Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sada Nahimana vs Tamara Curovic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nahimana vs Curovic analysis and find out who is favored!
Sada Nahimana vs Tamara Curovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nahimana has won 44.66% of points on his second serve, while Curovic has won 40.98%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nahimana, in recent form, has won 56.44% of his opponent's second serve points, while Curovic has won 57.07%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.34% and 45.75% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nahimana has saved 54.4% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Curovic has saved 51.65% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nahimana has won 48.39% of matches played (W/L 30/ 32), with Curovic winning 45.24% (W/L 19/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nahimana has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 40/ 25), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 8/ 10). Curovic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 232/ 190), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Nahimana has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 49.12% of matches (W/L 28/ 29), where as Curovic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70.83% of matches (W/L 17/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Nahimana winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Nahimana winning 4 and Curovic winning 0. The last match between Nahimana and Curovic was at the W25 Vrnjacka Banja, 18-08-2022, Second, Clay with Sada Nahimana getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:36:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nahimana and Curovic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nahimana winning 0 times and Curovic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nahimana winning 0, and Curovic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nahimana has played against opponents with an average rank of 277.68 while Curovic has played against players with an average rank of 182.64.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nahimana has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Curovic has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nahimana has converted 51.95% of breakpoint opportunities, and Curovic has converted 48.1% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nahimana 2 - 0 Curovic
383
Rank
244
High
22
Age
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
781
Rank
394
High
29
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
59% (154-106)
Career Total W/L
55% (374-311)
47% (7-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Sada Nahimana | Tamara Curovic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 24 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:30 | 1:36:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (73/119) | 53% (58/110) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (51/73) | 59% (34/58) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (22/46) | 33% (17/52) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (10/15) | 40% (4/10) |
| Return Points W% | 54% (59/110) | 39% (46/119) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Sada Nahimana
Player
Tamara Curovic
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Tamara Curovic
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
37%
(
19 of
52)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sada Nahimana | Tamara Curovic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (7/8) | 0% (0/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 47% (16/18) | 0% (0/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (144/144) | 33% (12/24) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.19 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 27 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.5 |
| DFs Total | 51 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:28 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 198.27 | 351 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (675/1005) | 60% (68/114) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (395/675) | 54% (37/68) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (139/330) | 46% (21/46) |
| BPs Won% Total | 54% (60/111) | 19% (3/16) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (418/925) | 42% (64/152) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 42% (5/7) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (7/15) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (9/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (9/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Sada Nahimana Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
Player
Sada Nahimana
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Julia Peer
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
59%
(
20 of
34)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Shana Martin Mao
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Sada Nahimana
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
78%
(
54 of
69)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Shana Martin Mao
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
8 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mara Guth
Player
Sada Nahimana
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
61 of
82)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
46 of
82)
76
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Aya El Aouni
86%
(
50 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Gina Feistel
81%
(
70 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
49%
(
42 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Sada Nahimana
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
82
Total Points Won
58
|
2-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Ariana Geerlings
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
81)
2
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
10
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
47%
(
42 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
43 of
81)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tamara Curovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Melis Sezer
Player
Tamara Curovic
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalia Siedliska
Player
Tamara Curovic
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pooja Ingale
Player
Tamara Curovic
65%
(
11 of
17)
1st Serve %
48%
(
13 of
27)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
8 of
11)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
26
Total Points Won
18
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentini Grammatikopoulou
Player
Tamara Curovic
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
26 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Johanna Silva
Player
Tamara Curovic
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
9
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
52%
(
41 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 4-6 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tamara Curovic
Player
Franziska Kremerskothen
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve %
68%
(
27 of
40)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
8
57%
(
12 of
21)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emmanuelle Girard
Player
Tamara Curovic
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
64 of
118)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
16
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
16 of
54)
46%
(
11 of
24)
Break Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
51%
(
38 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
68 of
118)
105
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamara Curovic
Player
Anastasia Piangerelli
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
32%
(
12 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
53%
(
46 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
49 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
88
|
6-1 0-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Curovic
Player
Arina Solomatina
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Tamara Curovic
Player
Julia Stamatova
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve %
73%
(
59 of
81)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
43 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Nahimana Vs Curovic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
