55%
(
39 of
71)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sander Jong | Gian Matias Di Natale |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (36/15) | 59% (30/21) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (74/39) | 57% (65/50) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (595/441) | 53% (566/497) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 72% (28/11) | 63% (29/17) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 75% (6/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.38 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 190 | 56 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.17 |
| DFs Total | 129 | 87 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:26 | 1:12:33 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 165.14 | 120.1 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1948/3101) | 63% (1388/2216) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (1385/1948) | 64% (882/1388) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (574/1153) | 48% (400/828) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (168/363) | 45% (108/239) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (1405/3253) | 42% (949/2251) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 72% (36/14) | 62% (29/18) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 70% (35/50) | 59% (30/51) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (3/12) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (9/12) | 62% (8/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (34/32) | 87% (30/26) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (34/2) | 13% (30/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 24% (17/4) | 19% (21/4) |
Sander Jong Matches Played
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Dax Donders
Player
Sander Jong
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Sander Jong
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Emilien Demanet
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
73%
(
51 of
70)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Carlo Alberto Fossati
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Sander Jong
63%
(
72 of
115)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
41 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
40 of
103)
114
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Tomas Lanik
53%
(
10 of
19)
1st Serve %
81%
(
22 of
27)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
90%
(
9 of
10)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
32
Total Points Won
14
|
6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Marko Topo
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Arslanbek Aitkulov
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Tibo Colson
Player
Sander Jong
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
11
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Gian Matias Di Natale Matches Played
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Federico Campana
Player
Gian Matias Di Natale
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
47%
(
36 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-4 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Gian Matias Di Natale
Player
S Mert Ozdemir
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
33 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
61
|
1-6 6-4 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Handel
Player
Gian Matias Di Natale
51%
(
38 of
75)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gian Matias Di Natale
Player
Yannik Kelm
67%
(
74 of
111)
1st Serve %
62%
(
74 of
119)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
49%
(
36 of
74)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
55%
(
11 of
20)
Break Points Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
55%
(
61 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
66 of
119)
116
Total Points Won
114
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Bertuccioli
Player
Gian Matias Di Natale
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Gian Matias Di Natale
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gian Matias Di Natale
Player
Pietro Marino
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gian Matias Di Natale
Player
Marco Dessi
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
31%
(
8 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
70
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 1-6 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Jong Vs Natale Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
