J. B. Maneiro
To Win
S. Nahimana
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W L W W WForm
L W W L L L W L W WNahimana | Stats | Adams |
---|---|---|
81% (21-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 65% (30-16) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
267 | Ranking | 554 |
244 | Highest Rank | 554 |
24 | Age | 25 |
- | Plays | - |
5 | Titles | 0 |
61% (207-130) | Career Total W/L | 67% (87-43) |
$4,470 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
21 May 2025 / Second
21 May 2025 / First
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva atp
21 May 2025 / Second
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva atp
21 May 2025 / Second
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
When it comes to the delicate dance of the second serve, it's almost as if Adams and Nahimana attended the same school of second serves. In recent escapades, Adams has captured 37.83% of points on their second serve, a number Nahimana only slightly laughs at with 37.97%. There’s a strong connection between these figures and who might prance to victory at the end.
The return voyage of serves tells an intriguing tale, with Adams seizing 48.67% of their foes' second serve points, while Nahimana positions themselves slightly ahead at 49.39%. It's like they're competing in a game of who can make their opponent regret that second serve more. On first serve returns, Adams boasts a better 33.35% success rate while Nahimana hurriedly follows with 31.7%. A tale of elegance on the returning fields!
Tally-ho to handling pressure! Adams, ever so studious, saves 49.23% of breakpoints like a knight rescuing a damsel in distress. Meanwhile, Nahimana brings their own charm with a slightly lower but respectable 48.48% save percentage. If only all pressure situations were this straightforward!
Looking at the grander landscape, who fancies winning more matches? In a year-long saga, Adams has showcased their might with a 68.48% win rate or 63 moral victories out of 92 jousts. Nahimana, with their own sparkling 63.64% win rate, isn't too far behind, finely balancing wins and losses like a seasoned equilibrist.
Now, speaking of stage preferences, Adams shines brilliantly on indoor hard courts, grabbing 71% of bouts and striking fear into fans of Clay by only winning 53%. Nahimana, however, finds their clay shoes fit marvelously, winning 62% of the time, while indoor hard courts remain their slippery nemesis with a 44% success rate. A battle between the Clay Crusader and the Indoor Intimidator awaits!
Who mingles with tougher crowds, you ask? Adams has locked horns with opponents holding an average ranking of 326.09 while Nahimana picks rivals ranked averagely at 379.09. Talk about engaging in high-octane duels!
As for who shines in the heat of a deciding set, Nahimana seems to have a knack for the dramatic, clinching 60% of deciding sets, while Adams gives their best theatrical pose with 46%. It’s a cliffhanger in every set!
Breaking new ground, Adams turns 38.69% of breakpoint opportunities into triumphs while Nahimana elegantly converts 48.72%. Whoever holds the key to breaking serve holds the path to applause!
When all stats have put on their finest attire and paraded across the stage, it appears Nahimana is poised to edge out the victory. Though both competitors bring splendid stats to the table, Nahimana's aptitude in high-pressure moments and knack at conversions tip the scale slightly in their favor. Prepare for a dazzling exhibition of tennis wit and wizardry!
Nahimana vs Adams Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
No Recent Matches Available
No Recent Matches Available
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
61% (207/130) | Win/Loss | 67% (87/43) |
59% (444/308) | Sets Win/Loss | 65% (192/103) |
54% (3644/3129) | Games Win/Loss | 56% (1545/1210) |
61% (42/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 69% (68/30) |
63% (154/89) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (14/11) |
44% (11/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 71% (5/2) |
0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
606 | Aces Total | 235 |
0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
891 | Total Double Faults | 306 |
1:39:48 | Average Match Time | 1:19:5 |
477.47 | Average Opponent Rank | 340.91 |
67% (14435/21445) | 1st Serve % | 65% (4376/6721) |
60% (8700/14435) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (2728/4376) |
46% (3248/7011) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1074/2345) |
49% (1407/2847) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (426/859) |
47% (10187/21591) | Return Points Win % | 48% (3110/6525) |
43% (3/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
60% (165/109) | Challenger W/L | 57% (21/16) |
70% (39/17) | Futures W/L | 71% (66/27) |
61% (204/334) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (87/130) |
54% (35/65) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (10/20) |
59% (48/82) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (17/35) |
91% (200/181) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (83/77) |
10% (200/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (83/6) |
18% (137/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (47/10) |