Sakura Hosogi vs Alana Parnaby Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W W W W L
Form
L W L W L W L W L LH2H: Hosogi 3 - 1 Parnaby
They have played 8 sets in total, with Hosogi winning 6 and Parnaby winning 2. The last match between Hosogi and Parnaby was at the W35 Burnie, 20-02-2025, Second, Hard with Sakura Hosogi getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sakura Hosogi | 3 |
| Alana Parnaby | 1 |
W35 Burnie(20-02-2025)
6
2
6
1
| Hosogi | Stats | Parnaby |
|---|---|---|
| 74% (20-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 43% (3-4) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 372 | Ranking | 596 |
| 204 | Highest Rank | 428 |
| 25 | Age | 30 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 0 |
| 62% (232-143) | Career Total W/L | 47% (186-212) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 3 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS Berrettini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
27 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Cerundolo VS Dimitrov PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
26 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Sakura Hosogi
Player
Alana Parnaby
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Alana Parnaby
Player
Sakura Hosogi
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
43 of
57)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Sakura Hosogi
Player
Alana Parnaby
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
62)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
50%
(
29 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 7-6(3) 6-2 |
Stats
Sakura Hosogi
Player
Alana Parnaby
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
8
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 44 | Games Won | 30 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 16 |
| 1:37:53 | Average Match Time | 1:37:53 |
| 73% (156/215) | 1st Serve % | 65% (171/262) |
| 63% (98/156) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (97/171) |
| 46% (27/59) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (34/91) |
| 57% (20/35) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (12/24) |
| 50% (131/262) | Return Points Win % | 42% (90/215) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 25% (1/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (3/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (3/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sakura Hosogi vs Alana Parnaby Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sakura Hosogi 3 - 1 Alana Parnaby
Predictions for the Upcoming Tennis Match
In analyzing the performance of the players in recent form, we can extract some valuable insights that could aid in predicting the outcome of the impending tennis match.
Second Serve Performance
Over the past six months, an intriguingly close correlation can be observed between the success rate of points won on the second serve and the accuracy of match predictions. Reflecting on this, Hosogi has exhibited a commendable performance, securing victory in 48.6% of such points. Remarkably close, Parnaby has accomplished a slightly higher rate of 48.67%.
Return Game Statistics
An assessment of return game statistics further highlights the importance of recent form. Analyzing the numbers, we discover that Hosogi has impressively won 61.53% of their opponent's second serve points. Conversely, Parnaby trails marginally behind at 60.1%. Examining the data for first serve returns, the figures rest at 47.61% for Hosogi and 42.28% for Parnaby. This set of statistics plays a pivotal role in determining the favorite in this much-anticipated head-to-head encounter.
Under Pressure Analysis
Under pressure, both players have showcased their abilities to save breakpoints. In recent form, Hosogi has demonstrated remarkable resilience, repelling 54.63% of breakpoints encountered. In a comparable fashion, Parnaby has exhibited their prowess by salvaging 48.45% of such occasions. This insightful statistic could prove highly advantageous in in-game betting predictions.
Performance Overview
By evaluating their performance over the previous year, a clear picture of the players' success rates materializes. Hosogi boasts a commendable 58.46% winning rate, emerging victorious in 38 out of 65 matches played. Meanwhile, Parnaby maintains an admirable 52.08% win ratio, celebrating triumphs in 25 out of 48 matches. Drawing upon these figures, we can formulate a comprehensive overview of their head-to-head encounters.
Best Surface
Considering the players' records on different surfaces, we observe a stark contrast in their respective performances. Hosogi finds their strength on Hard courts, achieving a notable win percentage of 64% out of 293 matches. On the other hand, their proficiency diminishes on Clay, standing at a modest 50% out of 22 matches. In contrast, Parnaby dominates on Indoor Hard courts, boasting an impressive 75% win percentage from 4 matches. However, their success rate plummets to a mere 45% on Clay, winning 38 out of 84 matches played. An examination of these facts is fundamental in assessing their performance and determining the predicted outcome.
Player Level
An examination of the events at which the players have made their mark reveals key details regarding their current level of play. Over the past year, Hosogi has predominantly competed in the Challengers/ITF tournaments with a prize pool exceeding $10K. Out of 50 matches played, they have emerged victorious in 24 encounters, reflecting an admirable 48% success rate. In a similar vein, Parnaby has predominantly participated in the Challengers/ITF tournaments with a prize pool exceeding $10K. They have accumulated an impressive record of 21 victories in 41 matches, resulting in a win percentage of 51.22%. The caliber of the event at which the players perform necessitates relative comparison when predicting the favorite.
Direct Head-to-Head Matches
Our focus shifts to previous encounters between Hosogi and Parnaby in order to gain valuable insights. Having faced each other three times, Hosogi has emerged triumphant twice, while Parnaby has claimed victory on one occasion. The sets played have amounted to six, with Hosogi winning four and Parnaby emerging victorious in two. The most recent clash transpired at the W35 Cairns on the 10th of March 2024, taking place on a Second Hard court. Alana Parnaby reigned supreme with an impressive 6-4 6-3 victory.
