Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sada Nahimana vs Clara Burel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nahimana vs Burel analysis and find out who is favored!
Sada Nahimana vs Clara Burel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nahimana has won 44.63% of points on his second serve, while Burel has won 43.01%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nahimana, in recent form, has won 57.63% of his opponent's second serve points, while Burel has won 59.74%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.46% and 40.73% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nahimana has saved 52.65% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Burel has saved 47.53% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nahimana has won 50.77% of matches played (W/L 33/ 32), with Burel winning 65.08% (W/L 41/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nahimana has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 40/ 25), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 8/ 10). Burel has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 44/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 72/ 57).
- Player level: In the last year, Nahimana has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.67% of matches (W/L 31/ 29), where as Burel has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 67.86% of matches (W/L 19/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nahimana has played against opponents with an average rank of 277.38 while Burel has played against players with an average rank of 179.32.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nahimana has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Burel has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nahimana has converted 52.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Burel has converted 50.76% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nahimana 0 - 0 Burel
383
Rank
244
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
44
Rank
44
High
23
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
Form
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
60% (157-106)
Career Total W/L
59% (160-109)
56% (10-8)
YTD W/L
53% (10-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$1,264,038
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sada Nahimana | Clara Burel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (10/8) | 53% (10/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (22/18) | 52% (24/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (182/167) | 51% (212/202) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 54% (7/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) | 33% (1/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 25% (1/3) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.16 | 0.29 |
| Aces Total | 27 | 58 |
| DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.48 |
| DFs Total | 62 | 96 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:56 | 1:41:18 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 210.44 | 143.79 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (844/1208) | 56% (759/1348) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (495/844) | 62% (467/759) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (155/364) | 42% (248/589) |
| BPs Won% Total | 57% (78/138) | 48% (88/182) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (527/1130) | 47% (671/1429) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 53% (8/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (10/18) | 53% (10/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (12/10) | 78% (9/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (12/2) | 22% (9/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 30% (10/3) |
Sada Nahimana Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Sada Nahimana
Player
Emma Lene
86%
(
74 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
10
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
89
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Diana Martynov
84%
(
53 of
63)
1st Serve %
78%
(
50 of
64)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
7
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
48%
(
30 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Elena Milovanovic
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
Player
Sada Nahimana
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Julia Peer
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
59%
(
20 of
34)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Shana Martin Mao
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Sada Nahimana
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
78%
(
54 of
69)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Shana Martin Mao
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
8 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mara Guth
Player
Sada Nahimana
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
61 of
82)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
46 of
82)
76
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Aya El Aouni
86%
(
50 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Clara Burel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Clara Burel
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
35 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-0 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Katarina Zavatska
65%
(
66 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
45%
(
45 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
42 of
78)
98
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Katie Boulter
Player
Clara Burel
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
0
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caroline Wozniacki
Player
Clara Burel
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Clara Burel
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
51%
(
44 of
87)
2
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
6
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
33%
(
12 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
47 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Xiyu Wang
55%
(
50 of
91)
1st Serve %
62%
(
73 of
118)
5
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
9
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
56 of
118)
110
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sloane Stephens
Player
Clara Burel
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Eva Lys
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
44%
(
21 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
57%
(
61 of
107)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
5
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
7
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
50 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
103)
104
Total Points Won
106
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Donna Vekic
Player
Clara Burel
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-0 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Nahimana Vs Burel Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Sada Nahimana
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
