Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sada Nahimana vs Vanda Lukacs Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nahimana vs Lukacs analysis and find out who is favored!
Sada Nahimana vs Vanda Lukacs Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nahimana has won 44.97% of points on his second serve, while Lukacs has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nahimana, in recent form, has won 57.84% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lukacs has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.42% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nahimana has saved 52.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lukacs has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nahimana has won 50.75% of matches played (W/L 34/ 33), with Lukacs winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nahimana has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 40/ 25), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 8/ 10). Lukacs has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 317/ 240), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Nahimana has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.61% of matches (W/L 32/ 30), where as Lukacs has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nahimana winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nahimana winning 2 and Lukacs winning 1. The last match between Nahimana and Lukacs was at the W25 Verbier, 26-08-2021, Second, Clay with Sada Nahimana getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:53:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nahimana and Lukacs have played a deciding set 1 times, with Nahimana winning 1 times and Lukacs 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nahimana winning 0, and Lukacs 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nahimana has played against opponents with an average rank of 270.12 while Lukacs has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nahimana has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lukacs has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nahimana has converted 52.09% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lukacs has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nahimana 1 - 0 Lukacs
381
Rank
244
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
894
Rank
369
High
31
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
60% (158-107)
Career Total W/L
56% (346-273)
55% (11-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$3,960
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sada Nahimana | Vanda Lukacs |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:0 | 1:53:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (45/77) | 51% (39/77) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (30/45) | 67% (26/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (17/32) | 34% (13/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 75% (3/4) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (38/77) | 39% (30/77) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Sada Nahimana
Player
Vanda Lukacs
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
77)
9
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
10
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sada Nahimana | Vanda Lukacs |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (11/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (24/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (204/187) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 62% (8/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.16 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 30 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 72 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:24 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 192.8 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (945/1351) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (553/945) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (176/406) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 55% (87/158) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (595/1279) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 53% (9/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (11/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 85% (13/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 15% (13/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (7/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sada Nahimana Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Sada Nahimana
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Sofia Rocchetti
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve %
85%
(
71 of
84)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
1
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
71
|
6-0 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Emma Lene
86%
(
74 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
10
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
89
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Diana Martynov
84%
(
53 of
63)
1st Serve %
78%
(
50 of
64)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
7
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
48%
(
30 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Elena Milovanovic
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
Player
Sada Nahimana
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Julia Peer
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
59%
(
20 of
34)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Shana Martin Mao
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Sada Nahimana
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
78%
(
54 of
69)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Shana Martin Mao
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
8 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Vanda Lukacs Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Vanda Lukacs
Player
Stefana Lazar
68%
(
64 of
94)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
115)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
7
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
49%
(
46 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
61 of
115)
109
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(3) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Sevcikova
Player
Vanda Lukacs
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
47%
(
27 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Oleksandra Oliynykova
Player
Vanda Lukacs
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve %
65%
(
20 of
31)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
9 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
40
Total Points Won
23
|
6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Vanda Lukacs
Player
Ilinca Dalina Amariei
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
33 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vanda Lukacs
Player
Fabienne Gettwart
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vanda Lukacs
Player
Giulia Tedesco
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
51%
(
27 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vanda Lukacs
Player
Anastasia Piangerelli
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giulia Gatto-Monticone
Player
Vanda Lukacs
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
-
Aces
-
9
Double Faults
8
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
89%
(
8 of
9)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
49%
(
49 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michaela Bayerlova
Player
Vanda Lukacs
65%
(
79 of
122)
1st Serve %
50%
(
52 of
105)
1
Aces
5
12
Double Faults
8
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
44%
(
54 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
105)
117
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(8) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Nahimana Vs Lukacs Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
