Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Salvatore Caruso vs Frederico Gil Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Caruso vs Gil analysis and find out who is favored!
Salvatore Caruso vs Frederico Gil Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Caruso has won 48.91% of points on his second serve, while Gil has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Caruso, in recent form, has won 56.36% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gil has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.21% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Caruso has saved 52.46% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gil has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Caruso has won 50% of matches played (W/L 35/ 35), with Gil winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Caruso has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 253/ 197), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 41/ 54). Gil has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 224/ 131), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 4/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Caruso has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.9% of matches (W/L 22/ 27), where as Gil has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Caruso winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Caruso winning 2 and Gil winning 0. The last match between Caruso and Gil was at the Italy F23, 17-08-2015, Second, Clay with Salvatore Caruso getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Caruso and Gil have played a deciding set 0 times, with Caruso winning 0 times and Gil 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Caruso winning 0, and Gil 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Caruso has played against opponents with an average rank of 272.5 while Gil has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Caruso has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gil has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Caruso has converted 48.39% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gil has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Caruso 1 - 0 Gil
361
Rank
76
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
62
High
39
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
54% (417-355)
Career Total W/L
59% (597-422)
47% (9-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$927,160
Career Prize Money
$437,805
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Salvatore Caruso | Frederico Gil |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Salvatore Caruso | Frederico Gil |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (9/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 47% (23/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (215/220) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 47% (8/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 42 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 53 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:48 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 247.21 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (734/1315) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (482/734) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (285/581) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (68/140) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (558/1351) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (7/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (9/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 55% (6/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (9/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Salvatore Caruso Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Gabriele Piraino
Player
Salvatore Caruso
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
71%
(
24 of
34)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
57%
(
13 of
23)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
45%
(
15 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
39
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Pietro Marino
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alec Beckley
Player
Salvatore Caruso
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
61 of
91)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Diogo Marques
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
1
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
0
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
31%
(
11 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
47%
(
39 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hynek Barton
Player
Salvatore Caruso
53%
(
43 of
81)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
17
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Salvatore Caruso
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Timofey Skatov
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Salvatore Caruso
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Jesper De Jong
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Mitchell Krueger
52%
(
49 of
94)
1st Serve %
65%
(
75 of
116)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
48 of
75)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
116)
110
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Frederico Gil Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Frederico Gil
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Frederico Gil
Player
Andre Stewart
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harry Wendelken
Player
Frederico Gil
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
Player
Frederico Gil
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Simon Carr
Player
Frederico Gil
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frederico Gil
Player
Riccardo Maiga
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
50%
(
46 of
92)
5
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
12
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
36 of
46)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
92)
96
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eduardo Struvay
Player
Frederico Gil
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
5
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
13 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
38
Total Points Won
35
|
5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Frederico Gil
Player
Marat Deviatiarov
61%
(
64 of
105)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
50 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
90
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frederico Gil
Player
Riccardo Maiga
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
44%
(
31 of
70)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
10
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
35 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 0-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Caruso Vs Gil Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
