Sachia Vickery vs Kirsten Flipkens Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vickery vs Flipkens analysis and find out who is favored!
Sachia Vickery vs Kirsten Flipkens Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vickery has won 46.16% of points on his second serve, while Flipkens has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vickery, in recent form, has won 60.83% of his opponent's second serve points, while Flipkens has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.62% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vickery has saved 50.46% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Flipkens has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vickery has won 58.73% of matches played (W/L 37/ 26), with Flipkens winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vickery has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 27/ 18), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 23/ 25). Flipkens has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 68/ 40), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 180/ 146).
- Player level: In the last year, Vickery has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.33% of matches (W/L 14/ 10), where as Flipkens has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Vickery winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Vickery winning 0 and Flipkens winning 2. The last match between Vickery and Flipkens was at the ASB Classic - Auckland, 01-01-2019, First, Hard with Kirsten Flipkens getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:3:11.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Vickery and Flipkens have played a deciding set 0 times, with Vickery winning 0 times and Flipkens 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Vickery winning 0, and Flipkens 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vickery has played against opponents with an average rank of 247.44 while Flipkens has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vickery has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Flipkens has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vickery has converted 48.9% of breakpoint opportunities, and Flipkens has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Vickery 0 - 1 Flipkens
3
Total
0
Mast
3
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
134
Rank
73
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
531
Rank
13
High
38
Age
R
Plays
12
Total
0
Mast
10
Chall
0
Slam
1
Main
1
Minor
Form
57% (381-291)
Career Total W/L
56% (495-383)
63% (15-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,062,205
Career Prize Money
$3,051,580
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Sachia Vickery | Kirsten Flipkens |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 4 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 5 |
DFs (Total) | 4 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:3:11 | 1:3:11 |
1st Serve % | 53% (26/49) | 83% (43/52) |
1st Serve Win% | 65% (17/26) | 74% (32/43) |
2nd Serve Win% | 35% (8/23) | 44% (4/9) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 44% (4/9) |
Return Points W% | 31% (16/52) | 49% (24/49) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-2 |
Kirsten Flipkens
Player
Sachia Vickery
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Sachia Vickery | Kirsten Flipkens |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 63% (15/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 61% (33/21) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 55% (288/237) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 64% (9/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.18 | 0 |
Aces Total | 46 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.29 | 0 |
DFs Total | 74 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:41:33 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 206.33 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 53% (921/1732) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 63% (582/921) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 46% (372/811) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 49% (122/251) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 49% (859/1761) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 71% (10/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (15/24) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 93% (14/13) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 7% (14/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Sachia Vickery Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Cori Gauff
Player
Sachia Vickery
55%
(
60 of
110)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
92)
2
Aces
1
15
Double Faults
4
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
40%
(
20 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
48%
(
53 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
51 of
92)
108
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sachia Vickery
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sachia Vickery
Player
Greetje Minnen
52%
(
37 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
32 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sachia Vickery
Player
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jaqueline Cristian
Player
Sachia Vickery
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sachia Vickery
Player
Mccartney Kessler
54%
(
49 of
91)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
48%
(
44 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sachia Vickery
Player
Lauren Davis
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mona Barthel
Player
Sachia Vickery
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
67)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Anna Schmiedlova
Player
Sachia Vickery
68%
(
73 of
108)
1st Serve %
53%
(
59 of
111)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
45%
(
49 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
51 of
111)
110
Total Points Won
109
|
5-7 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sachia Vickery
Player
Rebecca Marino
44%
(
21 of
48)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
1
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Kirsten Flipkens Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Simona Halep
Player
Kirsten Flipkens
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kirsten Flipkens
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
73%
(
55 of
75)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Viktoriya Tomova
Player
Kirsten Flipkens
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kirsten Flipkens
Player
Elise Mertens
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
34 of
68)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
10
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kirsten Flipkens
Player
Maryna Zanevska
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Kirsten Flipkens
Player
Viktoriya Tomova
78%
(
74 of
95)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
46 of
67)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
28 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kirsten Flipkens
Player
Kristina Mladenovic
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Shelby Rogers
Player
Kirsten Flipkens
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
36 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kirsten Flipkens
Player
Ann Li
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
72%
(
28 of
39)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kirsten Flipkens
Player
Anastasia Tikhonova
63%
(
56 of
89)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
89)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
12
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H |
view more