Salma Ewing vs Marcella Cruz Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W W W L W L
Form
L W L W L W W L W LHead-2-Head: Ewing 1 - 0 Cruz
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ewing winning 2 and Cruz winning 0. The last match between Ewing and Cruz was at the W35 Jackson, 02-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Salma Ewing getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Salma Ewing | 1 |
| Marcella Cruz | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W35 Jackson(02-04-2025)
Salma Ewing
Marcella Cruz
6
4
6
1
| Ewing | Stats | Cruz |
|---|---|---|
| 52% (12-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 54% (7-6) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 715 | Ranking | N/A |
| 652 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 24 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 58% (98-71) | Career Total W/L | 45% (15-18) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Nishikori VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Todoni VS Pegula PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Salma Ewing
Player
Marcella Cruz
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:49:39 | Average Match Time | 1:49:39 |
| 55% (36/65) | 1st Serve % | 67% (31/46) |
| 64% (23/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (18/31) |
| 69% (20/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (8/15) |
| 100% (3/3) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 43% (20/46) | Return Points Win % | 34% (22/65) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ewing vs Cruz Match Preview :
In recent months, performance on the second serve offers a telling comparison between the two players. Cruz has secured 36.28% of points on their second serve, whereas Ewing has won 41.4%. This metric is closely related to predicting match outcomes.
Analyzing return statistics, Ewing demonstrates a stronger recent form. Ewing has won 51.39% of opponents' second serve points, in contrast to Cruz's 40.63%. For first serve returns, Ewing leads with 32.43% compared to Cruz's 26.6%. This higher success rate in return games tends to favor Ewing in head-to-head matchups.
When examining their performance under pressure, Ewing shows a more consistent ability to save breakpoints, achieving a rate of 49.1% compared to Cruz's 38.89%. This becomes significant when making in-game betting predictions, especially when considering moments with potential momentum shifts.
Over the past year, Cruz has maintained a 50% win rate, achieving an 8–8 record. Ewing, on the other hand, has won 42.86% of their matches, or 15 out of 35. Comparing different match settings, both players have their best winning percentages on hard courts, with Ewing at 60% (77/52) and Cruz at 45% (5/6). However, Ewing has a poor record on indoor hard courts, holding a 0% win rate (0/1).
Considering the level of competition, Cruz has faced tougher opponents over the last year with an average rank of 215.5, compared to Ewing's average opponent ranking of 352. This provides insight into the quality of competition each player has confronted.
Regarding the tournament difficulty they usually compete in, Cruz has excelled, especially in Challengers/ITF tournaments above $10K, with a 60% match win rate (6/4). Ewing plays at similar levels but holds a lower success rate of 42.86% (9/12).
If the match extends to a deciding set, historical performance indicates Cruz has the edge, having won 29% of such sets in the past year compared to Ewing's 15% win rate in deciding sets. This could become a critical factor during live predictions.
For break point conversion, Ewing again holds a slight statistical advantage, converting 37.38% of opportunities versus Cruz at 33.33%. This stat often plays a crucial role in determining the outcome of pivotal games throughout a match.
Given the statistics outlined, Ewing appears to have a slight edge overall, particularly with second serve points and return game success. Despite Cruz's advantageous performance against higher-ranked players, Ewing's recent form and pressure play suggest she may be more favored to win this matchup.
Ewing vs Cruz Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Salma Ewing Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Solymar Colling
Player
Salma Ewing
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
92)
0
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
9
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
44%
(
39 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
88
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Salma Ewing
Player
Maddy Zampardo
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
50%
(
35 of
70)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
9
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
59
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Salma Ewing
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Salma Ewing
Player
Madison Sieg
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
11
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
47%
(
34 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Salma Ewing
Player
Christasha McNeil
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
43%
(
36 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
80
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 6-7(4) 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Marcella Cruz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alice Gillan
Player
Marcella Cruz
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 1-6 6-4 10-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Eliz Maloney
Player
Marcella Cruz
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
79%
(
37 of
47)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcella Cruz
Player
Anna Frey
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
26 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Abigail Rencheli
Player
Marcella Cruz
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
76%
(
34 of
45)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (98/71) | Win/Loss | 45% (15/18) |
| 57% (223/169) | Sets Win/Loss | 47% (36/40) |
| 54% (1923/1635) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (348/364) |
| 60% (77/52) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (9/9) |
| 54% (21/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 40% (6/9) |
| 0% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 173 | Aces Total | 24 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.09 |
| 378 | Total Double Faults | 31 |
| 1:4:38 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 400.92 | Average Opponent Rank | 308.03 |
| 57% (3745/6514) | 1st Serve % | 69% (482/703) |
| 62% (2324/3745) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (277/482) |
| 46% (1273/2769) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (103/221) |
| 48% (404/848) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 56% (43/77) |
| 47% (2986/6347) | Return Points Win % | 43% (305/716) |
| 49% (42/43) | Challenger W/L | 50% (9/9) |
| 67% (56/28) | Futures W/L | 40% (6/9) |
| 58% (98/168) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 45% (15/33) |
| 27% (8/30) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 51% (28/55) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (4/10) |
| 82% (104/85) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 75% (16/12) |
| 18% (104/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 25% (16/4) |
| 20% (65/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (17/3) |
Ewing vs. Cruz Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
