Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sada Nahimana vs Thasaporn Naklo Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nahimana vs Naklo analysis and find out who is favored!
Sada Nahimana vs Thasaporn Naklo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nahimana has won 44.97% of points on his second serve, while Naklo has won 45.14%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nahimana, in recent form, has won 57.84% of his opponent's second serve points, while Naklo has won 56.74%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.42% and 34.43% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nahimana has saved 52.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Naklo has saved 44.44% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nahimana has won 50.75% of matches played (W/L 34/ 33), with Naklo winning 65.45% (W/L 36/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nahimana has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 40/ 25), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 8/ 10). Naklo has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 75% (W/L 3/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Nahimana has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.61% of matches (W/L 32/ 30), where as Naklo has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 20/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nahimana has played against opponents with an average rank of 270.12 while Naklo has played against players with an average rank of 149.58.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nahimana has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Naklo has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nahimana has converted 52.09% of breakpoint opportunities, and Naklo has converted 47.15% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nahimana 0 - 0 Naklo
381
Rank
244
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
397
Rank
397
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
60% (158-107)
Career Total W/L
63% (52-30)
55% (11-9)
YTD W/L
29% (4-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sada Nahimana | Thasaporn Naklo |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (11/9) | 29% (4/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (24/21) | 32% (10/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (204/187) | 43% (124/167) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 31% (4/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 62% (8/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.16 | 0.23 |
| Aces Total | 30 | 32 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0.35 |
| DFs Total | 72 | 49 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:24 | 1:30:41 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 192.8 | 247.43 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (945/1351) | 57% (542/943) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (553/945) | 59% (322/542) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (176/406) | 44% (176/401) |
| BPs Won% Total | 55% (87/158) | 46% (42/91) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (595/1279) | 41% (379/919) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 53% (9/8) | 31% (4/9) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (11/20) | 29% (4/14) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 85% (13/11) | 60% (5/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 15% (13/2) | 40% (5/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (7/0) | 11% (9/1) |
Sada Nahimana Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats 
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Sada Nahimana
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Sofia Rocchetti
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve %
85%
(
71 of
84)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
1
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
71
|
6-0 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Emma Lene
86%
(
74 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
10
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
89
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Diana Martynov
84%
(
53 of
63)
1st Serve %
78%
(
50 of
64)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
7
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
48%
(
30 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Elena Milovanovic
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
Player
Sada Nahimana
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Julia Peer
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
59%
(
20 of
34)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Shana Martin Mao
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Sada Nahimana
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
78%
(
54 of
69)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Shana Martin Mao
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
8 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Thasaporn Naklo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Fangzhou Liu
Player
Thasaporn Naklo
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
85%
(
17 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yexin Ma
Player
Thasaporn Naklo
46%
(
36 of
79)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
95)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chihiro Muramatsu
Player
Thasaporn Naklo
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
1
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
20%
(
1 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dalila Jakupovic
Player
Thasaporn Naklo
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
8 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
50
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thasaporn Naklo
Player
Sohyun Park
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thasaporn Naklo
Player
Vaishnavi Adkar
59%
(
74 of
125)
1st Serve %
73%
(
86 of
118)
9
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
54 of
86)
53%
(
27 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
42%
(
52 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
52 of
118)
125
Total Points Won
118
|
3-6 7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Yashina
Player
Thasaporn Naklo
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xinxin Yao
Player
Thasaporn Naklo
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yulia Putintseva
Player
Thasaporn Naklo
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve %
51%
(
53 of
103)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
10
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
103)
107
Total Points Won
93
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vaidehi Chaudhari
Player
Thasaporn Naklo
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
45%
(
21 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Nahimana Vs Naklo Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Thasaporn Naklo
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
