search

Samantha Vickers vs Emma Flood Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vickers vs Flood analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Samantha Vickers vs Emma Flood Important H2H Prediction Stats:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vickers has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Flood has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vickers, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Flood has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Vickers has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Flood has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Vickers has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Flood winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Vickers has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 10/ 7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Flood has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 20/ 12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 43/ 57).
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vickers has played against opponents with an average rank of while Flood has played against players with an average rank of .
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vickers has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Flood has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Vickers has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Flood has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
bet365

Head-to-head: Vickers 0 - 0 Flood

Samantha Vickers

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

Ret.

Rank

High

32

Age

Plays

0

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

Ret.

Rank

483

High

33

Age

Plays

Emma Flood

3

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

3

Minor

0

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

W W L W W L W W W L

Form

W W W L W L L L L L

44% (21-27)

Career Total W/L

48% (112-121)

0% (0-0)

YTD W/L

0% (0-0)

$0

Career Prize Money

$0

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

Vickers VS Flood H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
w/o

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Samantha Vickers Emma Flood
YTD W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Sets Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Games Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Hard Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0 0
Aces Total 0 0
DFs per game 0 0
DFs Total 0 0
Avg Match Time 1st Match 1st Match
Avg Opp Rank 0 0
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% Total 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Return Pts W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)

Samantha Vickers Recent Matches Played

Emma Flood Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
R1
cross
Miriam Kolodziejova
Player
Emma Flood
76% ( 16 of 21)
1st Serve %
63% ( 10 of 16)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
81% ( 13 of 16)
1st Serve Won
30% ( 3 of 10)
60% ( 3 of 5)
2nd Serve Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
24% ( 5 of 21)
Rtn Points Won
75% ( 12 of 16)
28
Total Points Won
9
L
6-0 1-0 ret. H2H
R1
cross
Polina Vinogradova
Player
Emma Flood
57% ( 45 of 79)
1st Serve %
55% ( 47 of 86)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
11
69% ( 31 of 45)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 28 of 47)
50% ( 17 of 34)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 17 of 39)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
75% ( 3 of 4)
39% ( 31 of 79)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 41 of 86)
89
Total Points Won
76
L
6-3 3-6 6-2 H2H
Q1
L
6-2 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Elyne Boeykens
Player
Emma Flood
74% ( 49 of 66)
1st Serve %
60% ( 43 of 72)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
65% ( 32 of 49)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 26 of 43)
53% ( 9 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 12 of 29)
36% ( 4 of 11)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
38% ( 25 of 66)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 34 of 72)
75
Total Points Won
63
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Yixuan Li
Player
Emma Flood
58% ( 41 of 71)
1st Serve %
44% ( 36 of 81)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
12
63% ( 26 of 41)
1st Serve Won
75% ( 27 of 36)
63% ( 19 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 17 of 45)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
33% ( 2 of 6)
37% ( 26 of 71)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 37 of 81)
82
Total Points Won
70
L
7-6(3) 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Emma Flood
Player
Anna Makhorkina
60% ( 30 of 50)
1st Serve %
50% ( 33 of 66)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
77% ( 23 of 30)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 19 of 33)
40% ( 8 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 11 of 33)
40% ( 6 of 15)
Break Points Won
60% ( 3 of 5)
38% ( 19 of 50)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 36 of 66)
67
Total Points Won
49
W
6-3 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Emma Laine
Player
Emma Flood
67% ( 46 of 69)
1st Serve %
58% ( 36 of 62)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
61% ( 28 of 46)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 21 of 36)
52% ( 12 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
31% ( 8 of 26)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
22% ( 2 of 9)
42% ( 29 of 69)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 33 of 62)
73
Total Points Won
58
L
6-2 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Emma Flood
Player
Kelly Versteeg
46% ( 18 of 39)
1st Serve %
50% ( 26 of 52)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
83% ( 15 of 18)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 13 of 26)
67% ( 14 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 11 of 26)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
26% ( 10 of 39)
Rtn Points Won
54% ( 28 of 52)
57
Total Points Won
34
W
6-2 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Emma Flood
Player
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
58% ( 28 of 48)
1st Serve %
55% ( 18 of 33)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
82% ( 23 of 28)
1st Serve Won
39% ( 7 of 18)
50% ( 10 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
27% ( 4 of 15)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
31% ( 15 of 48)
Rtn Points Won
67% ( 22 of 33)
55
Total Points Won
26
W
6-0 6-1 H2H
F
cross
Emma Flood
Player
Melanie Stokke
53% ( 33 of 62)
1st Serve %
60% ( 33 of 55)
4
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
6
76% ( 25 of 33)
1st Serve Won
45% ( 15 of 33)
34% ( 10 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 8 of 22)
60% ( 6 of 10)
Break Points Won
43% ( 3 of 7)
44% ( 27 of 62)
Rtn Points Won
58% ( 32 of 55)
67
Total Points Won
50
W
6-2 6-4 H2H

Vickers Vs Flood Prediction H2H Images To Share

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions