Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sagadat Ayap vs Ryan Nijboer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ayap vs Nijboer analysis and find out who is favored!
Sagadat Ayap vs Ryan Nijboer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ayap has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Nijboer has won 48.73%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ayap, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nijboer has won 53.6%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 35.38% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ayap has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nijboer has saved 55.83% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ayap has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Nijboer winning 62.64% (W/L 57/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ayap has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 51/ 66), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 10/ 30). Nijboer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 93/ 64), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 24% (W/L 4/ 13).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Ayap winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Ayap winning 3 and Nijboer winning 2. The last match between Ayap and Nijboer was at the M15 Sharm El Sheikh, 13-11-2019, First, Hard with Ryan Nijboer getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:4:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ayap and Nijboer have played a deciding set 1 times, with Ayap winning 0 times and Nijboer 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ayap winning 0, and Nijboer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ayap has played against opponents with an average rank of while Nijboer has played against players with an average rank of 158.68.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ayap has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nijboer has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ayap has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nijboer has converted 46.04% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ayap 1 - 1 Nijboer
Ret.
Rank
886
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
484
Rank
437
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
40% (122-180)
Career Total W/L
56% (214-165)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
52% (12-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$5,735
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sagadat Ayap | Ryan Nijboer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 24 | 20 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:4:0 | 1:4:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (42/72) | 54% (48/89) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (27/42) | 69% (33/48) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (14/30) | 44% (18/41) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 60% (6/10) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (38/89) | 43% (31/72) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Sagadat Ayap
54%
(
48 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
8
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
38 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
82
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| 6-4 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sagadat Ayap | Ryan Nijboer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 52% (12/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (29/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (268/234) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 73% (8/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 44% (4/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.42 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 103 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.39 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 94 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:49:55 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 208.91 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 58% (905/1554) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (635/905) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (324/649) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 46% (82/180) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (681/1614) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (1/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (11/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 52% (12/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 77% (13/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 23% (13/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 20% (10/2) |
Sagadat Ayap Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Grigoriy Lomakin
Player
Sagadat Ayap
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
15
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
3 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sagadat Ayap
Player
Yerassyl Yerdilda
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandr Braynin
Player
Sagadat Ayap
64%
(
7 of
11)
1st Serve %
59%
(
13 of
22)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
6 of
7)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
23
Total Points Won
10
|
5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandr Braynin
Player
Sagadat Ayap
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bogdan Bobrov
Player
Sagadat Ayap
48%
(
23 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 2-6 6-4 13-11 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Mikalai Haliak
Player
Sagadat Ayap
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
4-6 6-1 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 2-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 2-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Ryan Nijboer
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Alexander Zgirovsky
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Ryan Nijboer
46%
(
53 of
116)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
6
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
54%
(
34 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
42 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(5) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Ryan Nijboer
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Robert Strombachs
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Ryan Nijboer
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Ryan Nijboer
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Dali Blanch
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Ryan Nijboer
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
2
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
45 of
61)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
102)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Ayap Vs Nijboer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
