Samir Banerjee vs Nikita Filin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does second serve performance impact match predictions? In recent performances, Banerjee has won 42.96% of points on their second serve, while Filin outperforms Banerjee with 51.02%.
• Looking at return game stats, Banerjee consistently wins 45.65% of their opponent's second serve points, showing a clear advantage over Filin, who wins 35.06%.
• First serve return performance favors Filin, with a success rate of 32.41%, compared to Banerjee’s 25.61%.
• Both players show resilience under pressure, with Banerjee saving 56.59% of breakpoints, slightly edging out Filin’s 56.25%.
• In terms of overall match performance, Banerjee has a strong track record over the past year, winning 77.42% of matches, whereas Filin has secured victories in 50% of his matches.
• Which surface suits each player best? Banerjee excels on Indoor Hard surfaces, boasting an 85% win rate, whereas Filin finds his strength on Clay, winning 50% of matches.
• Both players predominantly compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, with Banerjee winning a significantly higher percentage (80%) compared to Filin’s 40% win rate.
• Banerjee has faced opponents with a lower average rank of 388.94, while Filin has competed against higher-ranked players, averaging a rank of 84.17.
• In deciding sets, Banerjee exhibits greater efficacy, winning 67% of these matches, compared to Filin’s 50% success rate.
• In recent form, Filin leads in break point conversion, seizing 55.56% of his opportunities, surpassing Banerjee’s 43.21% conversion rate.

Editorial Prediction (September 15, 2025, UTC):

Based on second serve efficiency, Filin holds a distinct edge, outperforming Banerjee considerably. This advantage could prove pivotal during pivotal match phases.

However, Banerjee is more effective in return games, especially against opponents’ second serves, thus providing a potential counterbalance to Filin’s serving prowess.

Considering resilience under pressure, Banerjee shows marginally better performance in saving breakpoints, although both display similar capabilities.

Surface preferences highlight Banerjee's dominance on Indoor Hard surfaces, offering a strategic advantage if the match is on this surface.

Overall match experience and fitness levels favor Banerjee, with superior win percentages both generally and in deciding sets, suggesting robust mental and physical endurance.

Given the collected data and performance analysis, Banerjee is poised as the likely winner for this upcoming tennis showdown.