Head-to-Head Match Duration
Looking at the historical data, we observe that the average match duration between these players amounts to 1 hour, 45 minutes, and 20 seconds. This statistic offers valuable insight into what can be expected in terms of playing time when these two competitors meet.
Deciding Set Prediction
Throughout their previous encounters, Hosogi and Parnaby have yet to engage in a deciding set. However, such scenarios could prove of crucial significance when determining the ultimate outcome of a match if this forthcoming contest escalates to such intensity.
Extreme Pressure Situations
Under extreme pressure situations, a single tiebreak has been witnessed between Hosogi and Parnaby. On this occasion, Hosogi emerged triumphant, while Parnaby failed to secure victory. This statistic serves as a valuable tool in the prediction of future outcomes in high-pressure moments.
Opponent Quality Statistics
Considering the opponents faced by each player over the past year, notable discrepancies in average opponent rankings emerge. Hosogi, confronted with adversaries boasting an average rank of 455.46, navigated through challenging encounters in order to make their mark. Parnaby, on the other hand, engaged in battles against players sporting an average rank of 307.94. This assessment provides crucial context for predicting the upcoming showdown.
Deciding Set Performance vs. All Players
In scenarios where matches extend into deciding sets, the performance of both Hosogi and Parnaby holds vital importance. Over the past 12 months, Hosogi has achieved victory in 50% of deciding sets played. Remarkably, Parnaby has enjoyed an identical success rate of 50% in all matches played on the tour. These statistics should be judiciously taken into account during the prediction process.
Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics
Whist the historical performance of players undoubtedly offers valuable insight, current event statistics further enable us to assess players' current form. Consequently, it is crucial to scrutinize the relevant section provided below (if available) to ascertain in-form indications. Furthermore, the influence of certain events on individual players' performances must be considered when predicting the ultimate outcome.
Break Point Conversion
Recent form indicates the impressive ability of both players to capitalize on their break point opportunities. Demonstrating sound tactical prowess, Hosogi has converted 52.99% of such chances. Equally, Parnaby has showcased their exceptional prowess by converting 54.43% of breakpoints, suggesting moments of promise for in-game live betting considerations when either player confronts a break point opportunity.
If you wish to delve into models utilized for accurate tennis match predictions, an informative article is recommended as an initial resource. Please note that due to its statistical nature, it is primarily tailored for enthusiasts of such analytical processes.
Sakura Hosogi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Lizette Cabrera
Player
Sakura Hosogi
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
47 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sakura Hosogi
Player
Elena Micic
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
86)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sakura Hosogi
Player
Sarah Mildren
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
19 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
41 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sakura Hosogi
Player
Alicia Smith
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sakura Hosogi
Player
Natalie Gaft
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lizette Cabrera
Player
Sakura Hosogi
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
5
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sakura Hosogi
Player
Monique Barry
75%
(
92 of
123)
1st Serve %
58%
(
63 of
108)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
55%
(
51 of
92)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
43%
(
53 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
108)
120
Total Points Won
111
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sakura Hosogi
Player
Hwiwon Wi
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
14 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sakura Hosogi
Player
Na Hyun Kang
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
74%
(
35 of
47)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
67
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Lizette Cabrera
Player
Sakura Hosogi
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
80%
(
53 of
66)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Alana Parnaby Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ayumi Koshiishi
Player
Alana Parnaby
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sakura Hosogi
Player
Alana Parnaby
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alana Parnaby
Player
Fang An Lin
63%
(
71 of
112)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
109)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
52 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
61 of
109)
121
Total Points Won
100
|
6-0 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Alana Parnaby
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alana Parnaby
Player
Lara Walker
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Karina Miller
Player
Alana Parnaby
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alana Parnaby
Player
Alana Subasic
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
19 of
35)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
64
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Alana Parnaby
76%
(
78 of
102)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
45%
(
46 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
84)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alana Parnaby
Player
Yu-Yun Li
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hikaru Sato
Player
Alana Parnaby
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (232/143) | Win/Loss | 47% (186/212) |
| 60% (507/344) | Sets Win/Loss | 47% (419/471) |
| 55% (4201/3499) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (3972/4032) |
| 64% (192/108) | Hard Win/Loss | 46% (126/148) |
| 50% (11/11) | Clay Win/Loss | 45% (38/46) |
| 49% (18/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (4/3) |
| 69% (11/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 55% (18/15) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 179 | Aces Total | 378 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 935 | Total Double Faults | 1046 |
| 1:25:46 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 478.75 | Average Opponent Rank | 423.19 |
| 70% (15058/21625) | 1st Serve % | 62% (9543/15396) |
| 58% (8720/15058) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (5748/9543) |
| 45% (2959/6567) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (2487/5853) |
| 50% (1597/3180) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (802/1631) |
| 49% (11005/22304) | Return Points Win % | 44% (6397/14484) |
| 0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (137/103) | Challenger W/L | 45% (136/163) |
| 73% (95/36) | Futures W/L | 53% (50/45) |
| 62% (227/369) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 47% (185/397) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (34/68) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (27/57) |
| 54% (55/101) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (46/93) |
| 90% (216/195) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (182/157) |
| 10% (216/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (182/25) |
| 23% (159/36) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (216/29) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
