Sam Young-Mathers vs Matthew Hulme Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W W L L L
Form
W W W L W L L W L LHead To Head: Young-Mathers 0 - 1 Hulme
They have played 2 sets in total, with Young-Mathers winning 0 and Hulme winning 2. The last match between Young-Mathers and Hulme was at the M25 Burnie, 18-02-2025, First, Hard with Matthew Hulme getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sam Young-Mathers | 0 |
| Matthew Hulme | 1 |
M25 Burnie(18-02-2025)
6
2
6
1
| Young-Mathers | Stats | Hulme |
|---|---|---|
| 40% (2-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (7-7) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| N/A | Ranking | 793 |
| Highest Rank | 777 | |
| 20 | Age | 26 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 41% (7-10) | Career Total W/L | 50% (64-64) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Zverev VS Fils PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
26 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS Berrettini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
27 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Young-Mathers VS Hulme H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Matthew Hulme
Player
Sam Young-Mathers
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
Young-Mathers VS Hulme H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 3 | Games Won | 12 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:2:52 | Average Match Time | 1:2:52 |
| 67% (31/46) | 1st Serve % | 80% (37/46) |
| 52% (16/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (26/37) |
| 20% (3/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (5/9) |
| 20% (1/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 63% (5/8) |
| 33% (15/46) | Return Points Win % | 59% (27/46) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sam Young-Mathers vs Matthew Hulme Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sam Young-Mathers 0 - 1 Matthew Hulme
- Recent Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, there has been a noticeable discrepancy in the second serve performance of Young-Mathers and Hulme. Young-Mathers has managed to secure victory in 44% of the points won on their second serve, whereas Hulme has exhibited a slightly higher success rate of 57.19%. It is worth highlighting the strong correlation that exists between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Return Game Statistics: Shedding light on their recent form, Young-Mathers has demonstrated impressive prowess in return games. Against their opponents' second serve, Young-Mathers has triumphed in an impressive 68.18% of the points, while Hulme has achieved a less remarkable success rate of 44.96%. Similar trends can be observed in first-serve returns, where Young-Mathers has secured victory in 30.77% of the points compared to Hulme's slightly lower rate of 28.65%. This data significantly aids in determining the favored player in this head-to-head matchup.
- Under Pressure Analysis: Examining how players handle pressure, it is evident that Young-Mathers has effectively saved 57.14% of breakpoints in recent matches. In contrast, Hulme has showcased an impressive ability to save 68.13% of breakpoints. Undoubtedly, such statistics serve as valuable indicators for those involved in in-game betting predictions.
- Performance Overview: Assessing the players' performance over the past year, several intriguing insights emerge. Young-Mathers has emerged victorious in 66.67% of the matches played (W/L 4/2), while Hulme boasts a slightly lower success rate of 48.84% (W/L 21/22). Consequently, these figures contribute to providing a comprehensive head-to-head prediction overview.
- Surface Specialization: Delving into the players' preferences in terms of playing surfaces, Young-Mathers has achieved their best career surface win percentage on Hard courts, solidifying victory in 50% of their matches (W/L 7/7). Conversely, this success rate decreases when competing on clay courts, with a corresponding win percentage of 50% (W/L 7/7). Conversely, Hulme thrives on Grass courts, where their win percentage stands at an impressive 60% (W/L 3/2). On the other hand, they struggle on Indoor Hard courts, securing a mere 0% win rate (W/L 0/3).
- Player Level: An analysis of their recent matches reveals that Young-Mathers has primarily competed in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments worth $10K. Demonstrating exceptional command, they have emerged victorious in 66.67% of their matches (W/L 4/2). Conversely, Hulme has participated in a similar assortment of tournaments, yet their success rate stands at a slightly lower 47.06% (W/L 16/18). When evaluating players' statistics to predict favorites, it is essential to consider the relative level of the events in which they have been competing.
- Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the course of the last 12 months, Young-Mathers has frequently faced opponents boasting an average rank of 142.5. In contrast, Hulme's opponents have possessed an average rank of 322.4.
- Deciding Set Performance: For those keen on live predictions and betting, it is crucial to evaluate how the players perform in deciding sets. Young-Mathers has astoundingly emerged victorious in 100% of their deciding sets over the past year. On the other hand, Hulme has recorded a respectable win rate of 56% in all matches played on the professional tour.
- Current Event H2H Stats: While past player performances undoubtedly hold weight in predicting the outcome of tennis matches, current event statistics also deserve attention. It is essential to monitor the performance of players within the ongoing event, as these insights offer indications of who is currently in excellent form. To access the relevant statistics, please refer to the section below.
- Break Point Conversion: Recent data indicates that when presented with a breakpoint opportunity, Young-Mathers has demonstrated remarkable proficiency, converting 100% of these chances. In contrast, Hulme's success rate stands at 45.76% when attempting to break their opponents' serves. These statistics should undoubtedly be factored into in-game live betting tips when players find themselves in such pivotal moments.
- If you are intrigued by models that excel in predicting tennis match outcomes, I recommend diving into this insightful article (Warning: Recommended for statistical enthusiasts only).
Sam Young-Mathers Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-7(6) 6-1 12-10 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Sam Young-Mathers
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sam Young-Mathers
Player
Ethan Cook
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 4-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(2) ret. | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 5-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Matthew Hulme Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Matthew Hulme
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
46 of
85)
9
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Omar Jasika
Player
Matthew Hulme
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
James Watt
75%
(
55 of
73)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
5
Aces
16
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
48 of
55)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
51 of
62)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
0%
(
0 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
16%
(
12 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
23 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(4) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Braithwaite
Player
Matthew Hulme
74%
(
74 of
100)
1st Serve %
73%
(
84 of
115)
5
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
59 of
84)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
30 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
42 of
115)
112
Total Points Won
103
|
5-7 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Shintaro Imai
Player
Matthew Hulme
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
3
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Sam Young-Mathers
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Matthew Hulme
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Yi Zhou
73%
(
73 of
100)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
10
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
91
|
0-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cruz Hewitt
76%
(
63 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Tsung-Hao Huang
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 41% (7/10) | Win/Loss | 50% (64/64) |
| 37% (13/22) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (151/149) |
| 43% (142/185) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (1563/1508) |
| 44% (7/9) | Hard Win/Loss | 52% (55/50) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 42% (5/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.33 |
| 5 | Aces Total | 502 |
| 0.02 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 197 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:13:44 |
| 199.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 288.43 |
| 64% (93/145) | 1st Serve % | 68% (4460/6546) |
| 55% (51/93) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (3112/4460) |
| 31% (16/52) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1063/2086) |
| 55% (6/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (183/467) |
| 38% (56/146) | Return Points Win % | 35% (2241/6405) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 50% (8/8) |
| 41% (7/10) | Futures W/L | 50% (56/56) |
| 33% (5/15) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (62/126) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (22/53) |
| 67% (2/3) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (20/44) |
| 88% (8/7) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 79% (63/50) |
| 13% (8/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 21% (63/13) |
| 0% (9/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (65/14) |
See recent tennis photos of Young-Mathers and Hulme
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
