Sada Nahimana vs Jasmijn Gimbrere Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W L W W W L
Form
W W L W L L W L W LHead-To-Head: Nahimana 1 - 1 Gimbrere
They have played 4 sets in total, with Nahimana winning 2 and Gimbrere winning 2. The last match between Nahimana and Gimbrere was at the W50 Bujumbura, 05-04-2025, Round: Semifinals, Surface: Clay, with Sada Nahimana getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sada Nahimana | 1 |
| Jasmijn Gimbrere | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W50 Bujumbura(05-04-2025)
Sada Nahimana
Jasmijn Gimbrere
7
5
6
2
| Nahimana | Stats | Gimbrere |
|---|---|---|
| 78% (21-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 54% (15-13) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 267 | Ranking | 496 |
| 244 | Highest Rank | 442 |
| 24 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 5 | Titles | 1 |
| 61% (207-131) | Career Total W/L | 54% (155-130) |
| $4,470 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Nishikori VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Yastremska VS Aiava PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Sada Nahimana
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Sada Nahimana
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
54%
(
14 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
53
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 18 | Games Won | 19 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:25:31 | Average Match Time | 1:25:31 |
| 66% (69/104) | 1st Serve % | 63% (65/103) |
| 59% (41/69) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (37/65) |
| 49% (17/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 58% (22/38) |
| 44% (7/16) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 57% (8/14) |
| 43% (44/103) | Return Points Win % | 44% (46/104) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nahimana vs Gimbrere Match Preview :
When diving into the recent form of both competitors, one might wonder how their second serve game will influence the outcome. Over the past six months, Gimbrere has showcased a slight edge, winning 39.84% of her points on second serves. Nahimana, slightly lagging, clinched 36.29% in the same category. This seemingly modest difference often has a high correlation with predicting the match winner. Will this tiny margin prove decisive as they square off?
Turning our attention to return game statistics in recent form, the battle gets even tighter. Gimbrere has managed to win 50.05% of her opponent's second serve points. Nahimana isn't far behind at 49.66%. As for first serve returns, their stats hover quite similarly, with Gimbrere at 30.82% and Nahimana at 30.92%. These figures suggest an intensely competitive encounter. Who can capitalize on these marginal advantages to emerge victorious in their head-to-head showdown?
Handling pressure effectively is key in tennis. Gimbrere has excelled at saving breakpoints, fending off 52.35% of them recently, compared to Nahimana’s 48.38%. In terms of converting breakpoints, Nahimana has shone with a 45.19% success rate, eclipsing Gimbrere’s 38.26%. Such stats are pivotal for in-game betting, highlighting situations where each player's resolve will be tested to the limit. Which player will leverage these critical moments to surge ahead?
Performance over the last year adds another layer to this analysis. Gimbrere has triumphed in 59.7% of her matches, whereas Nahimana has clinched victory in 67.14% of her outings. Nahimana's slightly superior win-loss record may suggest she could be the favorite, yet it’s Gimbrere who has prevailed in their solitary head-to-head clash. Their previous encounter, a brisk affair at W 25 Bujumbura, witnessed Gimbrere’s commanding 6-1, 6-4 win. Given these insights, will history repeat itself, or can Nahimana turn the tables?
Surface preferences add another dimension. Gimbrere’s forte lies on hard courts with a 56% win rate, while Nahimana excels on clay with a 63% success rate. As matches predominantly vary by location and surface, this could give Nahimana an upper hand if played on clay. Nevertheless, their single head-to-head meeting on clay was won by Gimbrere. Can their historical performance over different surfaces foretell the winner?
Finally, considering the opponent quality, Gimbrere has faced players with an average ranking of 467.07, whereas Nahimana's opponents averaged at 393.57. This shows Nahimana has consistently played against tougher competition, potentially honing her skills more effectively. With all these stats in mind, while Gimbrere has the upper hand in head-to-head records, Nahimana’s robustness against higher-ranked opponents might just give her an edge. If the contest swings towards a deciding set, Nahimana’s 60% win rate in such situations indicates she might handle the pressure better.
As we connect the dots, Gimbrere's past triumph against Nahimana and her superior second serve performance present a compelling case. However, Nahimana's incremental advantages in overall performance and playing against stronger opponents suggest she might clinch the victory. This captivating battle of sts shall ultimately unfold on the court, revealing who can draw on their strengths more effectively to secure the win.
Nahimana vs Gimbrere Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Sada Nahimana Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Sada Nahimana
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Aya El Aouni
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
76%
(
42 of
55)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Carolina Meligeni Alves
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
89)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Luca Udvardy
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Sada Nahimana
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Amina Anshba
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
79)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Sara Borkop
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
47%
(
26 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Sada Nahimana
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
53%
(
19 of
36)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jasmijn Gimbrere Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Ayla Aksu
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Karolina Vlckova
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
77)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
9
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Astrid Wanja Brune Olsen
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
63%
(
74 of
117)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
103)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
10
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
33%
(
14 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
59 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
106
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Georgia Pedone
55%
(
44 of
80)
1st Serve %
90%
(
94 of
105)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
48 of
94)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
49%
(
39 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
105)
93
Total Points Won
92
|
1-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Bertacchi
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
52%
(
51 of
99)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
1
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
3
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
54%
(
26 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
43 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasia Bertacchi
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
56%
(
59 of
105)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
4
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
47 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
91
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jasmijn Gimbrere
Player
Yuliya Hatouka
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Jasmijn Gimbrere
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (207/131) | Win/Loss | 54% (155/130) |
| 59% (445/310) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (347/306) |
| 54% (3655/3145) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (3153/2913) |
| 61% (42/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (50/40) |
| 63% (154/90) | Clay Win/Loss | 54% (74/63) |
| 44% (11/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (31/25) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 607 | Aces Total | 361 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 |
| 894 | Total Double Faults | 936 |
| 1:39:53 | Average Match Time | 1:24:34 |
| 476.27 | Average Opponent Rank | 484.64 |
| 67% (14488/21529) | 1st Serve % | 61% (9470/15482) |
| 60% (8734/14488) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (5698/9470) |
| 46% (3258/7042) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (2594/6012) |
| 49% (1411/2856) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1009/2159) |
| 47% (10224/21682) | Return Points Win % | 47% (7383/15624) |
| 38% (3/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 60% (165/109) | Challenger W/L | 52% (88/82) |
| 70% (39/17) | Futures W/L | 59% (67/46) |
| 61% (204/335) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (152/281) |
| 54% (35/65) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (19/45) |
| 58% (48/83) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (46/87) |
| 91% (200/181) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (144/126) |
| 10% (200/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (144/18) |
| 18% (138/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (141/28) |
Nahimana vs. Gimbrere Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
